God, Evil, and the Nature of Light
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Draper offers a plausible theory of intrinsic probabilities according to which they depend on the modesty and coherence of a hypothesis.
“Paul Draper (2017: 69 ff.) offers a plausible theory of intrinsic probabilities according to which they depend on the modesty and coherence of a hypothesis.”
From The nomological argument for the existence of God (2022) · cites this paper as Draper (2017: 69 ff.)
Draper admits that the minimal theses of Source Physicalism and Source Idealism have roughly equal intrinsic probability.
“Indeed, Draper (2017: 70 ff.)admits that the minimal theses of Source Physicalism (according to which everything mental is caused by something physical) and Source Idealism (according to which everything physical is caused by something mental) have roughly equal intrinsic probability.”
From The nomological argument for the existence of God (2022) · cites this paper as Draper (2017: 70 ff.)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The nomological argument for the existence of God
Hildebrand, T., & Metcalf, T. (2022) · Noûs · doi:10.1111/nous.12364 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
- Authors
- Draper, P.
- Affiliations
- Loyola University Chicago (US)
- Corresponding author
- Draper, Paul
- ORCID
- Draper, Paul
- Venue
- The Cambridge Companion to the Problem of Evil
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2017-06-09
- Pages
- 65-84
- OpenAlex
- W2725372774
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 3.97
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Theology and Philosophy of Evil
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Karl Barth and Christian Theology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Keywords
- God, evil, nature of light, theology of light, divine attributes, theodicy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
