Cited by 4Policing Practices and PerceptionsCriminal Justice and PenologyCrime Patterns and Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Critic: Changing Everything so that Everything Can Remain the Same: CompStat and American Policing

Abstract

CompStat emerged in the mid 1990s and quickly came to be seen as a major innovation in American policing. By the turn of the century it had received national awards from Harvard University and former Vice President Gore, and was featured prominently along with William Bratton (the police administrator who created the program) in the national news media. Its originators and proponents gave CompStat credit for impressive reductions in crime and improvements in neighborhood quality of life in a number of cities that had adopted the program (Silverman, 1996; Remnick, 1997; Gurwitt, 1998; Bratton, 1999). And while CompStat was first introduced only in 1994 in New York City, police departments around the country had begun to adopt it or variations of it by the first decade of the new century (Law Enforcement News, 1997; Maas, 1998; McDonald, 1998; Weisburd et al., 2003; Willis, Mastrofski & Kochel, 2010a). Indeed, in a Police Foundation survey conducted only six years after CompStat emerged on the scene in New York City, more than a third of American police agencies with 100 or more sworn officers claimed to have implemented a CompStat-like program (Weisburd et al., 2001). By 2006, Willis, Mastrofski, and Kochel (2010b) reported that about 60 percent of large police agencies had adopted CompStat, and a Police Executive Research Forum membership survey in 2011 reported that 85 percent of 166 responding member agencies reported having adopted or plans to adopt CompStat (Bureau of Jus…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/9781108278423.019

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evaluations of Compstat in the United States suggest that the emphasis on holding commanders accountable through Compstat meetings has limited innovative problem solving in the field.

    “While evaluations of Compstat in the United States suggest that the emphasis on holding commanders accountable through Compstat meetings has limited innovative problem solving in the field (Weisburd, Willis, Mastrofski, & Greenspan, 2019), a recent Israeli program suggests that innovative problem solving can be encouraged in a Compstat‐like reform (see Weisburd et al., Unpublished manuscript).”

    From Problem-oriented policing for reducing crime and disorder: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis (2020) · cites this paper as Weisburd, Willis, Mastrofski, & Greenspan, 2019

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. Bratton, 1999, Measuring What Matters: Proceedings from the Policing Research Institute Meetings, 11
  2. Willis, 2010, Maximizing the Benefits of Reform: Integrating Compstat and Community Policing
  3. Weisburd, 1988, Challenges to supervision in community policing: Observations on a pilot project, American Journal of Police, 7, 29
  4. Taylor, 2001, Breaking away from Broken Windows: Baltimore Neighborhoods and the Nationwide Fight against Crime, Grime, Fear, and Decline
  5. 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2005.00310.x · DOI
  6. Punch, 1983, Control in the Police Organization
  7. Maple, 1999, The Crime Fighter: Putting the Bad Guys out of Business
  8. Maas, 1998, What we’re learning from New York City, Parade, 10, 4
  9. Greenspan, 2003, Compstat and Organizational Change: Short Site Visit Report
  10. Greenberg, 2013, Studying New York City’s crime decline: and<ethodological issues, Justice Quarterly, 31, 158
  11. 10.1177/0011128787033001002 · DOI
  12. 10.1080/07418825.2014.980838 · DOI
  13. 10.1375/acri.37.1.22 · DOI
  14. Braga, 2015, Rethinking the Compstat process to enhance problem-solving responses: insights from a randomized field experiment, Police Practice and Research, 16, 22, 10.1080/15614263.2013.832250 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.06.014 · DOI
  16. Simons, 1995, Control in an age of empowerment, Harvard Business Review, 73, 1
  17. Skolnick, 1987, Crime and Justice
  18. Bittner, 1980, The Functions of the Police in Modern Society
  19. 10.1177/0002716203262548 · DOI · Paper page
  20. De Maillard, J. , & Savage, S. P. (2017). Policing as a performing art: The contradictory nature of contemporary police performance management. Criminology and Criminal Justice, DOI 10.1177/1748895817718589. · DOI
  21. 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2003.tb00006.x · DOI · Paper page
  22. Silverman, 1999, NYPD Battles Crime: Innovative Strategies in Policing
  23. Willis, 2004, Compstat in Practice: An In-Depth Analysis of Three Cities
  24. 10.1108/13639511311329714 · DOI
  25. Merton, 1952, Reader in Bureaucracy
  26. Kelling, 1996, Fixing broken windows: Restoring order and reducing crime in our communities
  27. Di Lampedusa, 1991, The leopard
  28. Melnicoe, 1978, Elements of Police Supervision
  29. Mastrofski, 1998, How to Recognize Good Policing: Problems and Issues, 161
  30. McDonald, 2001, Managing Police Operations: Implementing the NYPD Crime Control Model Using COMPSTAT
  31. 2013, COMPSTAT: Its Origins, Evolution, and Future in Law Enforcement Agencies
  32. Henry, 2002, The COMPSTAT Paradigm: Management Accountability in Policing, Business, and the Public Sector
  33. Goldstein, 1990, Problem-Oriented Policing
  34. Willis, 2004, Compstat and Organizational Change in the Lowell Police Department: Challenges and Opportunities
  35. 10.1080/07418820400095871 · DOI
  36. 10.1080/10345329.1998.12036118 · DOI
  37. Davis, 1981, Critical Issues in Policing
  38. Bayley, 1994, Police for the Future, 10.1093/oso/9780195091168.001.0001 · DOI
  39. Bratton, 1998, Turnaround: How America’s Top Cop Reversed the Crime Epidemic
  40. 10.1177/1098611110384085 · DOI
  41. Anderson, 2001, Crime Control by the Numbers: Compstat Yields New Lessons for the Police and the Replication of a Good Idea. Ford Foundation Report, 5
  42. Eck, 2000, The Crime Drop in America
  43. 10.1108/13639510710753243 · DOI
  44. 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00294.x · DOI
  45. Greene, 1988, Community Policing: Rhetoric or Reality

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Weisburd, D., Willis, J. J., Mastrofski, S. D., & Greenspan, R.
Affiliations
George Mason University (US)
Venue
Police Innovation
Published
2019-08-29
Pages
417-436
OpenAlex
W4255127833
Cited by
4
References
2
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2020: 3
FWCI
10.04
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
Compstat, police performance management, crime reduction, police accountability, New York City Police Department, police administration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review