The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Slaving as historical process: examples from the ancient Mediterranean and the modern Atlantic
Abstract
This chapter explores dynamic aspects of the book editors' challenge to consider the rise and demise of ‘slave systems’ in the ancient Mediterranean and in the emergently modern Atlantic – but it offers a historical approach to recurrent slaving as incremental processes of change in place of the structural premise of abstract and implicitly static ‘slave systems’ that underlies the method of comparison implicitly proposed, and also nearly all the current literature on slavery. Slavers marginal to particular historical contexts in which they lived, earlier and later, found both means and motivation to advance themselves, at the expense of rivals in control of, but limited to, local resources by acquiring outsiders whom they exclusively controlled. This recurrent historical dialectic, uniquely contextualized in both ancient times and the modern Atlantic, as well as elsewhere in the world, identifies similarities and differences in the historical dynamics that explain the resulting parallels and contrasts that conventional comparisons in structural terms describe. Slaving is fundamentally a historical process, as slaving strategies achieved prominence primarily in times and places where rapid military or economic expansion facilitated access to outsiders. It was also, thus, generally a by-product, a secondary strategy, arising from specifiable tensions within larger and more complex historical processes. Significant slaving and integration of the slaves in turn contributed to still others.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Miller (2008, p 70) likewise labels slavery a ' recurrent historical dialectic '”
From Collapsing the Boundaries Between De Jure and De Facto Slavery: The Foundations of Slavery Beyond the Transatlantic Frame (2020) · cites this paper as Miller (2008, p 70)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Schwarz, K., & Nicholson, A. (2020) · Human Rights Review · doi:10.1007/s12142-020-00604-y · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Miller, J. C.
- Corresponding author
- Miller, Joseph C.
- ORCID
- Miller, Joseph C.
- Venue
- Slave Systems
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2008-03-13
- Pages
- 70-102
- OpenAlex
- W3015189613
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 20.77
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Colonialism, slavery, and trade
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › History of Colonial Brazil
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Classics › Classical Antiquity Studies
- Keywords
- slavery, slave system, ancient Mediterranean, transatlantic slave trade, comparative history of slavery, historical process, military expansion, economic expansion, slaveholders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Slaving as historical process: examples from the ancient Mediterranean and the modern Atlantic. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511482748.003
- The paper
- Miller, J. C. (2008). Slaving as historical process: examples from the ancient Mediterranean and the modern Atlantic. Slave Systems. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511482748.003