Cited by 55Phonocardiography and Auscultation TechniquesCOVID-19 diagnosis using AIVoice and Speech Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

COVID-19 detection from audio: seven grains of salt

Open access
Coppock, Harry, Jones, Lyn, Kiskin, Ivan, Schuller, Björn·2021·The Lancet Digital Health

Abstract

Digital mass testing for COVID-19 via a mobile phone application could be made possible through machine learning and its ability to identify patterns in data. COVID-19 appears to confer unique features in the audio produced by infected individuals,1 and machine learning COVID-19 detection from breath, cough, and speech audio recordings has yielded promising results.2–4 In this critique, we present seven major issues with this research and argue that further investigation is needed before conclusions about the detectability of COVID-19 from audio can be made.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2589-7500(21)00141-2

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 14 references

4 of the 14 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 55

Metadata

Authors
Coppock, H., Jones, L., Kiskin, I., & Schuller, B.
Affiliations
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • North Bristol NHS Trust (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Coppock, Harry
Venue
The Lancet Digital Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-09
Volume
3
Issue
9
Pages
e537-e538
ISSN
2589-7500 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3185939438
Cited by
55
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 8
FWCI
7.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Digital Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OPUS (Augsburg University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Phonocardiography and Auscultation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Voice and Speech Disorders
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, audio-based diagnosis, speech analysis, cough, lung sounds, mobile application, large-scale testing, machine learning, diagnostic accuracy
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Testing, Cough, Humans, Mass Screening, Respiration, Sound, Speech, Telemedicine, Cell Phone, Mobile Applications, Datasets as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review