CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 248Discourse Analysis in Language StudiesLinguistics and Discourse AnalysisAcademic Writing and Publishing

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Disciplinary Identities: Individuality and Community in Academic Discourse

Hyland, Ken·2012·Cambridge University Press eBooks
DOI 10.1017/9781009406512
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Disciplinary Identities uses findings from corpus research to present fascinating insights into the relationship between author identity and disciplinarity in academic writing. Ken Hyland draws on a number of sources, including acknowledgements texts, academic homepages and biographies, to explore how authors convey aspects of their identities within the constraints placed upon them by their disciplines' rhetorical conventions. He promotes corpus methods as important tools in identity research, demonstrating the effectiveness of keyword and collocation analysis in highlighting both the norms of a particular genre and an author's idiosyncratic choices. Identity is conceived as multi-faceted and socially negotiated, and writing is seen as the contextualised performance of the author's identity to a community of readers. Hyland concludes by outlining a way forward for encouraging individuality as well as conventionality in students of EAP.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/9781009406512

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–248 of 248

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Hyland, K.
Corresponding author
Hyland, Ken
ORCID
Hyland, Ken
Venue
Cambridge University Press eBooks
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Published
2012-03-22
DOI
10.1017/9781009406512
OpenAlex
W4319587334
Cited by
248
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
22.79
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 3976 d)
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Writing and Publishing
Keywords
authorial identity, disciplinarity, academic writing, rhetorical conventions, acknowledgment, genre conventions, collocation analysis, keyword analysis, English for academic purposes, identity construction, corpus linguistics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review