The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy, and Political Science
Abstract
In this book, John Dryzek criticizes the dominance of instrumental rationality and objectivism in political institutions and public policy and in the practice of political science. He argues that the reliance on these kinds of politics and to technocracies of expert cultures that are not only repressive, but surprisingly ill-equipped for dealing with complex social problems. Drawing on critical theory, he outlines an alternative program for the organization of political institutions advocating a form of communicatively rational democracy, which he terms discursive democracy, that stresses the importance of active citizenship and public discourse. He draws out the limitations of instrumental rationality and investigates how policy analysis and political science may be reformed to help constitute and comprehend democracy. Discursive Democracy examines how the political process can be made more vital and meaningful. At the same time it shows how such an invigorated process will serve as a more effective agent for social problem solving.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Stirling, A. (2008) · Science, Technology, & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243907311265 · Cited by 1,567
Blake, J. (1999) · Local Environment · doi:10.1080/13549839908725599 · Cited by 1,289
The Effects of E‐Government on Trust and Confidence in Government
Tolbert, C. J., & Mossberger, K. (2006) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00594.x · Cited by 1,092
HTUN, M., & WELDON, S. L. (2012) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055412000226 · Cited by 652
Hisschemöller, M., & Hoppe, R. (1995) · Knowledge and Policy · doi:10.1007/bf02832229 · Cited by 344
Panacea or diagnosis? Imaginaries of innovation and the ‘MIT model’ in three political cultures
Pfotenhauer, S., & Jasanoff, S. (2017) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312717706110 · Cited by 211
Health inequalities, fundamental causes and power: towards the practice of good theory
McCartney, G., Dickie, E., Escobar, O., & Collins, C. (2021) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/1467-9566.13181 · Cited by 110
Narrative policy analysis and the integration of public involvement in decision making
Hampton, G. (2009) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11077-009-9087-1 · Cited by 104
Environmentally significant behavior in the home
Stern, P. C. (2008) · The Cambridge Handbook of Psychology and Economic Behaviour · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511490118.015 · Cited by 50
Deliberative Democratic Practices in Canada: An Analysis of Institutional Empowerment in Three Cases
Johnson, G. F. (2009) · Canadian Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0008423909990072 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Dryzek, J. S.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1990-10-26
- OpenAlex
- W4248749752
- Cited by
- 1,181
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 47.16
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.