Cited by 646Primate Behavior and EcologyLanguage and cultural evolutionChild and Animal Learning Development

Cooperative Breeding and Human Cognitive Evolution

Open access
Burkart, J. M., Hrdy, S. B., Van Schaik, C. P.·2009·Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews

Abstract

Despite sharing a recent common ancestor, humans are surprisingly different from other great apes. The most obvious discontinuities are related to our cognitive abilities, including language, but we also have a markedly different, cooperative breeding system. Among many nonhuman primates and mammals in general, cooperative breeding is accompanied by psychological changes leading to greater prosociality, which directly enhances performance in social cognition. Here we propose that these cognitive consequences of cooperative breeding could have become more pervasive in the human lineage because the psychological changes were added to an ape‐level cognitive system capable of understanding simple mental states, albeit mainly in competitive contexts. Once more prosocial motivations were added, these cognitive abilities could also be used for cooperative purposes, including a willingness to share mental states, thereby enabling the emergence of shared intentionality. Shared intentionality has been identified as the original source of many uniquely human cognitive abilities, including cumulative culture and language. Shared intentionality rests on a fundamentally prosocial disposition that is strikingly absent in chimpanzees, but present in cooperatively breeding primates. Thus, our hypothesis is that while chimpanzees and perhaps all great apes exhibit many of the important cognitive preconditions for uniquely human mental capacities to evolve, they lack the psychological preconditions. In humans, we argue, the two components merged, the cognitive component due to common descent from ape ancestors and the motivational component due to convergent evolution of traits typical of many cooperative breeders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/evan.20222

Cites

149 of 149 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Over the course of human evolution, a large social brain emerged, with distinctive capacities from those of chimpanzees, accompanied by intense child raising.

    “Over the course of human evolution, a large social brain emerged, with distinctive capacities from those of chimpanzees, accompanied by intense child raising (Burkart et al., 2009; Hrdy, 2009a).”

    From The evolved nest, oxytocin functioning, and prosocial development (2023) · cites this paper as Burkart et al., 2009

  • Humanity's heritage of raising children together is associated with psychological changes that enhance social relations such as mind reading and shared intentionality.

    “Humanity’s heritage of raising children together is associated with psychological changes that enhance social relations such as mind reading and shared intentionality (Burkart et al., 2009).”

    From The evolved nest, oxytocin functioning, and prosocial development (2023) · cites this paper as Burkart et al. (2009)

  • The empathic experience of encounter with nature is elementary for the development of a care relationship and may be the driver of future engagement for further restoration projects.

    “The empathic experience of this encounter is elementary for the development of a “care” relationship and may be the driver of future engagement for further restoration projects [190,191].”
  • The argument is that cooperative breeding was a feature of the genus Homo from H. erectus onward, close to 2 million years ago.

    “First, the argument made by Hrdy (2009), Burkart et al. (2009), and Burkart and van Schaik (2016) is that cooperative breeding was a feature of the genus Homo from H. erectus onward, close to 2 million years ago.”
  • Cooperative breeding became an important feature of early Homo society and selected for increased social tolerance.

    “Burkart et al. (2009), Hrdy (2009), and Burkart and van Schaik (2016) proposed that cooperative breeding, a social system in which individuals help rear others’ offspring at a cost to their own reproductive effort, became an important feature of early Homo society and selected for increased social tolerance.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 151 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burkart, J. M., Hrdy, S. B., & Van Schaik, C. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Burkart, J. M.
Venue
Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-09
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
175-186
ISSN
  • 1060-1538 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6505
OpenAlex
W2019887455
Cited by
646
References
151
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 32
FWCI
25.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Evolutionary Anthropology Issues News and Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
cooperative breeding, human cognitive evolution, prosocial behavior, shared intentionality, social cognition, language evolution, cumulative culture, chimpanzees, great apes, convergent evolution, theory of mind

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review