How Do Zoos ‘Talk’ to Their General Visitors? Do Visitors ‘Listen’? A Mixed Method Investigation of the Communication Between Modern Zoos and Their General Visitors
Abstract
Modern zoos utilise a variety of education tools for communicating with visitors. Previous research has discussed the benefits of providing multiple education communications, yet little research provides an indication of what communications are being employed within zoos today. This research is a two-phased, mixed-methods investigation into the communication between zoos and their general visitors. Phase 1 involved an online questionnaire to which 176 zoos from 50 countries reported on the types of education communications they typically use for their general visitors. The second phase comprised nine zoo case studies, enabling direct observation and face-to-face interviews on site with zoo staff and zoo visitors. The findings of this research provide a snapshot of education communications offered to zoo visitors, and indicate that zoo exhibit signage remains the most prevalent medium. The findings further indicate that 95% of visitors read at least some exhibit signs and that more than 70% of participating zoos utilise person-to-person education. The implications of these findings for improving zoos’ educational communication are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The provision of signage at zoo exhibits is considered the most basic form of conservation education.
“The provision of signage at zoo exhibits is considered the most basic form of conservation education [80,81]”
From Tiger colour morphs in zoos raise conservation and welfare concerns (2026) · cites this paper as [81]
Cites
Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x033007014 · Cited by 11,170 · see citing works
Conservation and Education: Prominent Themes in Zoo Mission Statements
Patrick, P. G., Matthews, C. E., Ayers, D. F., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2007) · The Journal of Environmental Education · doi:10.3200/joee.38.3.53-60 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tiger colour morphs in zoos raise conservation and welfare concerns
Erzinçlioğlu, T. S., Piaz, M. T., Chinpilas, T., Hunnestad, A. V., Godfrey, L., & Fourage, A. (2026) · Discover Animals · doi:10.1007/s44338-026-00163-5
- Authors
- Roe, K., McConney, A., & Mansfield, C. F.
- Affiliations
- Murdoch University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Roe, Katie
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Environmental Education
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2014-12
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 167-186
- ISSN
- 0814-0626 (ISSN-L)
- 2049-775X
- OpenAlex
- W2161933088
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 25.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Australian Journal of Environmental Education (publishedVersion)
- Murdoch University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Museology › Museums and Cultural Heritage
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Animal and Plant Science Education
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
- Keywords
- zoos, educational communication, zoo staff, visitor engagement, zoo exhibits
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review