First-Generation College Student Success
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Program interventions may bolster the success of students in terms of STEM retention by supplementing high school experiences and exposing students to resources at colleges and universities designed to support student success.
“program interventions may bolster the success of students in terms of STEM retention by supplementing high school experiences and exposing students to resources at colleges and universities designed to support student success (Zuo et al., 2018).”
From A Meta-analysis of University STEM Summer Bridge Program Effectiveness (2021) · cites this paper as Zuo et al., 2018
Cites
Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans.
Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797 · Cited by 8,181 · see citing works
A Brief Social-Belonging Intervention Improves Academic and Health Outcomes of Minority Students
Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1198364 · Cited by 1,992 · see citing works
Stephens, N. M., Fryberg, S. A., Markus, H. R., Johnson, C. S., & Covarrubias, R. (2012) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0027143 · Cited by 1,312 · see citing works
Recursive Processes in Self-Affirmation: Intervening to Close the Minority Achievement Gap
Cohen, G. L., Garcia, J., Purdie-Vaughns, V., Apfel, N., & Brzustoski, P. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1170769 · Cited by 800 · see citing works
Sherman, D. A. K., Nelson, L. D., & Steele, C. M. (2000) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672002611003 · Cited by 660 · see citing works
Stephens, N. M., Hamedani, M. G., & Destin, M. (2014) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797613518349 · Cited by 612 · see citing works
Kim, Y. K., & Sax, L. J. (2009) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s11162-009-9127-x · Cited by 510 · see citing works
Comparing the Determinants of Persistence for First-Generation and Continuing-Generation Students
Martin Lohfink, M., & Paulsen, M. B. (2005) · Journal of College Student Development · doi:10.1353/csd.2005.0040 · Cited by 469 · see citing works
Allen, J., Robbins, S. B., Casillas, A., & Oh, I.-S. (2008) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s11162-008-9098-3 · Cited by 430 · see citing works
Self-citationSherman, D. K., Hartson, K. A., Binning, K. R., Purdie-Vaughns, V., Garcia, J., Taborsky-Barba, S., Tomassetti, S., Nussbaum, A. D., & Cohen, G. L. (2013) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0031495 · Cited by 371 · see citing works
Ewing, K. M., Richardson, T. Q., James-Myers, L., & Russell, R. K. (1996) · Journal of Black Psychology · doi:10.1177/00957984960221005 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Meta-analysis of University STEM Summer Bridge Program Effectiveness
Bradford, B. C., Beier, M. E., & Oswald, F. L. (2021) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.20-03-0046 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Zuo, C., Mulfinger, E., Oswald, F. L., & Casillas, A.
- Venue
- The First Year of College
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2018-01-04
- Pages
- 55-90
- OpenAlex
- W2781779978
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 1.58
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Education and Military Integration
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
- Keywords
- first-generation college students, student success, college access, higher education equity, student retention
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
