Cited by 29Colonialism, slavery, and tradeColonial History and Postcolonial StudiesLegal and cultural studies analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; none of the 52 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Advancing Empire: English Interests and Overseas Expansion, 1613-1688

Open access
Roper, L. H.·2017·Cambridge University Press eBooks

Abstract

In Advancing Empire, L. H. Roper explores the origins and early development of English overseas expansion. Roper focuses on the networks of aristocrats, merchants, and colonial-imperialists who worked to control the transport and production of exotic commodities, such as tobacco and sugar, as well as the labor required to produce them. He is primarily interested in the relationship between the English state and the people it governed, the role of that state in imperial development, the socio-political character of English colonies and English relations with Asians, Africans, American Indians, and other Europeans overseas. The activities stimulated the expansion and integration of global territorial and commercial interests that became the British Empire in the eighteenth century. In exploring these activities from a wider perspective, Roper offers a novel conclusion that revises popular analyses of the English Empire and of Anglo-America.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This chapter argues that Maurice Thompson and a Calvinist merchant network were central to seventeenth-century English overseas expansion, linking trade, colonization, and slave labor. It traces how their ventures, often failures, shaped Anglo-American plantation societies and the English Empire between 1613 and 1688.

Key findings

  • Maurice Thompson and associates such as Thomas Andrews, Samuel Moyer, William Pennoyer, Rowland Wilson, and John Wood shared ardently Calvinist views, played central roles in the rebellion against Charles I, and became deeply involved in government between 1642 and 1660. Thompson shipped “about sixty slaves” to St. Christopher’s in 1626, described as the first recorded English slaving voyage to an English settlement.
  • The Sandys-Ferrar directorate of the Virginia Company introduced headrights, a House of Burgesses, and indentured servitude in 1618; the “tobacco boom” of 1618–22 followed. The Powhatan attack on Easter 1622 killed over one-quarter of the settlers, and the Crown dissolved the Virginia Company in June 1624.
  • African slavery preceded indentured servitude in Anglo-America: the first recorded mention of Africans at Virginia was in 1619/20, when a Dutch privateer brought “20.and odd Negroes,” but enslaved Africans were cultivating tobacco in Bermuda by 1616 and constituted 5 to 10 percent of that colony’s population by 1619. Henry Winthrop reported that 40 of Barbados’s 100 inhabitants were enslaved directly after the colony’s founding.
  • Sir William Courteen’s global vision included Essequibo settlements producing a reported 800,000 pounds of tobacco per annum by 1623 and upward of £10,000 invested in Barbados; the Crown reportedly owed him £200,000 by the 1630s. Maurice Thompson and partners inherited and revamped Courteen’s plan, but their Assada Adventure failed amid indigenous resistance and restored monarchy interests in the Guinea trade in the early 1660s.

Methods

  • Historical monograph chapter analyzing English overseas expansion from 1613 to 1688 through the careers, networks, and patronage ties of Maurice Thompson and his associates.
  • Draws on archival and printed sources including court cases, depositions, wills, company records, state papers, correspondence, and promotional pamphlets.
  • Main analysis is narrative and network-based, connecting religion, politics, trade, colonization, and labor while emphasizing failure as a primary result of English imperial activity.

Limitations

  • Stated: the “sketchy historical record” limits understanding; ledgers and business records do not survive in significant numbers; precise population figures are impossible to recover with precision and methodology has drawn serious concerns; political heat around the tobacco boom requires wariness about claims; the author notes “we lack direct evidence” about colonizers’ thinking on indenture and “we do not know whose idea it was” to bring Venezuelan tobacco to Jamestown.
  • Evident: the chapter centers elite male merchants, patrons, and officials; servants, enslaved Africans, and Indigenous peoples appear mainly through English records, so their perspectives and agency are not fully recoverable from this text.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/9781316340493

Cites

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

52 Sources not found · 36 No basis given · 21 Own interpretation · 1 Not checked yet

Show all 49 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 44
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 24
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 4
61 of 61
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Plantations required bound labor to succeed.

    “As these colonizers knew well, plantations required bound labor to succeed.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Indentured servitude never brought migrants in sufficient numbers to meet colonial labor requirements.

    “Indentured servitude certainly offered one feasible means of addressing this issue, yet it never brought migrants in sufficient numbers.”
2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 29

Metadata

Authors
Roper, L. H.
Affiliations
SUNY New Paltz (US)
Corresponding author
Roper, L. H.
Venue
Cambridge University Press eBooks
Published
2017-07-03
OpenAlex
W4240254012
Cited by
29
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 20 · 2018: 2
FWCI
12.09
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Colonialism, slavery, and trade
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Colonial History and Postcolonial Studies
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Legal and cultural studies analysis
Keywords
British Empire, English overseas expansion, colonialism, tobacco, sugar, colonial labor, English colonies, Anglo-American relations, 18th century, international trade, imperial networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Advancing Empire: English Interests and Overseas Expansion, 1613-1688. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/9781316340493
The paper
Roper, L. H. (2017). Advancing Empire: English Interests and Overseas Expansion, 1613-1688. Cambridge University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316340493