Clinical trial designs for artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal endoscopy
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A longer-term prospective trial is assessing the link between colonoscopy CADe systems and colorectal cancer incidence and mortality after 10-year follow-up.
“a longer-term, prospective clinical trial is now seeking to assess the connection between colonoscopy CADe systems and incidence and mortality from colorectal cancer after a 10-year follow-up period (25).”
From Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions (2024) · cites this paper as [25]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 10 · Cited by 18
- Authors
- Mori, Y., Kaminski, M. F., Hassan, C., & Bretthauer, M.
- Affiliations
- Oslo University Hospital (NO)
- University of Oslo (NO)
- Humanitas University (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Mori, Yuichi
- Venue
- The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-09
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 785-786
- ISSN
- 2468-1156 (ISSN-L)
- 2468-1253
- OpenAlex
- W4289687650
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7
- FWCI
- 1.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- The Lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (101057099)
- European Commission
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (22H03357)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence, clinical trial design, gastrointestinal endoscopy, colonoscopy, AI-assisted colonoscopy, regulatory approval, randomised trials
- MeSH terms
- Artificial Intelligence, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review