What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy?
Open accessAbstract
Point of viewWhat is the business of business?Who said we had to be greedy?Marc FLEURBAEY 14 and Joost MINNAAR 15 Fifty years after Milton Friedman's influential critique of corporate social responsibility, this article re-examines whether the pursuit of profit can legitimately be the sole function of business in a good society.A division of labor is, indeed, possible between private and public institutions, freeing private agents from the whole burden of pursuing the social good, but only to a limited extent.In fact, Friedman was misread and betrayed, and he was much more cautious and open-minded than the apostles of greed would have been.The ongoing change in business culture is justified considering the prevailing interdependence among stakeholders and the pervasive externalities of economic activities.The new corporation is conscious of its influence on society and the environment. The corporation at a crossroadsIn a famous New York Times Magazine article, half a century years ago 16 , Milton Friedman (1970) cogently argued that the main business of business was profit-making.The influence of this piece on business school curricula and corporate management has been monumental.But half a century later, the Business Roundtable has signed on a new statement of purpose which sounds like a sharp rebuke of Friedman's legacy: "we share a fundamental commitment to all of our stakeholders."17 A change in how business sees its function in society is, indeed, urgent, and eminently feasible.Here is why.As the world faces multiple crises on many fronts, the modern corporation faces a reckoning.As Colin Mayer (2018) and Mariana Mazuccato (2018) remind us, the modern corporation is the descendant of associations granted privileges in view of their public function, such as "spreading civilization" to far away territories.It has been progressively privatized while retaining its privileges such as limited liability.This capture of a public institution by private interests has been a key driver of the "great 14 Economist, Research
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Fifty years after Milton Friedman’s article, this “point of view” piece argues that profit maximization cannot be the sole legitimate function of business in a good society, because firms are communities of contributors embedded in pervasive externalities. It contends that Friedman was more cautious than the apostles of greed, and that stakeholder-oriented, responsible management is both justified and already visible in real firms.
Key findings
- The standard “Friedman doctrine” is a misreading: Friedman allowed owners to pursue any non-malevolent goal, referenced “ethical custom” as a limit, and was not an advocate of selfishness or greed.
- The invisible-hand justification for selfish business behavior requires conditions that do not hold: perfect competition, no externalities, firms as mere nexuses of contracts, and shareholders as owners/residual claimants. In reality, market power, workplace interdependence, and externalities create special responsibilities.
- The authors propose that management should serve internal stakeholders in their common project while being responsible toward external stakeholders affected by externalities; for commercial firms, this means maximizing total value for stakeholders rather than only shareholder value.
- Illustrative cases include NER Group: 20 Spanish business projects, 1,300 staff, presence in 60 countries, over €400 million revenues, a maximum salary ratio of 2.3, at least 30% of profit shared with all workers, a €20,000 aid fund, 68 staff relocations between 2012 and 2015, and no economic dismissals. Other examples: Haier’s 70,000 staff reorganized into 4,000 microenterprises in 2013; Jaipur Rugs’ 40,000 artisans across 600 villages, 85% women; Buurtzorg’s over 15,000 workers with only 50 at headquarters and self-managing nurse teams of maximum 12.
Methods
- Design: normative/conceptual “point of view” article, not an empirical study; it re-reads Friedman and related thinkers (Smith, Rawls, Cohen, Singer, Nozick, Hart and Zingales) and develops an argument about corporate purpose and governance.
- Data/sample: no formal dataset or sample; the paper uses selected real-world business examples (NER Group, Haier Group, Jaipur Rugs, Buurtzorg) as illustrations.
- Main analysis: conceptual argument distinguishing two questions—when private agents may pursue self-interest, and when a corporation may maximize shareholder value instead of broader stakeholder value—then assessing the conditions under which the invisible hand would justify selfishness.
Limitations
- No formal limitations section is present. The text acknowledges that the common good is contentious, that no agreement exists on its definition, and that private charitable action may reflect conflicting views.
- Evident from the design: the argument is normative and relies on illustrative cases rather than systematic empirical evidence, so the examples cannot establish general causal claims.
- Evident from the text: the authors concede that government cannot optimally treat externalities and inequalities, and that private actors may need to contribute when public policy is limited or badly implemented.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
10 of 64 cited sources checked · 6 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation§ 8. The reality of the vision · p. 12
Between 2012 and 2015, 68 such relocations were performed in the NER Group.
“Between 2012 and 2015, 68 such relocations were performed (Sainz and Apellaniz, 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Sainz and Apellaniz, 2017 source
- Premisereasoning§ 8. The reality of the vision · p. 12
No person has ever been fired from the NER Group for economic reasons.
“This has resulted in the fact no person has ever been fired from the NER Group for economic reasons.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Sainz and Apellaniz, 2017 source
The Internal Adaptability section (page not provided) describes a promise of “no dismissals” and reports 68 voluntary relocations during difficult periods. That supports the group’s stated practice, but the paper does not establish the stronger historical claim that no one has ever been fired for economic reasons. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation§ 8. The reality of the vision · p. 12
The NER Group created an aid fund of €20,000 to help staff in sudden critical economic situations.
“The community also created an aid fund (€20,000) to help staff that finds themselves in a sudden critical economic situation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Sainz and Apellaniz, 2017 source
- Findingcitation§ 8. The reality of the vision · p. 12
There exist real-life examples of businesses that enforce management serving internal stakeholders while being responsible toward external stakeholders.
“Yes, there are. A most remarkable example of such a community of businesses is called the NER Group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Sainz and Apellaniz, 2017 source
- Premisereasoning§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? Marc FLEURBAEY and Joost MINNAAR · p. 13
Over the last 15 years, NER Group businesses have developed 150 initiatives with partners from the region to develop and strengthen the local community.
“As such, over the last 15 years, they have developed 150 initiatives with partners from the region to develop and strengthen the local community.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Sainz and Apellaniz, 2017 source
The External Adaptability section says ner Group organisations set aside resources for community social projects, supporting the general claim of local-community involvement. Section 5 dates the ner Group’s creation to 2010, but our copy does not report 150 initiatives, a 15-year period of such activity, or partnerships with regional organisations. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation§ 8. The reality of the vision · p. 12
NER Group businesses do not accept large salary differences within one business; the highest earner can earn no more than 2.3 times the salary of the lowest earner.
“The community of businesses, for example, do not accept the existence of large salary differences within one business, meaning that the highest earning can earn no more than 2.3 times the salary of the lowest earning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Sainz and Apellaniz, 2017 source
The Internal Adaptability section says ner seeks to reduce salary differences and does not accept more than five salary levels because large differences are undesirable. It does not give a highest-to-lowest salary ratio or support the specific 2.3-times ceiling. No page number is available for this passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisereasoning§ 8. The reality of the vision · p. 12
There is a solidary agreement between NER Group companies to voluntarily relocate staff to other businesses within the community for the duration of a critical situation, guaranteeing job security.
“This implies that there is a solidary agreement between the companies to voluntarily relocate staff to other businesses within the community for the time the critical situation lasts, guaranteeing job security for staff.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Sainz and Apellaniz, 2017 source
- Premisecitation§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? Marc FLEURBAEY and Joost MINNAAR · p. 13
NER Group businesses donate 2.5% of their profits and 2% of their staff's working time to community projects.
“The businesses donate 2.5% of their profits and 2% of their staff's working time to community projects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Sainz and Apellaniz, 2017 source
- Premisecitation§ 1. The corporation at a crossroads · p. 2
The modern corporation is the descendant of associations granted privileges in view of their public function, such as 'spreading civilization' to far away territories.
“As Colin Mayer (2018) and Mariana Mazuccato (2018) remind us, the modern corporation is the descendant of associations granted privileges in view of their public function, such as 'spreading civilization' to far away territories.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Mayer (2018)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Mazuccato (2018)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ 1. The corporation at a crossroads · p. 2
The modern corporation has been progressively privatized while retaining its privileges such as limited liability.
“It has been progressively privatized while retaining its privileges such as limited liability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Mayer (2018)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Mazuccato (2018)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 2. Reading Friedman · p. 4
Friedman was not truly opposed to CSR.
“He was not truly opposed to CSR; he only saw it as a dangerous trend vulnerable to all sorts of abuses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ 3. The invisible hand · p. 5
Even a liberal thinker like Friedman welcomes altruism and 'eleemosynary' initiatives.
“Therefore, even a liberal thinker like Friedman welcomes altruism and 'eleemosynary' initiatives.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Friedman (1970)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 2. Reading Friedman · p. 4
The business revolution around CSR and mission-driven enterprises (such as benefit corporations) appears perfectly compatible with the principles of a free society as envisioned by Friedman.
“Therefore, all the so-called business revolution that has come around the themes of CSR and mission-driven enterprises (such as benefit corporations) appears perfectly compatible with the principles of a free society as envisioned by Friedman.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ 2. Reading Friedman · p. 4
Friedman was not opposed to charity.
“Friedman was not opposed to charity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Friedman, 1962
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 2. Reading Friedman · p. 4
Even if employers tell a manager that their goal is profit, they cannot legitimately request a pursuit of profit that contravenes the relevant ethical norms.
“Even if his employers tell a manager that their goal is profit, they cannot legitimately request a pursuit of profit that contravenes with the relevant ethical norms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? · p. 3
The emergence of corporate giants in the global economy is triggering doubts about the sustainability of democracy in an integrated world.
“but also doubts about the sustainability of democracy in an integrated world (Rodrik, 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rodrik, 2011 source
- Interpretationreasoning§ 2. Reading Friedman · p. 4
Friedman saw CSR as a dangerous trend vulnerable to all sorts of abuses.
“He was not truly opposed to CSR; he only saw it as a dangerous trend vulnerable to all sorts of abuses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? · p. 3
Concentration of wealth and power at the top has been documented.
“Criticism is becoming louder nowadays as concentration of wealth and power at the top have been documented (Piketty, 2014; Zucman, 2016)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Piketty, 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Zucman, 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisereasoning§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? Marc FLEURBAEY and Joost MINNAAR · p. 9
Shareholders are the owners of their stocks but not of the firm.
“As a matter of legal fact, shareholders are the owners of their stocks but not of the firm.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 3. The invisible hand · p. 5
Smith saw the power of trade as a mechanism that fosters cooperation because it brings mutual benefits to the traders.
“He saw the power of trade as a mechanism that fosters cooperation because it brings mutual benefits to the traders.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Smith (1776)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? Marc FLEURBAEY and Joost MINNAAR · p. 9
The argument that shareholders should bear the risk and enjoy ultimate authority is self-contradictory for a community of workers making specific investments.
“Moreover, the argument that shareholders should bear the risk and enjoy the ultimate authority is self-contradictory for a community of workers making specific investments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 5. Requisites of the invisible hand · p. 8
The role of the markets is rather limited, being confined to the coordination of these activities and the diffusion of relevant information about demand and supply through prices.
“The role of the markets is rather limited, being confined to the coordination of these activities and the diffusion of relevant information about demand and supply through prices.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? Marc FLEURBAEY and Joost MINNAAR · p. 9
Delegating authority to someone else puts the worker at risk regarding job stability, working conditions, pay evolution, and similar matters.
“The very fact of delegating authority to someone else puts the worker at risk regarding the stability of the job, the working conditions, the evolution of the pay, and so on.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? Marc FLEURBAEY and Joost MINNAAR · p. 14
All other Buurtzorg employees are organized in thousands of highly autonomous self-managing teams of maximum 12 nurses.
“All other employees are organized in thousands of highly autonomous self-managing teams of maximum 12 nurses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 3. The invisible hand · p. 6
One cannot consider that the playing field is fair.
“This implies that one cannot consider that the playing field is fair, and therefore also implies that redistribution toward the most disadvantaged is warranted to some extent, at least to the extent that the most disadvantaged are, as a group, the most likely to descend from the victims of past crimes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 7. Consistency of micro and macro purposes · p. 11
Private charitable action is likely to reflect a tug of war between conflicting views of the common good.
“Private charitable action is then likely to reflect a tug of war between conflicting views of the common good.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The state is best equipped to take care of distribution, so that private agents could limit their interactions with strangers to market transactions.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 5. Requisites of the invisible hand · p. 8
If firms did not affect these communities, they could not bargain hefty subsidies to locate their activities in these places.
“If firms did not affect these communities, they could not bargain hefty subsidies to locate their activities in these places.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ 5. Requisites of the invisible hand · p. 8
A firm does not affect its workers if there are no exit costs for them, and if they are sure to find a similar job elsewhere.
“A firm does not affect its workers if there are no exit costs for them, and if they are sure to find a similar job elsewhere.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? Marc FLEURBAEY and Joost MINNAAR · p. 9
The argument that risk-bearers should have control applies sensibly only to pure contractors who are not interdependent in a common workplace.
“The argument would apply sensibly only to pure contractors who are not interdependent in a common workplace.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? Marc FLEURBAEY and Joost MINNAAR · p. 13
During the corona-crisis, Haier Group had its Chinese factories operating at full capacity again at the end of February 2020, when most Chinese manufacturers were only just beginning to restart production.
“In fact, during the corona-crisis Haier Group had its Chinese factories operating at full capacity again at the end of February 2020, at a time when most Chinese manufacturers were only just beginning to restart their production (Yu and Greeven, 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yu and Greeven, 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 5. Requisites of the invisible hand · p. 8
The above reasoning applies to businesses well only if a firm is just a nexus of contracts, not a workplace where people collaborate in hierarchies and with substantial specific investments in their collaboration.
“Another condition which has not been made explicit yet is that the above reasoning applies to businesses well only if a firm is just a nexus of contracts, not a workplace where people collaborate in hierarchies and with substantial specific investments in their collaboration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 5. Requisites of the invisible hand · p. 8
Even if a market economy would justify selfishness in transactions, assuming perfect competition, an economy in which most economic production takes place outside of the market in comparably small units (homes and workplaces) does create strong interdependence that calls for special responsibilities of those in charge in these units.
“Therefore, even if a market economy would justify selfishness in transactions, assuming perfect competition, an economy in which most economic production takes place outside of the market in comparably small units (homes and workplaces) does create strong interdependence that calls for special responsibilities of those in charge in these units.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? Marc FLEURBAEY and Joost MINNAAR · p. 9
The idea that shareholders are the residual claimants of the firm's revenue cannot be justified on the grounds that they own the firm.
“Therefore, the idea that the shareholders are the residual claimants of the firm's revenue, which was assumed in the above reasoning, cannot be justified on the grounds that they 'own' the firm.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? Marc FLEURBAEY and Joost MINNAAR · p. 13
In 2013, Haier Group, the largest white-goods manufacturer in the world, broke its hierarchical pyramid down to organize 70,000 staff into 4,000 microenterprises.
“In 2013 this Chinese firm, the largest white-goods manufacturer in the world, broke their hierarchical pyramid down to organize 70,000 staff into 4,000 so-called 'microenterprises'.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yu and Greeven, 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? Marc FLEURBAEY and Joost MINNAAR · p. 14
NER Group, Buurtzorg, Jaipur Rugs and Haier Group show a kind of management that maximizes both the value for internal stakeholders, especially workers, and the value for external stakeholders, the wider community.
“NER Group, Buurtzorg, Jaipur Rugs and the Haier Group show us a kind of management that maximizes both the value for internal stakeholders, especially the workers, as well as the value for the external stakeholders, the wider community.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? Marc FLEURBAEY and Joost MINNAAR · p. 9
For contractors, a contract with fixed payment justifies transferring decisions affecting the venture's success as much as possible to the risk-bearer to avoid moral hazard.
“For contractors, a contract with fixed payment justifies that the decisions affecting the success of the venture be transferred as much as possible to the risk-bearer to avoid moral hazard.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? Marc FLEURBAEY and Joost MINNAAR · p. 7
In absence of free entry but still assuming perfect competition, there is a direct impact of business choices on shareholders, since they receive pure profit.
“In absence of free entry, but still assuming perfect competition, there is a direct impact of the business choices on shareholders, since they are the receivers of the pure profit”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Perfect competition prevails in the market economy under consideration.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 71
- May combine two claims. 43
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ 5. Requisites of the invisible hand · p. 8The pervasiveness of externalities justifies the principle that managers should pursue the welfare of the shareholders rather than their monetary returns.
“The pervasiveness of externalities, according to Hart and Zingales (2017), justifies the principle that managers should pursue the welfare of the shareholders rather than their monetary returns.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Hart and Zingales (2017) source
The Introduction argues that shareholder welfare is broader than market value and that shareholders may care about externalities. But the paper’s case for managers pursuing shareholder welfare depends on shareholders having social concerns and on externalities not being separable from production decisions; the pervasiveness of externalities alone is not its stated justification. Our copy provides section labels but no page numbers for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 5. Requisites of the invisible hand · p. 8Typical shareholders do care about externalities and therefore focusing on a narrow bottom line is not appropriate.
“By this, they mean that typical shareholders do care about these externalities and therefore focusing on a narrow bottom”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Hart and Zingales (2017) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ 2. Reading Friedman · p. 4It is hard to reconcile the duty to maximize profit with a duty to keep prices low for customers and wages high for workers.
“It is, however, hard to reconcile the duty to maximize profit with a duty to keep prices low for customers and wages high for workers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ Marc FLEURBAEY 14 and Joost MINNAAR 15 · p. 2A division of labor is possible between private and public institutions, freeing private agents from the whole burden of pursuing the social good, but only to a limited extent.
“A division of labor is, indeed, possible between private and public institutions, freeing private agents from the whole burden of pursuing the social good, but only to a limited extent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ Marc FLEURBAEY 14 and Joost MINNAAR 15 · p. 2The new corporation is conscious of its influence on society and the environment.
“The new corporation is conscious of its influence on society and the environment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2. Reading Friedman · p. 4Friedman's usually quoted statement only refers to deception or fraud as the red line not to cross, whereas the quoted passage refers to the 'basic rules of the society, both those embodied in law and those embodied in ethical custom'.
“while the usually quoted statement only refers to deception or fraud as the red line not to cross, the above quote refers to the 'basic rules of the society, both those embodied in law and those embodied in ethical custom'.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Friedman (1970)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ 2. Reading Friedman · p. 4The reference to ethical custom opens the door to environmental, social and governance norms that are usually at the core of the current understanding of corporate social responsibility (CSR).
“The reference to ethical custom opens the door to environmental, social and governance norms that are usually at the core of the current understanding of corporate social responsibility (CSR).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 2. Reading Friedman · p. 4Friedman accuses the socially responsible manager of acting as a tax authority that takes money away from others, without their consent, to use it for purposes that are not aligned with theirs.
“Friedman accuses the socially responsible manager to act as a tax authority that takes money away from others, without their consent, to use it for purposes that are not aligned with theirs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Friedman (1970)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 1. The corporation at a crossroads · p. 2As the world faces multiple crises on many fronts, the modern corporation faces a reckoning.
“As the world faces multiple crises on many fronts, the modern corporation faces a reckoning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? Marc FLEURBAEY and Joost MINNAAR · p. 5For Friedman, a free society was not a society in which everyone should be encouraged to think only of one's own interest and to conceive of one's interest in purely material terms.
“A free society, for him, was not a society in which everyone should be encouraged to think only of one's own interest and to conceive of one's interest in purely material terms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationcitation§ 2. Reading Friedman · p. 4Friedman clearly explains that in a free society, the creators or owners of a corporation may have any goal (provided it is not malevolent, obviously), from sole profit to pure charity, and presumably all nuances in between.
“In fact, Friedman clearly explains that in a free society, the creators or owners of a corporation may have any goal (provided it is not malevolent, obviously), from sole profit to pure charity, and presumably all nuances in between.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Friedman, 1970
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1. The corporation at a crossroads · p. 2Half a century later, the Business Roundtable has signed on a new statement of purpose which sounds like a sharp rebuke of Friedman's legacy: 'we share a fundamental commitment to all of our stakeholders.'
“But half a century later, the Business Roundtable has signed on a new statement of purpose which sounds like a sharp rebuke of Friedman's legacy: 'we share a fundamental commitment to all of our stakeholders.'”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites https://opportunity.businessroundtable.org/ourcommitment/
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationcitation§ 2. Reading Friedman · p. 3The beginning of that op-ed brings a few key nuances that are quietly ignored by many adepts of the doctrine.
“But the beginning of that op-ed brings a few key nuances that are quietly ignored by many adepts of the doctrine.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Friedman, 1970
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? · p. 3Colm Kelly (2019) reviews the arguments and ongoing initiatives for a re-alignment of the corporation with larger societal goals.
“Colm Kelly (2019) reviews the arguments and ongoing initiatives for a re-alignment of the corporation with larger societal goals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kelly (2019)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ Marc FLEURBAEY 14 and Joost MINNAAR 15 · p. 2Friedman was misread and betrayed.
“In fact, Friedman was misread and betrayed, and he was much more cautious and open-minded than the apostles of greed would have been.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Friedman (1962)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Friedman (1970)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationcitation§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? · p. 3Adjusting the purpose, the governance and the reporting of the corporation would enable to step back from profit maximization (while retaining the imperative of financial sustainability) and paid greater attention to broader social and environmental goals.
“Adjusting the purpose, the governance and the reporting of the corporation would enable to step back from profit maximization (while retaining the imperative of financial sustainability) and paid greater attention to broader social and environmental goals”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kelly (2019)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? · p. 3The corporation has been a great source of social progress.
“and the corporation has been a great source of social progress.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Deaton 2013
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ 2. Reading Friedman · p. 4Friedman's statement that a corporate executive spending on social or environmental causes on his own initiative would be spending someone else's money for a general social interest is inconsistent with the principle that the sole duty of the manager is toward his employers.
“This is of course inconsistent with the principle that the sole duty of the manager is toward his employers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ 2. Reading Friedman · p. 3Carefully reading Friedman raises doubts about his alleged influence.
“But carefully reading him raises doubts about his alleged influence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Milton Friedman may have crystallized a specific corporate culture and shaped the teaching in many business schools.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ 1. The corporation at a crossroads · p. 2Milton Friedman (1970) cogently argued that the main business of business was profit-making.
“Milton Friedman (1970) cogently argued that the main business of business was profit-making.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Friedman (1970)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ 3. The invisible hand · p. 5Adam Smith's 'invisible hand' allegory is being cited a lot, but Smith himself was making a quite limited (and reasonable) claim.
“Incidentally, although Adam Smith's 'invisible hand' allegory is being cited a lot, Smith himself was making a quite limited (and reasonable) claim.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Smith (1776)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 1. The corporation at a crossroads · p. 2A change in how business sees its function in society is urgent and eminently feasible.
“A change in how business sees its function in society is, indeed, urgent, and eminently feasible.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The corporation has always been associated with complaints about its inhumane treatment of workers and its irresponsible overuse of the environment.
- Rests on an assumption: Ideas such as the primacy of shareholders, the pursuit of profit, and the celebration of greed as the engine of prosperity have always met serious skepticism and opposition.
- Rests on an assumption: The emergence of corporate giants in the global economy is triggering questions about their behavior (such as tax evasion).
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 3. The invisible hand · p. 5In a society made of isolated islands with no communication between them, selfishness is totally aligned with the general good.
“Consider a society made of isolated islands with no communication between them. The only way in which an island can contribute to the overall good is through thriving by itself. Selfishness is then totally aligned with the general good.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ Marc FLEURBAEY 14 and Joost MINNAAR 15 · p. 2The ongoing change in business culture is justified considering the prevailing interdependence among stakeholders and the pervasive externalities of economic activities.
“The ongoing change in business culture is justified considering the prevailing interdependence among stakeholders and the pervasive externalities of economic activities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationcitation§ 2. Reading Friedman · p. 3The first important qualification of the doctrine is that it all comes from the duty of the manager, as an employee, to pursue the interests of the owners of the firm.
“The first important qualification of the doctrine is that it all comes from the duty of the manager, as an employee, to pursue the interests of the owners of the firm.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Friedman, 1970
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? Marc FLEURBAEY and Joost MINNAAR · p. 5Friedman was not an advocate of selfishness and greed.
“What is truly clear, at any rate, is that Friedman was not an advocate of selfishness and greed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? · p. 3A reform of the corporation appears likely.
“A reform of the corporation appears likely.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ 2. Reading Friedman · p. 4There is another part of Friedman's text that suggests that the responsibility of the manager is not only toward the shareholders.
“Moreover, there is another part of the text that suggests that the responsibility of the manager is not only toward the shareholders.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Friedman (1970)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationcitation§ Marc FLEURBAEY 14 and Joost MINNAAR 15 · p. 2Friedman was much more cautious and open-minded than the apostles of greed would have been.
“In fact, Friedman was misread and betrayed, and he was much more cautious and open-minded than the apostles of greed would have been.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Friedman (1962)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Friedman (1970)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationcitation§ 2. Reading Friedman · p. 4This pulls the rug from under the feet of the advocates of profit as the sole goal of business.
“This pulls the rug from under the feet of the advocates of profit as the sole goal of business.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? · p. 3Fleurbaey et al. (2018) put the reform of the purpose and governance of the corporation among the key steps to cure the ills of 'capitalism' as we know it.
“Fleurbaey et al. (2018) similarly put the reform of the purpose and governance of the corporation among the key steps to cure the ills of 'capitalism' as we know it.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fleurbaey et al. (2018) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? · p. 3Criticism is becoming louder nowadays.
“Criticism is becoming louder nowadays”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The emergence of corporate giants in the global economy is triggering questions about their behavior (such as tax evasion).
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ 7. Consistency of micro and macro purposes · p. 11Firms' capacity of coordination and administrative functions provide great assets for actions that households cannot easily initiate or can initiate only through specific organizations.
“Their capacity of coordination and their administrative functions provide great assets for actions that households cannot easily initiate or can initiate only through specific organizations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The state is best equipped to take care of distribution, so that private agents could limit their interactions with strangers to market transactions.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 8. The reality of the vision · p. 12NER Group businesses leverage each other's strengths, knowledge and resources when needed, and share and relocate workers when businesses in the community are in need.
“The businesses also leverage each other's strengths, knowledge and resources when needed. They even share and relocate workers when businesses in the community are in need.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sainz and Apellaniz, 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? Marc FLEURBAEY and Joost MINNAAR · p. 7The only economic agents affected by the decisions of the firm are the shareholders, and their interest is that profit be maximized.
“So here we see that the only economic agents affected by the decisions of the firm are the shareholders, and their interest is that profit be maximized.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Perfect competition prevails in the market economy under consideration.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? Marc FLEURBAEY and Joost MINNAAR · p. 13Similar kinds of organizations are popping up all around the world, in all kinds of sectors, and from all sizes.
“In fact, we can find similar kinds of organizations popping up all around the world, in all kinds of sectors, and from all sizes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? Marc FLEURBAEY and Joost MINNAAR · p. 14These examples show consistency in serving both the micro and macro purposes of the firm, even at large scales.
“They serve as examples of how to show a consistency in serving both the micro and macro purposes of the firm. Even at large scales.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 3. The invisible hand · p. 6Peter Singer adopts a fundamentalist Benthamite approach in which, ideally, everyone should sacrifice oneself up to the point where one's marginal utility equals the highest marginal utility in society (i.e., up to the point when one belongs to the most deprived category).
“The most extreme along these lines is probably Peter Singer (2009), who adopts a fundamentalist Benthamite approach in which, ideally, everyone should sacrifice oneself up to the point where one's marginal utility equals the highest marginal utility in society ( i.e. , up to the point when one belongs to the most deprived category).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Singer (2009)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? Marc FLEURBAEY and Joost MINNAAR · p. 10The main difference between the authors' view and Friedman is that internal stakeholders include other parties than shareholders, and that externalities impose special responsibilities and duties.
“The main difference with Friedman is only that the internal stakeholders include other parties than the shareholders, and that externalities impose special responsibilities and duties.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Friedman
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 8. The reality of the vision · p. 12The NER Group businesses differ in legal status (cooperatives, private limited firms, non-profit organizations) and in size (from a few to several hundred members).
“The businesses differ in their legal status from cooperatives, private limited firms, and even non-profit organizations. And they differ in size, ranging from just a few to several hundred members.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sainz and Apellaniz, 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? Marc FLEURBAEY and Joost MINNAAR · p. 13Some examples show the potential of scaling this approach to communities consisting of tens of thousands of stakeholders.
“Some of those examples show us the potential of scaling this approach to communities consisting of tens of thousands of stakeholders.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? Marc FLEURBAEY and Joost MINNAAR · p. 13Haier's microenterprises are small, autonomous companies run by staff, who are solely responsible for the provision of products and services.
“These are small, autonomous companies run by the staff. In fact, the staff, or entrepreneurs as they are referred to, are solely responsible for the provision of products and services.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yu and Greeven, 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 5. Requisites of the invisible hand · p. 8Businesses are communities of collaboration of different contributors with diverse interests and aspirations, and they cannot hide behind the market to shed their special responsibilities to all their members.
“Businesses are communities of collaboration of different contributors with diverse interests and aspirations, and they cannot hide behind the market to shed their special responsibilities to all their members.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ 3. The invisible hand · p. 6The idea that selfishness is justified appears outlandish in a society with injustices needing repair and with strong interdependence between its members.
“While the idea that selfishness is justified appears outlandish in a society with injustices needing repair and with strong interdependence between its members, it is nevertheless worth exploring if, under certain suitable institutions, it may become acceptable, as Rawls believed for the fair institutional structure he theorized.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: We are not a society of isolated islands.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 7. Consistency of micro and macro purposes · p. 11Externalities cannot be fully addressed by government regulation.
“We have already answered a similar question relative to the externalities, which cannot be fully addressed by government regulation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 8. The reality of the vision · p. 12The NER Group's humanistic model advocates people sharing in decision-making and working in an environment of transparency, communication, trust, responsibility, ethics, solidarity and freedom.
“The micro purpose of the humanistic model of the NER group advocates for people to share in decision-making and to work in 'an environment of transparency, communication, trust, responsibility, ethics, solidarity and freedom' (Sainz and Apellaniz, 2017, p.2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sainz and Apellaniz, 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
The quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ 4. The market economy · p. 6In a perfectly competitive market economy with a suitable welfare state, market interactions can be guided legitimately entirely by self-interest, because agents cannot affect others except through non-market actions such as gifts.
“In such a case, these market interactions can be guided, legitimately, entirely by self-interest.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Perfect competition prevails in the market economy under consideration.
- The authors state this as an assumption: An optimal welfare state exists.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Gifts and similar eleemosynary acts by individual agents are not as effective as redistribution by the welfare state.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 8. The reality of the vision · p. 12In the NER Group, sharing of profit with all is non-negotiable and proportional to salary level, with a minimum of 30% shared with all workers.
“Moreover, the sharing of profit with all is non-negotiable and proportional to the salary level, with a minimum of 30% being shared with all workers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sainz and Apellaniz, 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 8. The reality of the vision · p. 12Despite their differences, NER Group businesses share one project and consider people the most important and valuable aspect of their organizations.
“But despite their differences they all do 'share one project and consider people to be the most important and valuable aspect of their organizations'.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sainz and Apellaniz, 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 3. The invisible hand · p. 5Smith did not claim that the resulting allocation was optimal.
“But he did not claim that the resulting allocation was optimal, only that it brought benefit to all parties and created prosperity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Smith (1776)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3. The invisible hand · p. 5Smith claimed that trade brought benefit to all parties and created prosperity.
“But he did not claim that the resulting allocation was optimal, only that it brought benefit to all parties and created prosperity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Smith (1776)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 5. Requisites of the invisible hand · p. 8The firm is not a market; it is precisely formed because long-term non-market coordination is more efficient to lower transaction costs and build up the necessary investments in know-how and methods that make its brand.
“The firm is not a market. It is precisely formed because long-term non-market coordination is more efficient to lower transaction costs and build up the necessary investments in know-how and methods that make its brand.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? Marc FLEURBAEY and Joost MINNAAR · p. 9It makes no sense to argue that workers bear no risk and therefore should work under the authority of a boss, because hierarchical authority itself carries substantial risks.
“It makes no sense to argue that workers bear no risk and therefore should work under the authority of a boss, which by itself carries substantial risks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? Marc FLEURBAEY and Joost MINNAAR · p. 13Of Jaipur Rugs' weaver community, 85% are women and most are from the untouchable caste, India's poorest and most marginalized class of citizens.
“Of Jaipur Rugs' weaver community 85% are women and most are from the untouchable caste, India's poorest and most marginalized class of citizens.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 7. Consistency of micro and macro purposes · p. 11Friedman proposes that philanthropy is better done by individuals than by corporations, but whether this is true can depend on the context and the type of action considered.
“Friedman proposes that philanthropy is better done by individuals than by corporations, but this can depend on the context and the type of action considered.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Friedman
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The state is best equipped to take care of distribution, so that private agents could limit their interactions with strangers to market transactions.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationcitation§ 3. The invisible hand · p. 5Smith was too optimistic about the frugality of the rich, claiming that they consume not much more than everybody else.
“He was too optimistic, though, about the frugality of the rich, claiming that they consume not much more than everybody else.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Smith (1759)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone given§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? Marc FLEURBAEY and Joost MINNAAR · p. 13Jaipur Rugs' mission is to make clear that their artisans' and their communities' welfare comes before profit and growth.
“It is Jaipur Rugs' mission to make it clear that their artisans' and their communities' welfare comes before profit and growth.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? Marc FLEURBAEY and Joost MINNAAR · p. 10This subservience is ultimately unhealthy for workers and undermines the productivity and effectiveness of the whole organization.
“It is ultimately unhealthy for the workers and it undermines the productivity and effectiveness of the whole organization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? Marc FLEURBAEY and Joost MINNAAR · p. 10There are conflicting interests between various stakeholders, but the conflict between workers and equity holders is not necessarily more severe than the conflict between shareholders with different purposes or beliefs about optimal strategies.
“Of course, there are conflicting interests between the various stakeholders, but the conflict between workers and equity holders is not necessarily more severe than the conflict between shareholders with different purposes or different beliefs about optimal strategies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 3. The invisible hand · p. 6Gerald Cohen objected to Rawls's moderate conception of justice, noting that talented people are somehow blackmailing the less advantaged by refusing to deploy their talents unless they receive special privileges in the form of low marginal tax rates.
“Gerald Cohen (2000) famously objected to this moderate conception of justice, noting that talented people are somehow blackmailing the less advantaged by refusing to deploy their talents unless they receive special privileges in the form of low marginal tax rates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cohen (2000)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 4. The market economy · p. 6For a business in perfect competition, there is no impact of its actions on its suppliers, workers, and customers, because if it did not exist, they would do similar transactions at the same prices and wages with other businesses.
“For a business, similarly, there is no impact of its action on its suppliers, workers, and customers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Perfect competition prevails in the market economy under consideration.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Premisereasoning§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? Marc FLEURBAEY and Joost MINNAAR · p. 14As a result, Jaipur Rugs' independent artisans get fair and timely pay, which supports and develops their local communities.
“As a result, the independent artisans get fair and timely pay. This gives them not only an opportunity to make a better living for themselves and their family, but also supports and develops their local communities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? Marc FLEURBAEY and Joost MINNAAR · p. 13Jaipur Rugs, founded in 1978, employs 40,000 independent artisans spread across 600 villages of India.
“Founded in 1978 this organization now employs 40,000 independent artisans, spread across 600 villages of India.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 3. The invisible hand · p. 6Rawls accepted the classical equity-efficiency dilemma and allowed inequalities to emerge from the incentive constraints of labor markets and taxation mechanisms.
“He accepted the classical equity-efficiency dilemma and allowed inequalities to emerge from the incentive constraints of labor markets and taxation mechanisms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rawls (1971) source
May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ 5. Requisites of the invisible hand · p. 7The economy is far from perfectly competitive; firms have considerable market power in both output and input markets.
“In the time of the GAFA (Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon), as it was in the time of the robber barons or more recently of Bell and its babies, the economy is far from perfectly competitive. Especially, firms have considerable market power, not just on their output markets but also on their input markets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 5. Requisites of the invisible hand · p. 7Maximizing profit through market power generates a deadweight loss, and enriching shareholders at the expense of customers, suppliers and workers is unlikely to contribute to societal well-being, given that shareholders are often among the wealthiest.
“Maximizing profit through market power generates a deadweight loss, and enriching shareholders at the expense of customers, suppliers and workers is unlikely to contribute to societal well-being, given that shareholders are often among the wealthiest”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? Marc FLEURBAEY and Joost MINNAAR · p. 7In perfect competition with free entry, all shares get the same market return and there is no pure profit, because any pure profit attracts competitors and drives the price down.
“In the case of perfect competition with free entry, all shares get the same market return and there is no pure profit, because any pure profit attracts competitors and drives the price down.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Perfect competition prevails in the market economy under consideration.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3. The invisible hand · p. 5In Theory of Moral Sentiments, Smith noticed that trade has some redistributive properties, because employers pay employees and lift them out of poverty, producing a situation in which household consumption is much less unequal than it would be in absence of such trades on the labor market.
“In the Theory of Moral Sentiments , Smith (1759) also noticed that trade has some redistributive properties, because employers pay employees and lift them out of poverty, producing a situation in which household consumption is much less unequal than it would be in absence of such trades on the labor market.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Smith (1759)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 5. Requisites of the invisible hand · p. 8The same can be said, to a lesser extent, about the suppliers in regular relation with the firm, and of the communities in which the firms and their suppliers operate.
“The same can be said, to a lesser extent, about the suppliers in regular relation with the firm, and of the communities in which the firms and their suppliers operate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: This is not true for most workers; they strongly depend on the stability of their job and working conditions, and even the wage is not set anonymously by the market but bargained over and regularly adjusted.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? Marc FLEURBAEY and Joost MINNAAR · p. 14Buurtzorg, founded in 2006, now employs over 15,000 workers, of which just 50 are in headquarters.
“Buurtzorg has been rapidly scaling since its founding in 2006, and now employs over 15,000 workers of which there are just 50 people in their headquarters.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? Marc FLEURBAEY and Joost MINNAAR · p. 10Benefit corporations are not special and are part of the ecology of business alongside more ordinary commercial firms.
“In this inclusive vision of corporate purpose, benefit corporations are not special and are part of the ecology of business alongside more ordinary commercial firms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 3. The invisible hand · p. 6Singer does not seek to impose this sacrifice on everyone here and now.
“Singer, however, does not seek to impose this sacrifice on everyone here and now, and only insists that the world would be a better place if everyone made a moderate effort in that direction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Singer (2009)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? Marc FLEURBAEY and Joost MINNAAR · p. 10Conflicts among stakeholders make the concept of 'the interests of stakeholders in the pursuit of their business purpose' hard to substantiate precisely.
“Such conflicts make the concept of 'the interests of stakeholders in the pursuit of their business purpose' hard to substantiate precisely.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 5. Requisites of the invisible hand · p. 8If one adds up the unpaid housework that represents up to 50% of GDP, one could say that, by far, most of the economic activity is non-market.
“If one adds up the unpaid housework that represents up to 50% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), one could say that, by far, most of the economic activity is non-market.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Unpaid housework represents up to 50% of GDP.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisereasoning§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? Marc FLEURBAEY and Joost MINNAAR · p. 13Jaipur Rugs eliminates exploitative middlemen and steers those profits directly back to local weaver communities.
“They do this by eliminating the exploitative middlemen (who took profits out of the system) and steer those profits directly back to the local weaver communities that do the actual work.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 8. The reality of the vision · p. 12The NER Group comprises 1,300 staff, has a presence in 60 countries, and total revenues over €400 million.
“Alltogether this community of business projects comprises of 1,300 staff, has a presence in 60 countries and its total revenues extend over €400 million.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sainz and Apellaniz, 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ Conclusion: What remains of greed? · p. 14The purpose of generating income remains legitimate to a large extent.
“The purpose of generating income remains legitimate to a large extent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ 3. The invisible hand · p. 6Redistribution toward the most disadvantaged is warranted to some extent, at least to the extent that the most disadvantaged are, as a group, the most likely to descend from the victims of past crimes.
“This implies that one cannot consider that the playing field is fair, and therefore also implies that redistribution toward the most disadvantaged is warranted to some extent, at least to the extent that the most disadvantaged are, as a group, the most likely to descend from the victims of past crimes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The most disadvantaged are, as a group, the most likely to descend from the victims of past crimes.
May combine two claims.
Premisereasoning§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? Marc FLEURBAEY and Joost MINNAAR · p. 14Buurtzorg's self-governing nurse teams are highly rooted in local communities and leverage all available resources to service local clients.
“Those self-governing nurse teams are highly rooted in their local communities and leverage all resources available to service their local clients as best as they can.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 7. Consistency of micro and macro purposes · p. 11No agreement exists about the definition of the common good, and this by itself makes it impossible for the government to treat externalities and inequalities optimally in the eyes of everyone.
“The fact that no agreement exists about the definition of the common good, by itself, makes it impossible for the government to treat externalities and inequalities optimally in the eyes of everyone.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The state is best equipped to take care of distribution, so that private agents could limit their interactions with strangers to market transactions.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ 7. Consistency of micro and macro purposes · p. 11The alignment of private goals and the common good seems out of reach given that the definition of the common good is itself a very contentious issue.
“One difficulty with the imperfect world in which both externalities and inequalities are not optimally addressed by the government and can be further alleviated by private actors is that the alignment of private goals and the common good seems out of reach given that the definition of the common good is itself a very contentious issue.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The state is best equipped to take care of distribution, so that private agents could limit their interactions with strangers to market transactions.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? Marc FLEURBAEY and Joost MINNAAR · p. 10This double standard is cynical and ultimately self-defeating.
“This double standard is very natural for people in positions of authority, but quite cynical and ultimately selfdefeating.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? Marc FLEURBAEY and Joost MINNAAR · p. 13Haier's corporate transformation boosted worker engagement and made the whole organization more resilient.
“This corporate transformation did not only boost the engagement levels of the workers but also made the whole organization more resilient.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yu and Greeven, 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? Marc FLEURBAEY and Joost MINNAAR · p. 14Buurtzorg has earned high patient and employee ratings and appears to provide high-quality home care at lower cost than any other competitor organization.
“Buurtzorg has earned high patient and employee ratings and appears to provide high-quality home care at lower cost than any other competitor organization 18 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationcitation§ Conclusion: What remains of greed? · p. 14Most businesses in an affluent economy will have larger goals involving the well-being of stakeholders and, beyond internal stakeholders, societal harmony as well as sustainability.
“But, just as Friedman suggested, income generation is just one possible goal, and most businesses in an affluent economy will have larger goals involving the well-being of the stakeholders and, beyond internal stakeholders, societal harmony as well as sustainability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Friedman
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3. The invisible hand · p. 6Rawls believed that individuals were required to support the just institutions, but within these settled rules of the game, were licensed to pursue their personal interest.
“philosopher John Rawls (1971) believed that individuals were required to support the just institutions, but within these settled rules of the game, were licensed to pursue their personal interest.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rawls (1971) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 3. The invisible hand · p. 6Singer insists that the world would be a better place if everyone made a moderate effort in that direction.
“Singer, however, does not seek to impose this sacrifice on everyone here and now, and only insists that the world would be a better place if everyone made a moderate effort in that direction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Singer (2009)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 8. The reality of the vision · p. 12The NER Group is a community of businesses founded on 2 November 2010, consisting of 20 Spanish business projects located in Gipuzkoa and Biscay.
“This community of businesses, founded on 2 November 2010, consist of 20 Spanish business projects located in the historic areas of Gipuzkoa and Biscay.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sainz and Apellaniz, 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? Marc FLEURBAEY and Joost MINNAAR · p. 10Such desired subservience is perverse and generates a context that fosters abuse and harassment on one side, and servility and insecurity on the other.
“Such a desired subservience is perverse and generates a context that fosters abuse and harassment on one side, servility, and insecurity on the other side.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 7. Consistency of micro and macro purposes · p. 11While giving money may be easy for individuals and households, setting up more ambitious charitable action may be more easily coordinated by a large community, and firms may have such resources at their disposal.
“While giving money may be easy for individuals and households, setting up more ambitious charitable action may be more easily coordinated by a large community and firms may have such resources at their disposal.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The state is best equipped to take care of distribution, so that private agents could limit their interactions with strangers to market transactions.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? Marc FLEURBAEY and Joost MINNAAR · p. 10Workers cannot trust an environment that simultaneously tells them they have no say and that their engagement is dearly sought.
“Workers cannot trust an environment that simultaneously tells them that they have no say and that their engagement is dearly sought.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 7. Consistency of micro and macro purposes · p. 11There is generally agreement about a list of relevant social issues, so private charitable actions can improve the social situation in the eyes of most observers.
“These sobering considerations should not, however, be considered overwhelming, because there is generally agreement about a list of relevant social issues, so that private charitable actions can improve the social situation in the eyes of most observers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The state is best equipped to take care of distribution, so that private agents could limit their interactions with strangers to market transactions.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Point of view: What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? Marc FLEURBAEY and Joost MINNAAR · p. 13Haier microenterprises must collaborate with other microenterprises in Ecosystem Micro Communities (EMCs), and EMC contracts are signed tied to the performance of their own microcommunity.
“They need to collaborate with other micro-enterprises in so-called 'Ecosystem Micro Communities' (EMCs). There are even 'EMC contracts' signed, tied to the performance of their own 'microcommunity'.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yu and Greeven, 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 8. The reality of the vision · p. 12NER Group businesses operate as autonomous businesses but share common values and rules around internal and external solidarity.
“To achieve such humane internalities the businesses in the community operate as autonomous businesses but share common values and rules around internal and external solidarity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sainz and Apellaniz, 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ Conclusion: What remains of greed? · p. 14There is no reason to stick to the perverse vision that prosperity can only come from the promotion of a vice.
“Clearly, there is no reason to stick to the perverse vision that prosperity can only come from the promotion of a vice.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Friedman's 1970 article had monumental influence on business school curricula and corporate management.
“The influence of this piece on business school curricula and corporate management has been monumental.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The corporation has always been associated with complaints about its inhumane treatment of workers and its irresponsible overuse of the environment.
“But it has also always been associated with complaints about its inhumane treatment of workers and its irresponsible overuse of the environment.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Ideas such as the primacy of shareholders, the pursuit of profit, and the celebration of greed as the engine of prosperity have always met serious skepticism and opposition.
“At the confluence of the debates about the corporation, ideas such as the primacy of shareholders, the pursuit of profit, and the celebration of greed as the engine of prosperity, have always met serious skepticism and opposition.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Milton Friedman may have crystallized a specific corporate culture and shaped the teaching in many business schools.
“Milton Friedman may have crystallized a specific corporate culture and shaped the teaching in many business schools.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The emergence of corporate giants in the global economy is triggering questions about their behavior (such as tax evasion).
“and the emergence of corporate giants in the global economy is triggering not only questions about their behavior (such as tax evasion)”
The paper relies on this without support.
We are not a society of isolated islands.
“Are we a society of isolated islands? We are not.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Friedman's doctrine is used by advocates of unashamed greed.
“How, then, could Friedman's doctrine be used by the advocates of unashamed greed?”
The paper relies on this without support.
The most disadvantaged are, as a group, the most likely to descend from the victims of past crimes.
“at least to the extent that the most disadvantaged are, as a group, the most likely to descend from the victims of past crimes.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Perfect competition prevails in the market economy under consideration.
“Consider a market economy in which perfect competition prevails, as well as a few other conditions to be detailed later.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
An optimal welfare state exists.
“Apart from the existence of an optimal welfare state, the only condition that has been explicitly mentioned is perfect competition.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Gifts and similar eleemosynary acts by individual agents are not as effective as redistribution by the welfare state.
“Now suppose that gifts and similar 'eleemosynary' acts by individual agents are not as effective as redistribution by the welfare state”
The paper relies on this without support.
Returns to scale prevail in many sectors.
“Returns to scale prevail in many sectors and make it difficult to reconcile private interest and the collective good.”
The paper relies on this without support.
After the Bork doctrine prevailed in the USA, a considerable degree of laissez-faire in antitrust policy and an equally considerable degree of market concentration have ensued.
“After the Bork doctrine prevailed in the USA, a considerable degree of laissez-faire in antitrust policy and an equally considerable degree of market concentration have ensued.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Even if antitrust action were much more ambitious than it has been in recent decades, there would still be market power in local markets, even for medium-sized firms.
“But even if antitrust action were much more ambitious than it has been in the recent decades, there would still be market power in local markets, even for medium-sized firms.”
The paper relies on this without support.
This is not true for most workers; they strongly depend on the stability of their job and working conditions, and even the wage is not set anonymously by the market but bargained over and regularly adjusted.
“This is not true for most workers. They strongly depend on the stability of their job and of the working conditions that the managers grant them. Even the wage is not set anonymously by the market but bargained over and regularly adjusted.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Unpaid housework represents up to 50% of GDP.
“If one adds up the unpaid housework that represents up to 50% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP)”
The paper relies on this without support.
In the case of greenhouse gases, the externalities will mainly be felt by people who are not even born yet.
“In the case of greenhouse gases, the externalities will mainly be felt by people who are not even born yet.”
The paper relies on this without support.
While the government can do a lot in this respect, little of what it could do is done, and even if it tried, there would always remain a host of influences that would be difficult to track and properly curb or incentivize.
“While the government can do a lot in this respect, little of what it could do is done, and even if it tried, there would always remain a host of influences that would be difficult to track and properly curb or incentivize.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The state is best equipped to take care of distribution, so that private agents could limit their interactions with strangers to market transactions.
“We have assumed earlier that the state was best equipped to take care of the distribution, so that private agents could limit their interactions with strangers to market transactions.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Zucman citation year differs from reference
MinorThe text cites Zucman as 2016, while the reference list gives 2015.
“(Piketty, 2014; Zucman, 2016)”
“Zucman G. (2015), The Hidden Wealth of Nations. The Scourge of Tax Havens , Chicago, University of Chicago Press.”
Cites
Rawls, J. (1971) · Princeton Readings in Political Thought · doi:10.4324/9781315097176-4 · Cited by 16,942
A Theory of Justice: Original Edition
Rawls, J. (1971) · doi:10.4159/9780674042605 · Cited by 9,496 · see citing works
Simon, H. A. (1991) · The Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.5.2.25 · Cited by 1,229 · see citing works
The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy
Rodrik, D. (2011) · ASEAN ECONOMIC BULLETIN · doi:10.1355/ae28-3k · Cited by 1,082 · see citing works
If You're an Egalitarian, How Come You’re So Rich?
Cohen, G. A. (2001) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/9780674029668 · Cited by 1,059 · see citing works
Companies Should Maximize Shareholder Welfare Not Market Value
Hart, O., & Zingales, L. (2017) · doi:10.67929/ecgi-fin-521-2017 · Cited by 666
Zucman, G., Fagan, T. L., & Piketty, T. (2015) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226245560.001.0001 · Cited by 523 · see citing works
The Value of Everything. Making and Taking in the Global Economy (an excerpt)
Mazzucato, M. (2018) · Journal of Economic Sociology · doi:10.17323/1726-3247-2020-5-39-57 · Cited by 356
The Fable of the Bees. Part I: or, Private Vices, Publick Benefits
Mandeville, B. (1714) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oseo/instance.00062041 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
The hidden wealth of nations: the scourge of tax havens
(2016) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.194788 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Simon, H. A. (1990) · Mathematical Social Sciences · doi:10.1016/0165-4896(90)90013-w · Cited by 135
A Manifesto for Social Progress: Ideas for a Better Society
Fleurbaey, M., Bouin, O., Salles-Djelic, M.-L., Kanbur, R., Nowotny, H., Reis, E., & Sen, A. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781108344128 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Self-citationDow, G. K. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316459423 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Alvarez Sainz, M., & Apellaniz, K. X. (2017) · BOGA: Basque Studies Consortium Journal · doi:10.18122/boga/vol5/iss1/1/boisestate
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Why Capital (Usually) Hires Labor: An Assessment of Proposed Explanations https://ssrn.com/abstract=10277 Dow G.K., Putterman L. (1996), Simon Fraser University - .
- The Great Escape. Health, Wealth, and the Origins of Inequality Deaton A. (2013), Princeton, Princeton University Press.
- Capitalism and Freedom Friedman M. (1962), Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
- Global Solutions Journal Kelly C. (2019), Repurposing our economies - and our businesses, vol.4, n°3/19, p.33-58.
- Capital in the 21 Century st Piketty T. (2014), Harvard, Harvard University Press.
- An Inquiry into the Nature and Courses of the Wealth of Nations Smith A. (1776), 1901 edition, London, Edwin A. Seligman.
- Prosperity Mayer C. (2018), Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Cited by
Still being checked.
- Authors
- Fleurbaey, M., & Minnaar, J.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Venue
- RIMHE : Revue Interdisciplinaire Management, Homme & Entreprise
- Publisher
- CAIRN
- Published
- 2021-04-09
- Volume
- n° 42, vol. 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 69-82
- ISSN
- 2259-2490 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3152741140
- Semantic Scholar
- f44e3603f4b6f9ef9033cc8335cf23746621f345
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- RIMHE Revue Interdisciplinaire Management Homme(s) & Entreprise (publishedVersion)
- Cairn.info (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Keywords
- Milton Friedman, corporate social responsibility, profit maximization, stakeholder theory, Business Roundtable, limited liability, externalities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-27.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-27.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review