Cited by 196Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeHealth disparities and outcomesHealth and Medical Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Self-Reported Population Health: An International Perspective Based on EQ-5D

Open access
Szende, A., Janssen, M.B., Cabasés, J.M., Ramos Goñi, J.M.·2013·Value in Health

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jval.2013.08.812

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Szende, A., Janssen, M. B., Cabasés, J. M., & Ramos Goñi, J. M.
Affiliations
  • EuroQol Research Foundation (NL)
  • Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA) (ES)
Venue
Value in Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-11
Volume
16
Issue
7
Pages
A464
ISSN
1098-3015 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4253882148
Cited by
196
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 1
FWCI
17.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Value in Health (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Studies
Keywords
self-reported health, EQ-5D, EQ-5D-3L, population norms, health disparities, EQ-VAS, sociodemographic factors, age and gender differences, education and health, usual activities, pain and discomfort, cross-national comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review