PreprintCited by 91Phonocardiography and Auscultation TechniquesCOVID-19 diagnosis using AISARS-CoV-2 detection and testing

Cough Against COVID: Evidence of COVID-19 Signature in Cough Sounds

Open access
Bagad, Piyush, Dalmia, Aman, Doshi, Jigar, Nagrani, Arsha, Bhamare, Parag, Mahale, Amrita, Rane, Saurabh, Agarwal, Neeraj +1 more·2020·arXiv

Abstract

Testing capacity for COVID-19 remains a challenge globally due to the lack of adequate supplies, trained personnel, and sample-processing equipment. These problems are even more acute in rural and underdeveloped regions. We demonstrate that solicited-cough sounds collected over a phone, when analysed by our AI model, have statistically significant signal indicative of COVID-19 status (AUC 0.72, t-test,p <0.01,95% CI 0.61-0.83). This holds true for asymptomatic patients as well. Towards this, we collect the largest known(to date) dataset of microbiologically confirmed COVID-19 cough sounds from 3,621 individuals. When used in a triaging step within an overall testing protocol, by enabling risk-stratification of individuals before confirmatory tests, our tool can increase the testing capacity of a healthcare system by 43% at disease prevalence of 5%, without additional supplies, trained personnel, or physical infrastructure

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2009.08790

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Noisy label issue has been found in AudioSet.

    “Due to the difficulty of annotating YouTube videos with a large sound vocabulary, the noisy label issue has been found in AudioSet [6, 9, 10]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bagad, P., Dalmia, A., Doshi, J., Nagrani, A., Bhamare, P., Mahale, A., Rane, S., Agarwal, N., & Panicker, R.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3087180772
Cited by
91
References
30
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 41
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Phonocardiography and Auscultation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, cough sounds, voice analysis, acoustic biomarkers, AI-assisted diagnosis, remote triage, asymptomatic patients, testing capacity, resource-limited settings, risk stratification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review