Do we need to know about cyberscams in neurorehabilitation? A cross-sectional scoping survey of Australasian clinicians and service providers
Open accessAbstract
Cyberscams, such as romance scams, are prevalent and costly online hazards in the general community. People with Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) may be particularly vulnerable and have greater difficulty recovering from the resultant emotional and financial hardships. In order to build capacity in the neurorehabilitation sector, it is necessary to determine whether clinicians currently encounter this issue and what prevention and intervention approaches have been found effective. This scoping study aimed to explore clinicians’ exposure to and experiences with cyberscams in their adult clients with ABI. Method: Participants were clinicians recruited from multidisciplinary networks across Australia and New Zealand. Eligible participants (n = 101) completed an online customised survey. Results: More than half (53.46%) the participants had one or more clients affected by cyberscams, predominantly romance scams. Cognitive impairments and loneliness were reportedly associated with increased vulnerability. Cyberscams impacted treatment provision and were emotionally challenging for participants. No highly effective interventions were identified. Conclusions: These findings indicate that cyberscams are a clinical issue relevant to neurorehabilitation providers, with prevalence studies now required. The lack of effective interventions identified underscores the need for the development of evidence-based prevention and treatment approaches to ultimately help people with ABI safely participate in online life.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414 · see citing works
Correlates of susceptibility to scams in older adults without dementia
James, B. D., Boyle, P. A., & Bennett, D. A. (2014) · Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1080/08946566.2013.821809 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
The online dating romance scam: causes and consequences of victimhood
Buchanan, T., & Whitty, M. T. (2014) · Psychology, Crime & Law · doi:10.1080/1068316x.2013.772180 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Whitty, M. T. (2013) · British Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1093/bjc/azt009 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Whitty, M. T., & Buchanan, T. (2016) · Criminology & Criminal Justice · doi:10.1177/1748895815603773 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
The Online Romance Scam: A Serious Cybercrime
Whitty, M. T., & Buchanan, T. (2012) · Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2011.0352 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Do You Love Me? Psychological Characteristics of Romance Scam Victims
Whitty, M. T. (2018) · Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2016.0729 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Mild Cognitive Impairment and Susceptibility to Scams in Old Age
Han, S. D., Boyle, P. A., James, B. D., Yu, L., & Bennett, D. A. (2015) · Journal of Alzheimer's Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-150442 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Who can spot an online romance scam?
Whitty, M. T. (2019) · Journal of Financial Crime · doi:10.1108/jfc-06-2018-0053 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
The Role Of Love Stories In Romance Scams: A Qualitative Analysis Of Fraudulent Profiles
Kopp, C., Layton, R., Sillitoe, J., & Gondal, I. (2016) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.56227 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tainted Love: a Systematic Literature Review of Online Romance Scam Research
Bilz, A., Shepherd, L. A., & Johnson, G. I. (2023) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1093/iwc/iwad048 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gould, K. R., Carolan, M., & Ponsford, J. L.
- Affiliations
- Epworth Hospital (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Gould, Kate Rachel
- Venue
- Brain Impairment
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 2022-05-05
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 229-244
- ISSN
- 1443-9646 (ISSN-L)
- 1839-5252
- OpenAlex
- W4228999586
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 2.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Brain Impairment (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
- Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Keywords
- romance scams, acquired brain injury, neurorehabilitation, clinician experience, cognitive impairment, loneliness, scam prevention, online participation
- MeSH terms
- Neurological Rehabilitation, Adult, Brain Injuries, Cross-Sectional Studies, Emotions, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review