Cited by 272Social and Intergroup PsychologyUrban, Neighborhood, and Segregation StudiesElectoral Systems and Political Participation

The Space between Us: Social Geography and Politics

Enos, Ryan D.·2017·Cambridge University Press eBooks

Abstract

The Space Between Us brings the connection between geography, psychology, and politics to life. By going into the neighborhoods of real cities, Enos shows how our perceptions of racial, ethnic, and religious groups are intuitively shaped by where these groups live and interact daily. Through the lens of numerous examples across the globe and drawing on a compelling combination of research techniques including field and laboratory experiments, big data analysis, and small-scale interactions, this timely book provides a new understanding of how geography shapes politics and how members of groups think about each other. Enos' analysis is punctuated with personal accounts from the field. His rigorous research unfolds in accessible writing that will appeal to specialists and non-specialists alike, illuminating the profound effects of social geography on how we relate to, think about, and politically interact across groups in the fabric of our daily lives.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/9781108354943

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Status threat stemming from local racial demographic change can provoke institutional backlash against the democratic inclusion of Black and Latino Americans or of recent immigrants.

    “Status threat stemming from local racial demographic change can provoke institutional backlash against the democratic inclusion of Black and Latino Americans or of recent immigrants (e.g., Bobo and Hutchings 1996; Enos 2017).”

    From Laboratories of Democratic Backsliding (2023) · cites this paper as Enos 2017

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Enos, R. D.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Enos, Ryan D.
Venue
Cambridge University Press eBooks
Published
2017-10-02
OpenAlex
W4256002387
Cited by
272
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
23.19
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Keywords
social geography, race perception, ethnic groups, religious groups, intergroup relations, spatial segregation, neighborhood effects, political attitudes, group identity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review