A Manifesto for Social Progress: Ideas for a Better Society
Abstract
At this time when many have lost hope amidst conflicts, terrorism, environmental destruction, economic inequality and the breakdown of democracy, this beautifully written book outlines how to rethink and reform our key institutions - markets, corporations, welfare policies, democratic processes and transnational governance - to create better societies based on core principles of human dignity, sustainability, and justice. This new vision is based on the findings of over 300 social scientists involved in the collaborative, interdisciplinary International Panel on Social Progress. Relying on state-of-the-art scholarship, these social scientists reviewed the desirability and possibility of all relevant forms of long-term social change, explored current challenges, and synthesized their knowledge on the principles, possibilities, and methods for improving the main institutions of modern societies. Their common finding is that a better society is indeed possible, its contours can be broadly described, and all we need is to gather forces toward realizing this vision.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fleurbaey et al. (2018) put the reform of the purpose and governance of the corporation among the key steps to cure the ills of 'capitalism' as we know it.
“Fleurbaey et al. (2018) similarly put the reform of the purpose and governance of the corporation among the key steps to cure the ills of 'capitalism' as we know it.”
From What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? (2021) · cites this paper as Fleurbaey et al. (2018)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 59 · Cited by 64
- Authors
- Fleurbaey, M., Bouin, O., Salles-Djelic, M.-L., Kanbur, R., Nowotny, H., Reis, E., & Sen, A.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques (FR)
- Cornell University (US)
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2018-08-30
- OpenAlex
- W2914573686
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 4.03
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Economic and Social Issues
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Policy and Reform Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Economic and Social Development
- Keywords
- social progress, social change, institutional reform, markets, corporations, welfare policy, democratic process, transnational governance, human dignity, sustainability, justice, long-term social change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review