Cited by 3Indigenous Cultures and HistoryCultural Identity and HeritageIndigenous Peoples' Rights and Law

Pathways to Repatriation for NAGPRA Practitioners: Introduction

Open access
Yann, Jessica, Domeischel, Jenna, Roberts Thompson, Amanda, Schreiner, Nina M.·2025·Advances in Archaeological Practice

Abstract

Three decades after the initial five-year deadline for compliance, federal agencies and museums have once more been called to account for their failure to return Ancestors and cultural items to Tribal Nations under the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 1990 (NAGPRA). In April 2024 more than 70 practitioners collaborated in forums and paper and poster sessions to produce the first ever “Day of NAGPRA” at the 89th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology in New Orleans. The overwhelming success of this effort is as clear a barometer as any for the current need in the discipline for more conversation, better resources, increased opportunities, and—above all—the chance at a truly collaborative push for a complete return of all Ancestors and their belongings to their communities. In this article, we set up our thematic issue by introducing readers to the various contributions concerning duty of care, education, and policy implementation inspired and informed by the “Day of NAGPRA.”, ResumenTreinta anos después de su cumplimiento, las agencias federales y los museos han sido nuevamente llamados a rendir cuentas por no haber devuelto los antepasados y objetos culturales de sus colecciones a las Naciones Tribales, de acuerdo con la Ley de Protección y Repatriación de Tumbas de Nativos Americanos de 1990 (NAGPRA, por sus siglas en inglés). En abril de 2024, más de 70 profesionales colaboraron en foros y sesiones de ponencias y pósteres para organizar el primer “Día de la ley NAGPRA” durante la octogésima novena Reunión Anual de la Sociedad de Arqueología Americana (SAA por sus siglas inglés) en New Orleans. El rotundo éxito de esta iniciativa es un claro indicador de la necesidad actual en nuestra disciplina para más diálogo, mejores recursos, más oportunidades y, sobre todo, la posibilidad de un esfuerzo verdaderamente colaborativo para la completa devolución de todos los antepasados y sus pertenencias a las comunidades donde pertenecen. En este artículo presentamos nuestra sección temática mostrando a los lectores las diversas contribuciones sobre el deber de cuidar, educar e implementar políticas inspiradas e informadas por el “Día de la ley NAGPRA”.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/aap.2025.10107

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Tsosie, 2012, NAGPRA and the Problem of “Culturally Unidentifiable” Remains: The Argument for a Human Rights Framework, Arizona State Law Journal, 44, 809
  2. Trope, 1992, Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act: Background and Legislative History, Arizona State Law Journal, 24, 35
  3. Yellow Bird, 2012, NAGPRA at Twenty: A Report Card, Arizona State Law Journal, 44, 921
  4. Fine-Dare, 2002, Grave Injustice: The American Indian Repatriation Movement and NAGPRA
  5. Lambert, 2019, Thirty Years Later: Recommendations for Museum Compliance with NAGPRA and Utah State Laws, Utah Archaeology, 32, 115

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yann, J., Domeischel, J., Roberts Thompson, A., & Schreiner, N. M.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • United States Army Corps of Engineers (US)
  • University of Georgia
  • University of South Carolina (US)
Corresponding author
Yann, Jessica
Venue
Advances in Archaeological Practice
Published
2025-08
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
357-363
ISSN
2326-3768 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7106851473
Cited by
2
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
4.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Advances in Archaeological Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Cultural Identity and Heritage
  • Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
Keywords
NAGPRA, repatriation, ancestral remains, cultural property, tribal nations, museums, federal agencies, duty of care, policy implementation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review