Cited by 113Health disparities and outcomesPublic Health and Social InequalitiesGender, Health, and Social Inequality

Health inequalities, fundamental causes and power: towards the practice of good theory

Open access
McCartney, Gerry, Dickie, Elinor, Escobar, Oliver, Collins, Chik·2021·Sociology of Health & Illness

Abstract

Reducing health inequalities remains a challenge for policy makers across the world. Beginning from Lewin’s famous dictum that “there is nothing as practical as a good theory”, this paper begins from an appreciative discussion of ‘fundamental cause theory’, emphasizing the elegance of its theoretical encapsulation of the challenge, the relevance of its critical focus for action, and its potential to support the practical mobilisation of knowledge in generating change. Moreover, it is argued that recent developments in the theory, provide an opportunity for further theoretical development focused more clearly on the concept of power (Dickie et al. 2015). A critical focus on power as the essential element in maintaining, increasing or reducing social and economic inequalities – including health inequalities – can both enhance the coherence of the theory, and also enhance the capacity to challenge the roots of health inequalities at different levels and scales. This paper provides an initial contribution by proposing a framework to help to identify the most important sources, forms and positions of power, as well as the social spaces in which they operate. Subsequent work could usefully test, elaborate and adapt this framework, or indeed ultimately replace it with something better, to help focus actions to reduce inequalities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-9566.13181

Cites

107 of 107 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 108 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Beeston, C., McCartney, G., Ford, J., Wimbush, E., et al (2013) Health inequalities policy review for the scottish ministerial task force on health inequalities. Edinburgh: NHS Health Scotland.
  2. Cornwall, A. and Coelho, V.S. (2007) Spaces for change? The politics of participation in new democratic arenas. London: Zed books, pp. 1– 29.
  3. Habermas, J. (1975) Legitimation crisis front cover Habermas beacon press, 1975. Boston: Beacon Press.
  4. Lukes, S. (2005) Power: A radical view. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCartney, G., Dickie, E., Escobar, O., & Collins, C.
Affiliations
  • Public Health Scotland (GB)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • University of the Faroe Islands (FO)
Corresponding author
McCartney, Gerry
Venue
Sociology of Health & Illness
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-11-22
Volume
43
Issue
1
Pages
20-39
ISSN
  • 0141-9889 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9566
OpenAlex
W3107066117
Cited by
110
References
108
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
FWCI
6.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sociology of Health & Illness (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/M003922/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
Keywords
health disparities, fundamental cause theory, power, social determinants of health, social inequality, economic inequality, health policy, knowledge mobilization
MeSH terms
Humans, Socioeconomic Factors, Health Status Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review