Myth and Philosophy from the Presocratics to Plato
Abstract
This book explores the dynamic relationship between myth and philosophy in the Presocratics, the Sophists, and in Plato - a relationship which is found to be more extensive and programmatic than has been recognized. The story of philosophy's relationship with myth is that of its relationship with literary and social convention. The intellectuals studied here wanted to reformulate popular ideas about cultural authority and they achieved this goal by manipulating myth. Their self-conscious use of myth creates a self-reflective philosophic sensibility and draws attention to problems inherent in different modes of linguistic representation. Much of the reception of Greek philosophy stigmatizes myth as 'irrational'. Such an approach ignores the important role played by myth in Greek philosophy, not just as a foil but as a mode of philosophical thought. The case studies in this book reveal myth deployed as a result of methodological reflection, and as a manifestation of philosophical concerns.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cosmologisation of gods is different from allegorisation and rationalisation of myths, both of which tend to see the traditional gods as metaphors of various and not essentially cosmological entities.
“Cosmologisation of gods is also different from allegorisation and rationalisation of myths, both of which tend to see the traditional gods as metaphors of various and not essentially cosmological entities.”
From Traditional and Cosmic Gods in Later Plato and the Early Academy (2023) · cites this paper as Morgan (2000)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Traditional and Cosmic Gods in Later Plato and the Early Academy
Bartninkas, V. (2023) · Cambridge University Press · doi:10.1017/9781009322638 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Morgan, K. A.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Morgan, Kathryn A.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2000-08-17
- OpenAlex
- W4298592008
- Cited by
- 426
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 18.02
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Classical Philosophy and Thought
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Classical Antiquity Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › General Arts and Humanities › Cultural and Mythological Studies
- Keywords
- myth and philosophy, Presocratic philosophy, sophists, Plato, ancient Greek philosophy, reception of Greek philosophy, literary conventions, social conventions, cultural authority, linguistic representation, methodological reflection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review