Cited by 483Vaccine Coverage and HesitancyCOVID-19 and Mental HealthRisk Perception and Management

Mistrust in biomedical research and vaccine hesitancy: The forefront challenge in the battle against COVID-19 in Italy

Open access
Palamenghi, Lorenzo, Barello, Serena, Boccia, Stefania, Graffigna, Guendalina·2020·European Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

Researchers have been working quickly and collaboratively for the development of vaccines against the COVID-19 virus. The effort of the scientific community in searching a vaccine for COVID-19 may be hampered by a diffused vaccine hesitancy. Two waves of data collection on representative samples of the Italian population (during the "first" and "second" phase of the Italian Covid-19 mitigation strategy) were conducted to understand citizens' perceptions and behaviors about preventive behaviors willingness to vaccine for COVID-19. Our study shows that willingness to COVID-19 vaccine is correlated to trust in research and in vaccines, which decreased between phase 1 and phase 2 of the Italian pandemic. According to the results of our study, the proportion of citizens that seem to be intentioned to get the Covid-19 vaccine is probably too small to effectively stop the spreading of the disease. This requires to foster a climate of respectful mutual trust between science and society, where scientific knowledge is not only preached but also cultivated and sustained thanks to the emphatic understanding of citizens worries, needs of reassurance and health expectations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10654-020-00675-8

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [19]Provenzi L Barello S The science of the future: establishing a citizen-scientist collaborative agenda after Covid-19 Front Public Health 2020 8 6 8 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00282 32582619 PMC7291379 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Palamenghi, L., Barello, S., Boccia, S., & Graffigna, G.
Affiliations
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
Corresponding author
Graffigna, Guendalina
Venue
European Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2020-08
Volume
35
Issue
8
Pages
785-788
ISSN
  • 0393-2990 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7284
OpenAlex
W3049479051
Cited by
483
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 171 · 2021: 147 · 2020: 7
FWCI
55.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Fondazione Cariplo
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
Keywords
COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, trust in research, vaccine trust, vaccine willingness, public perception of science, Italian population, preventive behavior
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Vaccines, Communication, Humans, Italy, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Pneumonia, Viral, Vaccination, Viral Vaccines, Coronavirus Infections, Trust, Biomedical Research, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review