The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse
Schmidt, V. A. (2008) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342 · Cited by 3,388
The Regime Complex for Climate Change
Keohane, R. O., & Victor, D. G. (2011) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592710004068 · Cited by 2,047
European Integration from the 1980s: State‐Centric v. Multi‐level Governance*
Marks, G., Hooghe, L., & Blank, K. (1996) · JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.1996.tb00577.x · Cited by 1,543
Is the good news about compliance good news about cooperation?
Downs, G. W., Rocke, D. M., & Barsoom, P. N. (1996) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818300033427 · Cited by 1,540
Setting the Rules of the Game: The Choice of Electoral Systems in Advanced Democracies
Boix, C. (1999) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2585577 · Cited by 940
Metadata
- Venue
- Cornell University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cornell University Press
- Published
- 1993-01-01
- OpenAlex
- W4237018467
- Cited by
- 1,738
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 56.59
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7591/9781501724992
- The paper
- Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change. (1993). Cornell University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501724992
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
