Cited by 147Bone health and osteoporosis researchMenopause: Health Impacts and TreatmentsBone Metabolism and Diseases

Bone loss in relation to menopause: a prospective study during 16 years

Ahlborg, H.G, Johnell, O, Nilsson, B.E, Jeppsson, S, Rannevik, G, Karlsson, M.K·2001·Bone

Abstract

This prospective study evaluated bone loss in the peri- and postmenopausal period in 156 women followed from age 48 to 64 years. All women were premenopausal at the start of the study. Areal bone mineral density (g/cm(2)) was measured by single-photon absorptiometry (SPA) of the forearm at the 1 cm level (BMD 1 cm) and the 6 cm level (BMD 6 cm) every second year. Onset of menopause (MP) was determined according to the criteria of the World Health Organization (12 months of amenorrhea and elevated follicle-stimulating hormone). At the end of the study, 125 of 156 women (80%) remained. Bone mineral density (BMD) at age 48 years correlated with BMD at age 64 years within the respective region (r = 0.4-0.5, p < 0.001, respectively). There was no BMD loss in the premenopausal period. BMD loss was accelerated at menopause (MP) independent of chronological age. BMD loss was greater during the first 5 years following MP than during the following 6 years (BMD 1 cm 2.4% per year [1.0%-3.9%] vs. 0.4% per year [-0.3%-1.0%], p < 0.01). The quartile of women with late MP (>53.7 years) had greater bone loss during the first 5 years after MP than the quartile of women with early MP (<50.3 years) (p < 0.001). At age 64 years, BMD was no different when comparing the quartile of women with late MP vs. the quartile of women with early MP. Furthermore, there was no correlation between age at menopause and BMD at the age of 64. In summary, among women still menstruating at age 48 years, there was no measurable BMD loss in the premenopausal period. Independent of chronological age, BMD loss accelerated during MP. Rates of loss were highest in the early postmenopausal period. Independent of age at MP, premenopausal women with low age-specific BMD at age 48 years had an increased risk of sustaining low BMD at age 64 years also.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s8756-3282(00)00451-8

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ahlborg, H. G., Johnell, O., Nilsson, B. E., Jeppsson, S., Rannevik, G., & Karlsson, M. K.
Corresponding author
Ahlborg, H.G
Venue
Bone
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-03
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
327-331
ISSN
  • 1873-2763 (ISSN-L)
  • 8756-3282
OpenAlex
W2010252892
Cited by
147
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 12
FWCI
8.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Bone (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bone Metabolism and Diseases
Keywords
bone loss, menopause, postmenopausal osteoporosis, bone mineral density, age at menopause, premenopausal women, forearm bone mineral density
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Menopause, Middle Aged, Osteoporosis, Prospective Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review