Bilingual Grammar: Toward an Integrated Model
Abstract
Does a bilingual person have two separate lexicons and two separate grammatical systems? Or should the bilingual linguistic competence be regarded as an integrated system? This book explores this issue, which is central to current debate in the study of bilingualism, and argues for an integrated hypothesis: the linguistic competence of an individual is a single cognitive faculty, and the bilingual mind should not be regarded as fundamentally different from the monolingual one. This conclusion is backed up with a variety of empirical data, in particular code-switching, drawn from a variety of bilingual pairs. The book introduces key notions in minimalism and distributed morphology, making them accessible to readers with different scholarly foci. This book is of interest to those working in linguistics and psycholinguistics, especially bilingualism, code-switching, and the lexicon.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Code-switching is rule-governed and not a linguistic crutch; grammatical code-switching requires proficiency in both languages.
“However, many studies show that code-switching is the opposite of these erroneous perceptions.In her seminal paper, Poplack (1980) provided evidence that codeswitching was rule-governed.Since then, the study of code-switching has flourished as researchers try to understand the syntactic rules of code-switching (López, 2020;Hoot & Ebert, 2021;among others).These studies have provided evidence that”
From Sounds Like Politics: Cardi B and the Discourse of Español Ratatá (2026) · cites this paper as López, 2020
Cites
Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E. (1994) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1994.1008 · Cited by 2,656 · see citing works
Structural priming: A critical review.
Pickering, M. J., & Ferreira, V. S. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.427 · Cited by 1,047 · see citing works
Brain potentials reveal unconscious translation during foreign language comprehension
Thierry, G., & Wu, Y. J. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0609927104 · Cited by 728 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sounds Like Politics: Cardi B and the Discourse of Español Ratatá
Delgado, R., Mora-Moreno, S., & Cervantes-Gómez, X. V. (2026) · Latino Studies · doi:10.1057/s41276-026-00579-w
- Authors
- López, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- Corresponding author
- López, Luis
- ORCID
- López, Luis
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2020-04-30
- OpenAlex
- W4211241391
- Cited by
- 147
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 47
- FWCI
- 19.64
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Keywords
- bilingualism, bilingual lexicons, code-switching, language skills, monolingualism, minimalism, Distributed Morphology, psycholinguistics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review