Cited by 54Electoral Systems and Political ParticipationPolitical Theory and DemocracyPolitical Conflict and Governance

Party System Institutionalization, Predictability, and Democracy

Mainwaring, Scott·2018·Party Systems in Latin America

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/9781316798553.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Party systems with weak parties produce less-experienced politicians who are less likely to be unconditional supporters of democracy.

    “Finally, party systems with weak parties also produce less-experienced politicians, who, in turn, are ' less likely to be unconditional supporters of democracy. ' (Mainwaring 2018, p 72; see also Kenney 1998)”

    From Parties, Civil Society, and the Deterrence of Democratic Defection (2020) · cites this paper as Mainwaring 2018

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mainwaring, S.
Corresponding author
Mainwaring, Scott
Venue
Party Systems in Latin America
Published
2018-02-02
Pages
71-101
OpenAlex
W4248101392
Cited by
54
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
82.33
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
Keywords
party system institutionalization, democracy, political parties, electoral systems, party competition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review