Cited by 73Crime Patterns and InterventionsCriminal Justice and PenologyLaw, Economics, and Judicial Systems

Incidence and Costs of Personal and Property Crimes in the USA, 2017

Open access
Miller, Ted R., Cohen, Mark A., Swedler, David I., Ali, Bina, Hendrie, Delia V.·2021·Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis

Abstract

Total cost estimates for crime in the USA are both out-of-date and incomplete. We estimated incidence and costs of personal crimes (both violent and non-violent) and property crimes in 2017. Incidence came from national arrest data, multi-state estimates of police-reported crimes per arrest, national victimization and road crash surveys, and police underreporting studies. We updated and expanded upon published unit costs. Estimated crime costs totaled $2.6 trillion ($620 billion in monetary costs plus quality of life losses valued at $1.95 trillion; 95 % uncertainty interval $2.2–$3.0 trillion). Violent crime accounted for 85 % of costs. Principal contributors to the 10.9 million quality-adjusted life years lost were sexual violence, physical assault/robbery, and child maltreatment. Monetary expenditures caused by criminal victimization represent 3 % of Gross Domestic Product – equivalent to the amount spent on national defense. These estimates exclude the additional costs of preventing and avoiding crime such as enhanced lighting and burglar alarms. They also exclude crimes against businesses and most white-collar and corporate offenses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/bca.2020.36

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The economic costs of crime in the US as of 2017 are estimated by Miller et al. (2021) and cover both reported and unreported incidents.

    “To calculate the fiscal externality of the program, we account for government costs and savings using the estimates from Miller et al. (2021) on the economic costs of crime in the US as of 2017, which cover both reported and unreported incidents.”

    From What is the Best Response? Examining the Impact of Police and Their Alternatives (2025) · cites this paper as Miller et al. (2021)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, T. R., Cohen, M. A., Swedler, D. I., Ali, B., & Hendrie, D. V.
Affiliations
  • Curtin University (AU)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Pacific Institute For Research and Evaluation (US)
Venue
Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis
Published
2021
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
24-54
ISSN
  • 2152-2812 (ISSN-L)
  • 2194-5888
OpenAlex
W3128196534
Cited by
73
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
9.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
Keywords
crime costs, crime incidence, personal crime, property crime, violent crime, non-violent crime, crime victimization, quality of life loss, quality-adjusted life years, sexual violence, physical assault, robbery, child abuse, underreporting of crime, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review