Cited by 847Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityCommunication and COVID-19 ImpactPublic Health Policies and Education

COVID-19: health literacy is an underestimated problem

Open access
Paakkari, Leena, Okan, Orkan·2020·The Lancet Public Health

Abstract

Rapid development of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) into a pandemic has called for people to acquire and apply health information, and adapt their behaviour at a fast pace.1 Health communication intended to educate people about the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and how to avoid getting or spreading the infection has become widely available. Most valuable information is created in an easy-to-understand manner that offers simple and practical solutions, such as washing hands, maintaining physical distance2, and where to find information about the latest recommendations, and advice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2468-2667(20)30086-4

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Health literacy is an important concept during the COVID-19 pandemic, when health information is available mostly in digital and online forms.

    “Health literacy is an important concept during the COVID-19 pandemic, when health information is available mostly in digital and online forms [12], while people need the skills to navigate these information environments and process and filter information to make health decisions.”

    From Digital health literacy, online information-seeking behaviour, and satisfaction of Covid-19 information among the university students of East and South-East Asia (2022) · cites this paper as [12]

    In the main text (page not specified), the paper calls health literacy important for preventing communicable diseases during COVID-19 and discusses the need to acquire and use health information. It does not say that health information is available mostly in digital or online forms. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [2]Prem K Liu Y Russell TW The effect of control strategies to reduce social mixing on outcomes of the COVID-19 epidemic in Wuhan, China: a modelling study Lancet Public Health 2020 published online March 25. 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30073-6 PMC7158905 32220655 · DOI
  2. [3]Sørensen K Pelikan JM Röthlin F Health literacy in Europe: comparative results of the European Health Literacy Survey (HLS-EU) Eur J Public Health 25 2015 1053 1058 25843827 PMC4668324
  3. [5]Wikler D Personal and social responsibility for health Ethics Int Aff 16 2002 47 55 15709278
  4. [6]May T Public communication, risk perception, and the viability of preventive vaccination against communicable diseases Bioethics 19 2005 407 421 16222856

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paakkari, L., & Okan, O.
Affiliations
  • University of Jyväskylä (FI)
  • Bielefeld University (DE)
Corresponding author
Paakkari, Leena
Venue
The Lancet Public Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
5
Issue
5
Pages
e249-e250
ISSN
2468-2667 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3017178742
Cited by
847
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 70 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 101 · 2023: 147 · 2022: 177 · 2021: 196 · 2020: 95
FWCI
153.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Jyväskylä University Digital Archive (University of Jyväskylä) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, health literacy, health communication, SARS-CoV-2, pandemic, health information, health behavior, public health communication
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Humans, Pneumonia, Viral, Global Health, Health Behavior, Coronavirus Infections, Consumer Health Information, Health Literacy, Health Communication, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review