Cited by 10

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Collaborating Beyond Collections: Engaging Tribes in Museum Exhibits

Goff, Sheila, Chapoose, Betsy, Cook, Elizabeth, Voirol, Shannon·2019·Advances in Archaeological Practice

Abstract

There has been—and continues to be—tension between Native peoples and museums in the United States due to past collecting practices and exhibitions that strive to interpret their culture and history without their involvement. Previously, many of these exhibitions stereotyped and lumped Native peoples together, depicting their cultures as static and interpreting them and their material culture from a Western scientific perspective. Changes are being made. Collaboration between Native peoples and museums in all areas of museum work, including exhibitions, is beginning to be considered by many as a best practice. Exhibitions developed in collaboration with Native peoples, with shared curatorial authority, decidedly help ease the historic tension between the two, and they are much more vibrant and accurate than when collaboration is lacking. This article will provide three examples of collaboration, defined with our tribal partners, to develop exhibitions at History Colorado, the state history museum, concluding with lessons learned.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/aap.2019.11

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. McKeown, 2010, MRM5 Museum Registration Methods, 448
  2. 10.7208/chicago/9780226299044.001.0001 · DOI
  3. Gazi, 2014, Exhibition Ethics—An Overview of Major Issues, Journal of Conservation and Museum Studies, 12
  4. Dovers, 2015, Protected Area Governance and Management, 415
  5. 10.17730/praa.33.2.mv07j4327231542u · DOI
  6. 10.2979/jfolkrese.52.1.39 · DOI
  7. Ambler, 2013, Accomplishing NAGPRA, 195
  8. Shannon, 2015, Artifacts of Collaboration at the National Museum of the American Indian, Journal of Marxism and Interdisciplinary Inquiry, 7, 37
  9. Lonetree, 2012, Decolonizing Museums
  10. Fine-Dare, 2002, Grave Injustice: The American Indian Repatriation Movement and NAGPRA

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 10

Metadata

Authors
Goff, S., Chapoose, B., Cook, E., & Voirol, S.
Venue
Advances in Archaeological Practice
Published
2019-05-28
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
224-233
ISSN
2326-3768
Cited by
10
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review