The DOI matches its Crossref record; 93 of the 93 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Realist Tradition and the Limits of International Relations
Abstract
Realism is commonly portrayed as theory that reduces international relations to pure power politics. Michael Williams provides an important reexamination of the Realist tradition and its relevance for contemporary international relations. Examining three thinkers commonly invoked as Realism's foremost proponents - Hobbes, Rousseau, and Morgenthau - the book shows that, far from advocating a crude realpolitik, Realism's most famous classical proponents actually stressed the need for a restrained exercise of power and a politics with ethics at its core. These ideas are more relevant than ever at a time when the nature of responsible responses to international problems are at the centre of contemporary political debate. This original interpretation of major thinkers will interest scholars of international relations and the history of ideas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social Theory of International Politics
Wendt, A. (1999) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511612183 · Cited by 7,664
Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity
Rorty, R. (1989) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804397 · Cited by 6,740
Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics
Wendt, A. (1992) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818300027764 · Cited by 5,885
Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory
Cox, R. W. (1981) · Millennium: Journal of International Studies · doi:10.1177/03058298810100020501 · Cited by 2,952
The False Promise of International Institutions
Mearsheimer, J. J. (1994) · International Security · doi:10.2307/2539078 · Cited by 2,680
“Let's Argue!”: Communicative Action in World Politics
Risse, T. (2000) · International Organization · doi:10.1162/002081800551109 · Cited by 2,498
Skinner, Q. (1997) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139171274 · Cited by 2,268
A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 1,928
Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy
Rose, G. (1998) · World Politics · doi:10.1017/s0043887100007814 · Cited by 1,793
Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change
(1993) · Cornell University Press eBooks · doi:10.7591/9781501724992 · Cited by 1,738
Cited by
Words, Images, Enemies: Securitization and International Politics
Williams, M. C. (2003) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1046/j.0020-8833.2003.00277.x · Cited by 1,152
Self-citationThe Making of Global International Relations: Origins and Evolution of IR at its Centenary
Acharya, A., & Buzan, B. (2019) · doi:10.1017/9781108647670 · Cited by 375
Metadata
- Authors
- Williams, M. C.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2005-01-06
- OpenAlex
- W4298055365
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 93
- FWCI
- 27.23
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Realist Tradition and the Limits of International Relations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511491771
- The paper
- Williams, M. C. (2005). The Realist Tradition and the Limits of International Relations. Cambridge University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511491771
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.