The DOI matches its Crossref record; 237 of the 238 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 27 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Birthright Citizens: A History of Race and Rights in Antebellum America
Open accessAbstract
Before the Civil War, colonization schemes and black laws threatened to deport former slaves born in the United States. Birthright Citizens recovers the story of how African American activists remade national belonging through battles in legislatures, conventions, and courthouses. They faced formidable opposition, most notoriously from the US Supreme Court decision in Dred Scott. Still, Martha S. Jones explains, no single case defined their status. Former slaves studied law, secured allies, and conducted themselves like citizens, establishing their status through local, everyday claims. All along they argued that birth guaranteed their rights. With fresh archival sources and an ambitious reframing of constitutional law-making before the Civil War, Jones shows how the Fourteenth Amendment constitutionalized the birthright principle, and black Americans' aspirations were realized. Birthright Citizens tells how African American activists radically transformed the terms of citizenship for all Americans.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Martha S. Jones argues that antebellum free African Americans, especially in Baltimore, developed and pressed claims to birthright citizenship through a vernacular legal culture of courthouse appearances, conventions, and newspapers, ideas that anticipated the Fourteenth Amendment. The book is built around William Yates's 1838 treatise *Rights of Colored Men* and the author's discovery that two different men named William Yates stood behind the era's black rights activism.
Key findings
- Free people of color claimed an "unassailable belonging" grounded in birthright citizenship; no legal text expressly provided for it, but their ideas anticipated the Fourteenth Amendment, which along with the Civil Rights Act of 1866 affirmed that the US-born were citizens independent of "race, color, or previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude."
- Rights were secured through performance: "rights holders were those who did what rights holders did." Black Baltimoreans traveled between states, gathered in religious assemblies, sued and were sued, testified, and secured persons and property — "the rights they inhabited became the rights they held."
- Yates's treatise held that citizenship is distinct from political rights and "strikes deeper" than the vote; it rested on four principles, including that free people of color were citizens under Article 4, section 2, clause 1 and entitled to its "privileges and immunities," and that denial of the vote did not make one a noncitizen.
- After *Scott v. Sandford* (1857), "nothing changed in Baltimore": residents continued to exercise rights, Maryland's high court declined to adopt Dred Scott's reasoning and affirmed free people of color's right to protect persons and property, and a legislative push for reenslavement or expulsion failed after black Baltimoreans lobbied against it.
- Baltimore was the nation's third largest city and home to the nation's largest free black community, "some 25,000 residents"; on the eve of the Civil War nearly half a million people, mostly US-born, lived with rights subject to political whim.
- The author resolves a historiographic confusion: Charles Wesley treated Yates as a pioneering black historian, John Myers assumed he was white — Myers was correct. The treatise writer was a white antislavery agent; a second William Yates, born a slave in Virginia, purchased his freedom, worked as a porter at the Supreme Court, moved to San Francisco, and wrote for the *Elevator* under the pen name "Amigo."
Methods
- A history of race and rights told "through a series of disruptive vignettes," linking ordinary black litigants to better-remembered lawyers, judges, and legislators; the author frames rights as a process by which black Americans "imagined, claimed, and enacted their relationship to law," drawing on Bonnie Honig's account of outsider rights claims.
- Sources are "shardlike courthouse records — dockets, minute books, and case files" from Baltimore, read alongside newspapers, political conventions, and legislative and high-court debates; the study is grounded in a local legal culture framed by jurisdiction.
- Structure: chapters 1–4 trace legal consciousness among black Baltimoreans; chapters 5–7 examine their turn to the local courthouse (church property disputes, black laws, insolvency, apprenticeship and habeas corpus); chapter 8 treats the era of *Scott v. Sandford*; the conclusion looks at early Reconstruction.
Limitations
- Stated by the author: grounding the book in the perspective of black activists gives it "a selective and sometimes partial view of the era's citizenship debate"; *Corfield v. Coryell* (1823), later deemed influential, is "outside the scope of this book" because there is no evidence it influenced thinking about free African Americans in Baltimore.
- Stated by the author: this is "not... a story of unbridled agency in a triumphalist sense" — inhabiting rights and comporting oneself like a citizen "only sometimes secured justice," and "just as often, just ends remained elusive."
- Evident from the text: the excerpt is the book's introduction, so the evidentiary detail behind its claims (individual case files, chapter-level findings) is not shown here; the author also notes that the antebellum equation linking rights and citizenship "was never fixed," and that courts, commentators, and treatise writers disagreed and changed their minds, leaving no settled answer to whether black Americans were citizens.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
27 Sources not found · 21 No basis given · 16 Own interpretation · 4 Own result · 1 Not checked yet
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Yates led a mid-1850s challenge against a state law that barred black testimony against the interests of white people.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“They too were students of law, though of a less orthodox sort, gleaning ideas from the world around them.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [52]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“He had a legal education, the kind acquired through the negotiations that secured his liberty and through observing the goings-on in the nation's high court.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“His labors earned him enough to secure the manumission of his wife, Emeliner, and their three children.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [45]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“William Yates the reviewer for the Elevator was born a slave”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“It was 1838 when Rights of Colored Men to Suffrage, Citizenship, and Trial by Jury was published in Philadelphia.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [2]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Yates authored the very fi rst legal treatise on the rights of free black Americans.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [1]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Whether for or against designating them as citizens, there was widespread agreement about the need to situate former slaves in the nation's legal regime.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The evidence gleaned from early American Anti-Slavery Society reports supports Myers's conclusion that Yates was a white abolitionist, a memorable one for his having worked with black people in the North.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [33]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“He built his arguments on the published opinions of judges, legislators, and constitutional framers who also advocated that free black Americans had rights.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 26
- It may state two separate claims as one. 20
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Some say he read law for a time, although there is no evidence he was admitted to the bar.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Faced with uncertainty, some fl ed for Northern cities, Liberia, or Canada.Many more stayed put.”
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Still, there is no evidence that Corfi eld infl uenced the thinking about free African Americans in Baltimore or elsewhere.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Commentators and treatise writers were never in accord and amended their writings to refl ect changed thinking.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“His discussion of citizenship was original, a structured synthesis that brought together a close reading of the Constitution with congressional debates and learned commentary.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“His institutional home had been the American Anti-Slavery Society, in which black men were marginalized in the 1830s.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Rights of Colored Men received prominent notices in the black and abolitionist press and could be purchased at local antislavery society offi ces.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [10]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There had been two men named William Yates.The Yates who penned the Elevator review and the one who authored Rights of Colored Men were not one and the same.”
plainn = 2- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“They developed legal consciousness -an understanding of their lives through law -and sought badges of citizenship.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [55]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Sometimes citizenship was defi ned in constitutions and statutes, although most of the time it was not.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Charles Wesley was the fi rst historian to recover Yates.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“He was not one of antebellum America's highly regarded legal minds.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Myers did not directly address the matter of Yates's racial identity, and assumed that he had been a white man who worked closely with black Americans.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [31]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Free black activists were generally of one mind.But even if they agreed that they were citizens, they did not agree about whether the state might affi rm that fact.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“From Virginia, Yates purchased his freedom”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Courts disagreed and even changed their minds over who was a citizen and what rights might attach to that status.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For some, being a citizen was the gateway to rights.Citizenship was a prerequisite to the right to vote.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“migrated to Washington, DC, and began working as a porter at the United States Supreme Court.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [44]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For others, exercising rights was evidence of citizenship.If a person exercised the right to vote, it was evidence that he was a citizen.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Yates had moved to San Francisco, where he became a public fi gure.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [46]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In1865 he headed the black state convention's committee on voting rights.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“This view defers to the opinion of Chief Justice Roger Taney, who held that no African American, enslaved or free, was a citizen of the United States.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [50]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainSingle case- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The result is a history, told through a series of disruptive vignettes, that suggests how people without rights still exercised them.”
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most powerful was Yates's argument about how law, though suffering from amnesia, could be made right.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No legal text expressly provided for such, but their ideas anticipated the terms of the Fourteenth Amendment.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Yates provides a window onto the position that some activists -black and white -took on race and citizenship at the end of the 1830s.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Other studies have examined African American rights during the antebellum period, although few have expressly linked rights to citizenship as this book does.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [60]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Men like San Francisco's William Yates wrote for newspapers, engaged in the vernacular study of law, debated in political conventions, and conducted themselves like rights-bearing individuals, all the while pressing for a radical redefi nition of citizenship.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Quotidian courthouse appearances resonate with debates in legislatures, high courts, and political conventions.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Yates's text fueled understandings of the role that law might play in claims for free black rights.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“But Yates's text was also a work of advocacy.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [10]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The discovery of a second William Yates is more than coincidence.It is an affi rmation of the very premise of this book.Black Americans can serve as our guides through a history of race and rights.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Inhabiting rights and comporting themselves like citizens only sometimes secured justice.”
- Also stated in: § Rights of Colored Men: Debating Citizenship in Antebellum America · plain
“Just as often, just ends remained elusive.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [57]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Rights of Colored Men: Debating Citizenship in Antebellum America · plain
In the paper
“When examining high court decisions, historians have relied on the 1857 case of Scott v. Sandford to explain the legal status of black Americans.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [50]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirectn = 1,857- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Legal culture was also capable of reform, of itself and of the status of black Americans.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This view credits federal offi cials and Congress members with having devised and set in place the principle of jus soli in American law.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [51]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“To the degree the concept was relevant, it guaranteed few rights or privileges, with neither voting rights nor property ownership, for example, dependent on citizenship.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [49]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Still others have looked for the origins of African American citizenship in the era of Reconstruction, with the ratifi cation of the Fourteenth Amendment's birthright citizenship provision.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [51]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“His bona fi des on the subject of race and citizenship were best established during his years as an agent for the American Anti-Slavery Society.”
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Citations
Cites
Cities of the dead: circum-Atlantic performance
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-1318 · Cited by 1,786
The alchemy of race and rights
Munster, A. (1992) · Journal of Criminal Justice · doi:10.1016/0047-2352(92)90026-6 · Cited by 1,280
The Right to Stay Put, Revisited: Gentrification and Resistance to Displacement in New York City
Newman, K., & Wyly, E. K. (2006) · Urban Studies · doi:10.1080/00420980500388710 · Cited by 834
Honig, B. (2001) · doi:10.1515/9781400824816 · Cited by 704
Racecraft: The Soul of Inequality in American Life
Lukes, S. (2014) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.1177/0094306114531284q · Cited by 630
Citizenship and Social Class, and Other Essays.
Cole, G. D. H., & Marshall, T. H. (1951) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2226966 · Cited by 624
Kramer, L. (2004) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195169188.001.0001 · Cited by 433
Slaves without Masters: The Free Negro in the Antebellum South
Rudwick, E. M., & Berlin, I. (1976) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/1852604 · Cited by 410
Serving Two Masters: Integration Ideals and Client Interests in School Desegregation Litigation
Bell, D. A. (1976) · The Yale Law Journal · doi:10.2307/795339 · Cited by 405
Johnson, W. (2003) · Journal of Social History · doi:10.1353/jsh.2003.0143 · Cited by 405
Research works printed but not linked: 142
- Yamin, 2002, Tales of Five Points: Working-Class Life in Nineteenth-Century New York
- Wright, 1921, The Free Negro in Maryland, 1632–1860
- Whitman, 1999, The Price of Freedom: Slavery and Freedom in Baltimore and Early National Maryland
- 1916, A Typical Colonization Convention, Journal of Negro History, 1
- Thomas, 1976, Public Education and Black Protest in Baltimore, 1865–1900, Maryland Historical Magazine, 73
- Sullivan, 1973, William Lloyd Garrison in Baltimore, 1829–1830, Maryland Historical Magazine, 68, 64
- Reser, 1998, Comment: Airline Terrorism: The Effect of Tightened Security on the Right to Travel, Journal of Air Law and Commerce, 63
- Quarles, 1987, Charles Harris Wesley, Proceedings of the American Antiquarian Society, 97
- Phillips, 1988, Maryland and the Caribbean, 1634–1984: Some Highlights, Maryland Historical Magazine, 83, 199
- 10.4159/9780674089174 · DOI
- 2002, The Transformation of American Abolitionism: Fighting Slavery in the Early Republic
- Melton, 2005, African American Methodism in the M.E. Tradition: The Case of Sharp Street (Baltimore), North Star: A Journal of African American Religious History, 8
- Meeker, 2011, Curtis W. Jacobs’ Diary and Account Book, 1854–1866, Maryland Historical Magazine, 106
- Levy, 1994, The Establishment Clause: Religion and the First Amendment
- Katz, 1974, Resistance at Christiana: A Documentary Account
- 2013, River of Dark Dreams: Slavery and Empire in the Cotton Kingdom.
- 1985, Pigs and Positivism, Wisconsin Law Review, 4, 899
- Provine, 1996, District of Columbia Free Negro Registers, 1821–1861
- 2009, The Political Worlds of Slavery and Freedom
- George, 1973, Segregated Sabbaths: Richard Allen and the Rise of Independent Black Churches: 1760–1840
- Schneider, 2009, A Guide to the Clarence M. Mitchell, Jr. Courthouse, Baltimore, Maryland
- Gardner, 1976, Ante-bellum Black Education in Baltimore, Maryland Historical Magazine, 71
- Fuke, 1971, The Baltimore Association for the Moral and Educational Improvement of the Colored People, 1864–1870, Maryland Historical Magazine, 66, 369
- Floyd, 2014, Union-Occupied Maryland: A Civil War Chronicle of Civilians and Soldiers
- 2002, Slavery and the Law
- Elfenbein, 2002, From Mobtown to Charm City: New Perspectives on Baltimore’s Past
- Della, 1973, An Analysis of Baltimore’s Population in the 1850s., Maryland Historical Magazine, 68, 20
- Cook, 2003, Dancing across the Color Line, Common-Place, 4
- Conkin, 1980, Prophets of Prosperity: America’s First Political Economists
- Brophy, 1998, A Revolution Which Seeks to Abolish Law, Must End Necessarily in Despotism’: Louisa McCord and Antebellum Southern Legal Thought, Cardozo Women’s Law Journal, 5, 33
- Brickner, 2003, The Passenger Cases (1849): Justice John McLean’s ‘Cherished Policy’ as the First of Three Phases of American Immigration Law, Southwestern Journal of Law and Trade in the Americas, 10, 63
- Beasley, 1997, The Negro Trailblazers of California
- Banks, 2004, A Contradiction in Antebellum Baltimore: A Competitive School for Girls of ‘Color’ within a Slave State, Maryland Historical Magazine, 99
- Banks, 2009, Curtis Washington Jacobs: Architect of Absolute Black Enslavement, 1850–1864, Maryland Historical Magazine, 104
- Ball, 1993, The Word and the Law
- Kantrowitz, 2012, More Than Freedom: Citizenship in a White Republic, 1829–1889
- 10.5744/florida/9780813044378.001.0001 · DOI
- Alloy, 2002, 158-County Banishment Georgia: Constitutional Implications under the State Constitutional and the Federal Right to Travel, Georgia Law Review, 36
- 1987, Light for All: Arunah S. Abell and the Rise of the Baltimore ‘Sun.’, Maryland Historical Magazine, 82, 197
- Abel, 2002, Judicial Independence: If You Gag the Lawyers, Do You Choke the Courts? Some Implications for Judges When Funding Restrictions Curb Advocacy by Lawyers on Behalf of the Poor, Fordham Urban Law Journal, 29, 873
- Yates, 1838, Rights of Colored Men to Suffrage, Citizenship and Trial by Jury: Being a Book of Facts, Arguments and Authorities, Historical Notices and Sketches of Debates – With Notes
- Wright, 1916, Centennial of the African Methodist Church
- 1858, Woods’ Baltimore Directory, for 1858–59
- 1833, The Life and Character of Patrick Henry
- 1804, The Rainbow; First Series: Originally Published in the Richmond Enquirer
- Wirt, 1803, The Letters of a British Spy: Originally Published in the Virginia Argus, in August and September 1803
- Wattles, 1838, Memorial to the General Assembly of the State of Ohio
- Turnbull, 1840, Travels in the West: Cuba; with Notice of Porto Rico, and the Slave Trade
- Tiffany, 1849, A Treatise on the Unconstitutionality of American Slavery
- 1997, Freedom’s Port: The African American Community of Baltimore, 1790–1860
- 1832, Speeches of John Sergeant of Pennsylvania
- Semmes, 1917, John H. B. Latrobe and His Times, 1803–1891
- 1840, Report of Messrs. Peck and Price, Who Were Appointed at a Meeting of the Free Colored People of Baltimore, Held on the 25th November, 1839, Delegates to Visit British Guiana, and the Island of Trinidad
- 1851, Regulations, Circulars, Orders and Decisions, for the Guide of Officers of the Navy of the United States, Continued in Part and Issued since the Publication Authorized by the Navy Department in March, 1832
- 1837, Proceedings and Debates of the Convention of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, to Propose Amendments to the Constitution, Commenced and Held at Harrisburg, on the Second Day of May, 1837
- Pennington, 1841, Text Book of the Origin and History of the Colored People
- Pairpoint, 1857, Uncle Sam and His Country; or, Sketches of America, 1854–55–56
- Hall, 1852, Official Opinions of the Attorneys General of the United States, Advising the President and Heads of Departments in Relation to Their Official Duties
- Services of Colored Men, in the Wars of 1776 and 1812
- Nell, 1855, The Colored Patriots of the American Revolution, with Sketches of Several Distinguished Colored Persons: To Which Is Added a Brief 224Survey of the Condition and Prospects of Colored Americans
- 1835, Minutes of the Fifth Annual Convention for the Improvement of the Free People of Colour in the United States, Held by Adjournments, in the Wesley Church, Philadelphia
- 1833, Minutes and Proceedings of the Third Annual Convention, for the Improvement of the Free People of Color in these United States
- Williams, 1987, The Baltimore Sun, 1837–1987
- 1832, Minutes and Proceedings of the Second Annual Convention, for the Improvement of the Free People of Color in These United States
- 1831, Minutes and Proceedings of the First Annual Convention of the People of Colour, Held by Adjournments in the City of Philadelphia, from the Sixth to the Eleventh of June, Inclusive, 1831
- 1842, Matchett’s Baltimore Director, or Register of Householders
- Anderson, 1897, Landmarks of Rensselaer County, New York
- 1860, The Maryland Code: Public General Laws and Public Local Laws, 1860
- Legrand, 1861, Letter to Hon. Reverdy Johnson, on the Proceedings at the Meeting, Held at Maryland Institute, January 10th, 1861
- Latrobe, 1832, Picture of Baltimore, Containing a Description of All Objects of Interest in the City and Embellished with Views of the Principal Public Buildings
- Latrobe, 1826, The Justices’ Practice under the Laws of Maryland
- 1838, The Ordinances of the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
- Kent, 1826, Commentaries on American Law, in Four Volumes
- 1831, Journal of the Proceedings of the Senate of the State of Maryland
- Jay, 1853, Miscellaneous Writings on Slavery
- Handy, 1902, Scraps of African Methodist Episcopal History
- Goodell, 1844, Views of American Constitutional Law, in Its Bearing upon American Slavery
- Penningroth, 2003, The Claims of Kinfolk: Africa American Property and Community in the Nineteenth-Century South
- 1980, Proceedings of the Black State Conventions, 1840–1865
- 1817, The Doctrines and Discipline of the African Methodist Episcopal Church
- 1840, Digest of Patents, Issued by the United States, from 1790 to January 1, 1839
- 1851, Debates and Proceedings of the Maryland Reform Convention to Revise the State Constitution: To Which Are Prefixed the Bill of Rights and Constitution Adopted
- Browne, 1980, Baltimore in the Nation, 1789–1861
- Cowley, 1827, The Speeches of Henry Clay, Delivered in the Congress of the United States
- 1847, Constitution and Laws of Maryland in Liberia with an Appendix of Precedents: Published by Authority of the Maryland State Colonization Society
- Cobb, 1858, An Inquiry into the Law of Negro Slavery
- 1856, Catalogue of the New-York State Library: 1855
- 1855, Catalogue of the Library of the Massachusetts Historical Society
- Carter, 1821, Reports of the Proceedings and Debates of the Convention of 1821, Assembled for the Purpose of Amending the Constitution of the State of New York: Containing All the Official Documents, Relating to the Subject, and Other Valuable Matter
- Dorsey, 1840, The General Public Statutory Law and Public Local Law of the State of Maryland, from the Year 1692 to 1839 Inclusive: With Annotations Thereto, and a Copious Index
- Watkins, 1836, Address Delivered before the Moral Reform Society, in Philadelphia, August 8, 1836
- 1890, Notes on the Progress of the Colored People of Maryland since the War
- Schoeppner, 2009, Legitimating Quarantine: Moral Contagions, the Commerce Clause, and the Limits of Gibbons v. Ogden, Journal of Southern Legal History, 17, 81
- Nott, 1856, Slavery, and the Remedy, or, Principles and Suggestions for a Remedial Code
- 2015, Making Foreigners: Immigration and Citizenship Law in America, 1600–2000
- 1846, Index to the Law of Maryland: From the Year 1838 to the Year 1845, Inclusive
- 2000, Double Character: Slavery and Mastery in the Antebellum Southern Courtroom
- Mencken, 1899, A Monograph of the New Baltimore Court House: One of the Greatest Examples of American Architecture, and the Foremost Court House of the United States; Including an Historical Sketch of the Early Courts of Maryland
- Tyson, 1825, Life of Elisha Tyson, the Philanthropist
- Whittington, 1999, Constitutional Construction: Divided Power and Constitutional Meaning
- Looney, 1983, Biting the Budget at Legal Services, Southern Changes, 4
- 1997, Blacks, Whites, and Guns: Interracial Violence in Post-Emancipation Maryland, Maryland Historical Magazine, 92
- Melton, 2007, African American Maritime Pilots in the South Atlantic Shipping Trade, 1640–1865, Journal of the Georgia Association of Historians, 27, 1
- Wilson, 1902, Washington: The Capital City, and Its Part in the History of the Nation
- Mason, 1839, Journal of the Proceedings of the House of Delegates of the State of Maryland at a December Session Eighteen Hundred and Thirty Eight
- Beirne, 1988, The Impact of Black Labor on European Immigration into Baltimore’s Oldtown, 1790–1910, Maryland Historical Magazine, 83
- Koger, 1946, Negro Baptists of Maryland
- 1976, William Watkins: Antebellum Black Teacher and Writer, Negro History Bulletin, 39
- Scharf, 1881, History of Baltimore City and County
- Binney, 1853, The Alienigenae of the United States under the Present Naturalization Laws
- 1853, Proceedings of the National Convention held in Rochester on the 6th, 7th and 8th of July, 1853
- 2004, A Nation under Our Feet: Black Political Struggles in the Rural South from Slavery to the Great Migration
- Powell, 2001, Attorney General Taney and the South Carolina Police Bill, Green Bag, 5, 75
- Garrison, 1971, I Will Be Heard! 1822–1835
- Hancock, 1971, William Yates’ Letter of 1837: Slavery, and Colored People in Delaware, Delaware History, 14
- 1860, Testimony in the Case of Judge Stump, before a Joint Committee of the Legislature
- Sobel, 1988, Trabelin’ On: The Slave Journey to an Afro-Baptist Faith
- 1831, Resolutions of the People of Color, at a Meeting Held on the 25th of January, 1831
- Brodine, 2007, Interpreting Old Ironsides: An Illustrated Guide to USS Constitution
- Brown, 1993, Maryland’s First Political Convention by and for Its Colored People, Maryland Historical Magazine, 88, 297
- Porter, 1992, Comment: Toward a Constitutional Analysis of the Right to Intrastate Travel, Northwestern University Law Review, 86, 820
- Phillips, 1996, The Dear Name of Home: Resistance to Colonization in Antebellum Baltimore, Maryland Historical Magazine, 91, 180
- 1818, Rules, Regulations, and Instructions for the Naval Service of the United States
- Brent, 1852, Report of Attorney General Brent, to His Excellency, Gov. Lowe, in Relation to the Christiana Treason Trials, in the Circuit Court of the United States
- 1838, Report of the Third Anniversary of the Ohio Anti-Slavery Society, Held in Granville, Licking County, Ohio, on the 30th of May, 1838
- Nevin, 1884, Encyclopædia of the Presbyterian Church in the United States of America
- Lundy, 1836, The War in Texas
- Forbes, 1998, But We Have No Country: The 1851 Christiana, Pennsylvania, Resistance
- Penniman, 2004, Baltimore’s Daily Press and Slavery, 1857–1860, Maryland Historical Magazine, 99, 491
- 1901, The Bench and Bar of Maryland: A History, 1634–1901
- Stopak, 1968, The Maryland State Colonization Society: Independent State Action in the Colonization Movement, Maryland Historical Magazine, 63
- Davidson, 2008, The Lawyer’s Perspective: Celebrating the Courthouse, The Green Bag: An Entertaining Journal of Law, 11
- Bragg, 1914, Men of Maryland
- Pratt, 2009, A History of the Book in America
- Story, 1833, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States . . . in Three Volumes
- Bates, 1863, Opinion of Attorney General Bates on Citizenship
- Mercier, 1841, Life in a Man-of-War, or Scenes in “Old Ironsides” during Her Cruise in the Pacific, by a Fore-Top-Man
- 1822, The Baltimore Directory of 1822 and 1823
- 1816, Minutes of the Proceedings of the Fourteenth American Convention for Promoting the Abolition of Slavery, and Improving the Condition of the African Race, assembled at Philadelphia
- Adams, 1885, History of Baptist Churches in Maryland Connected with the Maryland Baptist Union Association
- 1871, Baltimore: Past and Present, with Biographical Sketches of Its Representative Men
- Bergman, 1969, The Negro in the Congressional Record, 1789–1801
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 271
The Revival of “Colonization,” to 1861
Page, S. N. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316493915.002
“A purer form of government”: African American constitutionalism in the founding of Liberia
Cash, J. T. (2021) · Journal of Transatlantic Studies · doi:10.1057/s42738-021-00081-2
Martial Law, the Privy Council and the Zulu Rebellion of 1906
Lobban, M. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009004848.010
22. THE LONG EMANCIPATION REVISITED
Walcott, R. (2021) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478021360-022
7. THE ATLANTIC REGION AND 1492
Walcott, R. (2021) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478021360-007
Walcott, R. (2021) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478021360-021
18. TOWARD A SAGGIN’ PANTS ETHICS
Walcott, R. (2021) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478021360-018
“Many-Coloured Scenes of Life”
Auerbach, S. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108863711.002
Walcott, R. (2021) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478021360-008
Auerbach, S. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108863711.003
Walcott, R. (2021) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478021360-005
Walcott, R. (2021) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478021360-011
Walcott, R. (2021) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478021360-014
Morales, E. P. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108917513.009
Walcott, R. (2021) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478021360-003
Walcott, R. (2021) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478021360-017
Walcott, R. (2021) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478021360-020
13. PROBLEM OF THE HUMAN, OR THE VOID OF RELATIONALITY
Walcott, R. (2021) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478021360-013
Auerbach, S. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108863711.001
Walcott, R. (2021) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478021360-009
Walcott, R. (2021) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478021360-004
10. CATASTROPHE, WAKE, HAUNTOLOGY
Walcott, R. (2021) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478021360-010
Walcott, R. (2021) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478021360-002
Auerbach, S. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108863711.010
1. MOVING TOWARD BLACK FREEDOM
Walcott, R. (2021) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478021360-001
Walcott, R. (2021) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478021360-015
19. BLACK MEN, STYLE, AND FASHION
Walcott, R. (2021) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478021360-019
Auerbach, S. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108863711.008
Walcott, R. (2021) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478021360-006
12. SLAVE SHIP LOGICS/LOGISTICS
Walcott, R. (2021) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478021360-012
Martial Law in the Anglo-Boer War, 1899–1902
Lobban, M. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009004848.009
Ramdani, F. (2022) · Comparative American Studies An International Journal · doi:10.1080/14775700.2022.2031585
Detention without Trial in Sierra Leoneand the Gold Coast, 1865–1890
Lobban, M. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009004848.005
Lobban, M. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009004848.004
Consolidating Colonial Rule: Detentions in the Gold Coast and Sierra Leone, 1896–1901
Lobban, M. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009004848.007
Lobban, M. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009004848.001
Martial Law and the Rule of Law in the Eastern Cape, 1830–1880
Lobban, M. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009004848.002
Zulu Political Prisoners, 1872–1897
Lobban, M. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009004848.003
Detention Comes to Court: African Appeals to the Courts in Whitehall and Westminster, 1895–1922
Lobban, M. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009004848.008
A Short History of Local Citizenship
Stahl, K. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316661352.005
Minority Protections and Conditionality
Chang, F. B., & Rucker-Chang, S. T. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316663813.005
Race, Space, Place, and Urban Citizenship
Stahl, K. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316661352.011
Stahl, K. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316661352.002
Stahl, K. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316661352.001
Stahl, K. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316661352.015
Chang, F. B., & Rucker-Chang, S. T. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316663813.007
Local Citizenship for Nonresident Landowners
Stahl, K. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316661352.009
Local Citizenship for Noncitizen Residents
Stahl, K. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316661352.008
Chang, F. B., & Rucker-Chang, S. T. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316663813.008
A Return to Urban Citizenship?
Stahl, K. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316661352.012
Minority Protections and Internal Governance
Chang, F. B., & Rucker-Chang, S. T. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316663813.006
Schoeppner, M. A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695404.001 · Cited by 1
Stahl, K. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316661352.006
Auerbach, S. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108863711.009
Stahl, K. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316661352.014
Sacrificing Black Citizenship, 1848–1859
Schoeppner, M. A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695404.007
Schoeppner, M. A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695404.009
Schoeppner, M. A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695404.010
Historical Comparisons: From the Cold War to Eastern Enlargement
Chang, F. B., & Rucker-Chang, S. T. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316663813.003
Stahl, K. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316661352.017
Schoeppner, M. A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695404.011
Stahl, K. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316661352.016
Chang, F. B., & Rucker-Chang, S. T. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316663813.001
“Foreign” Emissaries and Rights Discourse, 1842–1847
Schoeppner, M. A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695404.006
Stahl, K. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316661352.013
Globalization and the Collapsing Distinction between Local and Federal Citizenship
Stahl, K. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316661352.010
Local Citizenship and Woman Suffrage
Stahl, K. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316661352.007
Stahl, K. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316661352.004
Chang, F. B., & Rucker-Chang, S. T. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316663813.004
(2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316663813.009
Rasmussen, A. B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108980135.007
Delgado, M. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190058463.003.0010
Chira, A. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/obo/9780199766581-0217
Lobban, M. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009004848.012
(2021) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478021360-023
(2019) · Law & Social Inquiry · doi:10.1017/lsi.2019.14
(2021) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478021360-024
(2021) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478021360-016
Chang, F. B., & Rucker-Chang, S. T. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316663813.010
Stahl, K. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316661352.018
de la Fuente, A., & Gross, A. J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108612951.009
Delgado, M. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190058463.003.0004
Forret, J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108651912.020
Hawthorne, C. (2022) · Cornell University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781501762307-013
Hawthorne, C. (2022) · Cornell University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781501762307-012
(2022) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478023128-009
Afro-Caribbean Panamanians and the Future of Diasporic World Making
(2022) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478023128-007
(2022) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478023128-002
Legacies of Exclusion and Afro-Caribbean Diasporic World Making
(2022) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478023128-001
Erman, S. C. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108233866.010
Erman, S. C. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108233866.009
(2022) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478023128-006
(2022) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478023128-005
(2022) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478023128-008
(2022) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478023128-003
(2022) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478023128-004
Minardi, M. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/obo/9780190280024-0111
Feldman, L. (2023) · Law and History Review · doi:10.1017/s0738248023000032
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, M. S.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jones, Martha S.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2018-06-25
- OpenAlex
- W4211237095
- Semantic Scholar
- e07ae6eb08088e55462821ec8b15f4fe090f79b0
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 238
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 41.14
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Colonialism, slavery, and trade
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › American Constitutional Law and Politics
- Keywords
- birthright citizenship, African American citizenship, freedmen, Dred Scott decision, Fourteenth Amendment, national belonging, African American activism, antebellum United States, civil rights
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review