Cited by 2

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Emerging Uses of 3D Technologies in the Practice of Repatriation and Revitalization

Hollinger, R. Eric·2025·Advances in Archaeological Practice

Abstract

Overview: Digital technologies, including 3D digitization and replication, are increasingly integrated into repatriation-related work by museums and Indigenous communities. Repatriation laws began being adopted in the United States at state level in 1976, followed by federal repatriation laws in 1989 with the National Museum of the American Indian (NMAI) Act, which applies only to the museums of the Smithsonian Institution, and in 1990 with the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA). Early repatriation, therefore, was in the predigital age, but the use of computers and databases, including digital imaging, email, and file-sharing, has had a significant impact, first with 2D digital technologies and more recently with the incorporation of 3D digitization. These, and the creation of surrogates of archival and object collections, have led to an explosion of information-sharing between museums and Indigenous partners. 2D digitization and 3D digitization and replication, in consultation and collaboration with Indigenous communities, are emerging as important tools alongside repatriation efforts—not in lieu of repatriation but as supplements to mutual interests that go beyond it. Here, the experiences of the Smithsonian’s National Museum of Natural History and others are offered as examples of such new applications of 3D in the context of repatriation and beyond.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/aap.2025.10096

Cites

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Joshua DeAsis dances wearing the replica hat. (Photograph by Eric Hollinger.)
Figure 1 Joshua DeAsis dances wearing the replica hat. (Photograph by Eric Hollinger.)CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Figure 2 Milled spruce replica, left , with original dance mask from Igiugig, Alaska. (Photograph by Walter Larrimore.)
Figure 2 Milled spruce replica, left , with original dance mask from Igiugig, Alaska. (Photograph by Walter Larrimore.)CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Figure 3 3D printed replica, left , and original Mother Bear Hat of the Teikweidi clan. (Photograph by Eric Hollinger.)
Figure 3 3D printed replica, left , and original Mother Bear Hat of the Teikweidi clan. (Photograph by Eric Hollinger.)CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Figure 4 The new Sculpin Hat, replicated for the Kiks.ádi clan using 3D digitization and fabrication technology. (Photograph by James DiLoreto.)
Figure 4 The new Sculpin Hat, replicated for the Kiks.ádi clan using 3D digitization and fabrication technology. (Photograph by James DiLoreto.)CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Figure 5 Tlingit Stax'héen Tláa (Stikine Mother) Luella Knapp, of the Naanyaa.ayi clan, using a structured light 3D scanner at the Smithsonian's Museum Support Center to digitize the prow of a 13.7 m long Brown Bear Canoe that belonged to the Naanyaa.ayí clan, whose spokesman was Chief Shakes. (Photograph by Walter Larrimore.)
Figure 5 Tlingit Stax'héen Tláa (Stikine Mother) Luella Knapp, of the Naanyaa.ayi clan, using a structured light 3D scanner at the Smithsonian's Museum Support Center to digitize the prow of a 13.7 m long Brown Bear Canoe that belonged to the Naanyaa.ayí clan, whose spokesman was Chief Shakes. (Photograph by Walter Larrimore.)CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. 10.1016/j.culher.2017.12.001 · DOI
  2. Hollinger, 2022, Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 1: Introduction, 182
  3. Hollinger, 2024, 3D Replication of the Mother Bear Hat for the Teikweidi Clan of Angoon, Alaska, Arctic Studies Center Newsletter, 31, 22
  4. Bell, 2013, Introduction: After the Return, Museum Anthropology Review, 7, 1
  5. 10.5334/jcaa.140 · DOI
  6. Faulkner, 2023, Technology and Tradition: Shaping Indigenous Collections for the Future
  7. 10.1017/aap.2022.7 · DOI
  8. 10.1017/aap.2019.39 · DOI
  9. 10.1017/aap.2023.41 · DOI
  10. Csoba DeHass, 2018, 3D Heritage Preservation and Indigenous Communities in the Circumpolar North, Arctic Yearbook, 1
  11. 10.1017/aaq.2020.59 · DOI
  12. Hollinger, 2013, Tlingit-Smithsonian Collaborations with 3D Digitization of Cultural Objects, Museum Anthropology Review, 7, 201
  13. 10.1111/muan.12280 · DOI
  14. 10.1017/aaq.2024.82 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hollinger, R. E.
Affiliations
National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution
Venue
Advances in Archaeological Practice
Published
2025-08
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
472-479
ISSN
2326-3768
Cited by
2
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review