Cited by 26Balance, Gait, and Falls PreventionInjury Epidemiology and PreventionOccupational Health and Safety Research

Home modifications to prevent home fall injuries in houses with Māori occupants (MHIPI): a randomised controlled trial

Open access
Keall, Michael D, Tupara, Hope, Pierse, Nevil, Wilkie, Marg, Baker, Michael G, Howden-Chapman, Philippa, Cunningham, Chris·2021·The Lancet Public Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As with many Indigenous populations internationally, Māori in New Zealand suffer health inequity. We aimed to assess the rate of fall injuries at home with and without home modifications in houses with Māori occupants. METHODS: We did a single-blind randomised controlled trial in the Wellington and Taranaki regions of New Zealand and enrolled owner-occupied households with at least one Māori occupant. Only households who stated they intended to live at that address for the subsequent 3 years were eligible for participation. We randomly assigned (1:1) households to either the intervention group, who received home modifications (handrails for outside steps and internal stairs, grab rails for bathrooms, outside lighting, repairs to window catches, high-visibility and slip-resistant edging for outside steps, fixing of lifted edges of carpets and mats, non-slip bath mats, and slip-resistant surfacing for outside areas such as decks) immediately, or the control group, who received the modifications 3 years later. Data on home injuries were obtained from the Accident Compensation Corporation and coded by study team members, who were masked to study group allocation. The primary outcome was the rate of medically treated fall injuries at home per household per year, analysed according to intention to treat. This Māori Home Injury Prevention Intervention (MHIPI) trial is now completed, and is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12613000148774. FINDINGS: Between Sept 3, 2013, and Oct 1, 2014, 824 households were assessed for eligibility and 254 were enrolled, of which 126 (50%) were assigned to the intervention group and 128 (50%) were assigned to the control group. After adjustment for previous falls and geographical region, there was an estimated 31% reduction in the rate of fall injuries at home per year exposed to the intervention compared with households in the control group (adjusted relative rate 0·69 [95% CI 0·47-1·00]). INTERPRETATION: Low-cost home modifications and repairs can be an effective means to reduce injury disparities. The high prevalence of modifiable safety issues in Māori homes merits considerable policy and community effort. FUNDING: Health Research Council of New Zealand.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2468-2667(21)00135-3

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A further trial of homes with Indigenous Māori occupants from 2013 to 2017 found that the rate of fall injuries was reduced by 31% in modified homes compared with control households.

    “The rate of fall injuries was reduced by 31% in the modified homes compared with households in the control group.”
  • Because Māori households are on average larger than non-Māori households, the intervention cost of each fall injury prevented in the Māori trial was only around two-thirds of that for the previous HIPI intervention, indicating even greater cost-effectiveness and potential to reduce injury for Māori.

    “Because M¯ aori households are, on average, larger than non-M¯ aori households, the intervention cost of each fall injury prevented was only around two-thirds of that for the previous HIPI intervention, indicating even greater cost-effectiveness and an even greater potential to reduce injury for M¯ aori.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keall, M. D., Tupara, H., Pierse, N., Wilkie, M., Baker, M. G., Howden-Chapman, P., & Cunningham, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Otago (NZ)
  • Massey University (NZ)
Corresponding author
Keall, Michael D
Venue
The Lancet Public Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-09
Volume
6
Issue
9
Pages
e631-e640
ISSN
2468-2667 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3190372458
Cited by
26
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
6.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Massey Research Online (Massey University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Health Research Council of New Zealand
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Radiological and Ultrasound Technology › Occupational Health and Safety Research
Keywords
home modification, Māori, Indigenous health inequities, injury prevention, handrails, bathroom safety
MeSH terms
Accidental Falls, Accidents, Home, Aged, Housing, Humans, New Zealand, Health Status Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review