The DOI matches its Crossref record; 377 of the 377 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Register, Genre, and Style
Abstract
A fully updated and expanded second edition of this flagship work, which introduces methodological techniques to carry out analyses of text varieties, and provides descriptions of the most important text varieties in English. Part I introduces an analytical framework for studying registers, genre conventions, and styles, while Part II provides more detailed corpus-based descriptions of text varieties in English, including spoken interpersonal varieties, general and professional written varieties and emerging electronic varieties. Part III introduces more advanced analytical approaches and deals with larger theoretical concerns, such as the relationship between register studies and other sub-disciplines of linguistics, and practical applications of register analysis. A new chapter on EAP and ESP has been added, with new sections on the important differences between academic writing in the humanities and sciences, and a case study on engineering reports as an ESP register and genre. Coverage of new electronic registers has been updated, and a new analysis of hybrid registers has been added.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English
Broussard, K. M., Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (2000) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587792 · Cited by 8,193
Self-citationLaboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts
Latour, B. (1986) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 7,491
Language as social semiotic : the social interpretation of language and meaning
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978) · Cited by 5,776
Variation across Speech and Writing
Biber, D. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511621024 · Cited by 5,227
Self-citationGenre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings
Pufahl, I., & Swales, J. M. (1993) · Language · doi:10.2307/416471 · Cited by 5,111
Talking science: language, learning, and values
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-5211 · Cited by 3,996
Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach
Kauffman, L. E., & Hymes, D. (1976) · Anthropological Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3316843 · Cited by 3,195
Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication
Bosco, J., Gumperz, J. J., & Hymes, D. (1973) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3585682 · Cited by 2,968
Language style as audience design
Bell, A. (1984) · Language in Society · doi:10.1017/s004740450001037x · Cited by 2,904
Romaine, S. (2000) · Language in Society · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198731924.003.0003 · Cited by 2,685
Cited by
Dense and Disconnected: Analyzing the Sedimented Style of ChatGPT-Generated Text at Scale
Markey, B., Brown, D. W., Laudenbach, M., & Kohler, A. (2024) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/07410883241263528 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Biber, D., & Conrad, S.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2019-05-08
- OpenAlex
- W3127589626
- Cited by
- 623
- References
- 377
- FWCI
- 148.36
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Register, Genre, and Style. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/9781108686136
- The paper
- Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2019). Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108686136
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.