Cited by 1,122Child Abuse and TraumaChild Welfare and AdoptionChild Abuse and Related Trauma

The economic burden of child maltreatment in the United States and implications for prevention

Open access
Fang, Xiangming, Brown, Derek S., Florence, Curtis S., Mercy, James A.·2012·Child Abuse & Neglect

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To present new estimates of the average lifetime costs per child maltreatment victim and aggregate lifetime costs for all new child maltreatment cases incurred in 2008 using an incidence-based approach. METHODS: This study used the best available secondary data to develop cost per case estimates. For each cost category, the paper used attributable costs whenever possible. For those categories that attributable cost data were not available, costs were estimated as the product of incremental effect of child maltreatment on a specific outcome multiplied by the estimated cost associated with that outcome. The estimate of the aggregate lifetime cost of child maltreatment in 2008 was obtained by multiplying per-victim lifetime cost estimates by the estimated cases of new child maltreatment in 2008. RESULTS: The estimated average lifetime cost per victim of nonfatal child maltreatment is $210,012 in 2010 dollars, including $32,648 in childhood health care costs; $10,530 in adult medical costs; $144,360 in productivity losses; $7,728 in child welfare costs; $6,747 in criminal justice costs; and $7,999 in special education costs. The estimated average lifetime cost per death is $1,272,900, including $14,100 in medical costs and $1,258,800 in productivity losses. The total lifetime economic burden resulting from new cases of fatal and nonfatal child maltreatment in the United States in 2008 is approximately $124 billion. In sensitivity analysis, the total burden is estimated to be as large as $585 billion. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with other health problems, the burden of child maltreatment is substantial, indicating the importance of prevention efforts to address the high prevalence of child maltreatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.10.006

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Child sexual abuse has significant costs for institutions in health care, education, welfare assistance, child protection, and justice systems.

    “These consequences are far-reaching into families and communities, with significant costs for institutions in terms of primary and rehabilitative health care, education and welfare assistance, child protection, and justice system costs (Fang 2012).”

    From School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse (2015) · cites this paper as Fang 2012

    The Methods sections estimate health care, special education, child welfare, and criminal justice costs associated with child maltreatment. But the Discussion says the paper did not estimate costs by type of maltreatment, so those costs cannot all be attributed specifically to child sexual abuse. The copy addresses child welfare services, not welfare assistance as a separate cost category; page numbers were not provided. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fang, X., Brown, D. S., Florence, C. S., & Mercy, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • RTI International (US)
Corresponding author
Fang, Xiangming
Venue
Child Abuse & Neglect
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-02
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
156-165
ISSN
0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2167783241
Cited by
1,122
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 95 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 111 · 2019: 91 · 2018: 111 · 2017: 112 · 2016: 101 · 2015: 100 · 2014: 69 · 2013: 52 · 2012: 16
FWCI
86.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (200-2008-M-28149)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Child Abuse and Related Trauma
Keywords
child abuse, economic burden, lifetime costs, child abuse prevention, productivity loss, criminal justice costs, special education costs, cost estimation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Child, Preschool, Costs and Cost Analysis, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Middle Aged, United States, Health Care Costs, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review