Bibliography and the Sociology of Texts
Abstract
In Bibliography and the Sociology of Texts, D. F. McKenzie shows how the material form of texts crucially determines their meanings. He unifies the principal interests of both critical theory and textual scholarship to demonstrate that, as all works of lasting value are reproduced, re-edited and re-read, they take on different forms and meanings. By witnessing the new needs of their new readers these new forms constitute vital evidence for any history of reading. McKenzie shows this is true of all forms of recorded information, including sound, graphics, films, representations of landscape and the new electronic media. The bibliographical skills first developed for manuscripts and books can, he shows, be applied to a wide range of cultural documents. This book, which incorporates McKenzie's classic work on orality and literacy in early New Zealand, offers a unifying concept of texts that seeks to acknowledge their variety and the complexity of their relationships.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Using the ash of a burned talisman to exorcise illness like gu became very well-known as a Daoist practice for healing purposes at least from the second century onward.
“Using the ash of a burned talisman to exorcise illness like gu became very well-known as a Daoist practice for healing purposes at least from the second century onward.”
From Enchantment, Charming, and the Notion of the Femme Fatalein Early Chinese Historiography (2013) · cites this paper as [58]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Enchantment, Charming, and the Notion of the Femme Fatalein Early Chinese Historiography
Zhang, H. (2013) · Asian Medicine · doi:10.1163/15734218-12341317 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- McKenzie, D. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- McKenzie, D. F.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1999-09-16
- OpenAlex
- W1541431938
- Cited by
- 941
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 82 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 29
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Libraries, Manuscripts, and Books
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Digital Humanities and Scholarship
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
- Keywords
- sociology of texts, textual materiality, textual meaning, history of reading, textual scholarship, critical theory, orality and literacy, electronic media
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review