The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Global Archaeologies of the Long Emancipation: An Introduction
Abstract
This article serves as an introduction to this guest-edited special issue of American Antiquity entitled “Global Archaeologies of the Long Emancipation.” We begin by discussing Rinaldo Walcott's notion of the Long Emancipation, noting how the failed promises of the legal ending of slavery led to sensations of freedom and ongoing forms of anti-Blackness. In response, Black communities have employed various strategies in pursuit of freedom. We then apply this argument to archaeological thought and practice, suggesting that archaeology is well positioned to provide evidence of Black creativity, action, and struggle in a variety of global contexts. The article closes with an overview of this special issue, which includes a brief summary of individual contributions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Dominica (Wai'tukubuli) is a volcanic island located in the Lesser Antilles island chain in the Caribbean (Figure 1; Reilly and Stevens, 2024).”
From An imperium in imperio: A Geospatial Analysis of Defensibility and Accessibility of Maroon Settlements in Dominica (2024) · cites this paper as Reilly and Stevens, 2024
Citations
Cited by
Rodriguez, J., Wallman, D., & Honychurch, L. (2024) · American Antiquity · doi:10.1017/aaq.2024.48 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Reilly, M. C., & Stevens, C.
- ORCID
- Reilly, Matthew C.
- Venue
- American Antiquity
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2024-10
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 547-552
- ISSN
- 0002-7316
- 2325-5064
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.