The DOI matches its Crossref record.
From mirror neurons to imitation: Facts and speculations
Abstract
Introduction This chapter is composed of two parts. In the first we review the functional properties of an intriguing class of premotor neurons that we discovered in the monkey premotor cortex: the “mirror neurons.” These neurons discharge both when the monkey performs an action and when it observes another individual making a similar action. The second part is basically speculative. It is based on the hypothesis that there is a very general, evolutionary ancient mechanism, that we will name “resonance” mechanism, through which pictorial descriptions of motor behaviors are matched directly on the observer's motor “representations” of the same behaviors. We will posit that resonance mechanism is a fundamental mechanism at the basis of inter-individual relations including some behaviors commonly described under the heading of “imitation.” Functional properties of area F5 Motor properties Area F5 forms the rostral part of inferior area 6 (Matelli et al ., 1985). Microstimulation and single-neuron studies showed that F5 contains a hand and a mouth movement representation (Gentilucci et al ., 1988; Hepp-Reymond, Husler, Maier, & Qi, 1994; Okano & Tanji, 1987; Rizzolatti et al ., 1981; Rizzolatti et al ., 1988). Particularly interesting results were obtained when F5 neurons were studied in a semi-naturalistic context (Rizzolatti et al ., 1988). Awake monkeys were seated on a primate chair and presented with various objects (geometrical solids, pieces of food of different size and shape). The stimuli were introduced in various spatial locations around the monkey, inside and outside its peripersonal space.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Embodiment in attitudes, social perception, and emotion
Niedenthal, P. M., Barsalou, L. W., Winkielman, P., Krauth-Gruber, S., & Ric, F. (2005) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0903_1 · Cited by 1,484
Cooperative Breeding and Human Cognitive Evolution
Burkart, J. M., Hrdy, S. B., & Van Schaik, C. P. (2009) · Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews · doi:10.1002/evan.20222 · Cited by 646
Perceiving affect from arm movement
Pollick, F. E., Paterson, H. M., Bruderlin, A., & Sanford, A. J. (2001) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(01)00147-0 · Cited by 616
Hurley, S. (2008) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x07003123 · Cited by 512
McIntosh, D. N., Reichmann‐Decker, A., Winkielman, P., & Wilbarger, J. L. (2006) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00492.x · Cited by 466
Metadata
- Authors
- Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V.
- Venue
- The Imitative Mind
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2002-04-18
- Pages
- 247-266
- OpenAlex
- W1561028014
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 41.37
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: From mirror neurons to imitation: Facts and speculations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511489969.015
- The paper
- Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2002). From mirror neurons to imitation: Facts and speculations. The Imitative Mind. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511489969.015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.