Cited by 42Menstrual Health and DisordersGender Studies and Social IssuesHypothalamic control of reproductive hormones

Dismantling menstrual taboos to overcome gender inequality

Wilson, Emily, Haver, Jacquelyn, Torondel, Belen, Rubli, Jennifer, Caruso, Bethany A·2018·The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2352-4642(18)30209-8

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilson, E., Haver, J., Torondel, B., Rubli, J., & Caruso, B. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • Save the Children (US)
  • Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Wilson, Emily
Venue
The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-08
Volume
2
Issue
8
Pages
e17
ISSN
2352-4642 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2884268589
Cited by
42
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies and Social Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
Keywords
menstrual taboos, menstrual hygiene, adolescent girls, gender inequality, social norms, menstrual health, sexual and reproductive health and rights, low-income countries
MeSH terms
Developing Countries, Female, Humans, Menstruation, Power, Psychological, Socioeconomic Factors, Taboo

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review