Cited by 295Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational TheoryBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

Loops, Knots, Gauge Theories and Quantum Gravity

Gambini, Rodolfo, Pullin, Jorge, Ashtekar, Abhay·1996·Cambridge University Press eBooks

Abstract

Now in paperback, this text provides a self-contained introduction to applications of loop representations and knot theory in particle physics and quantum gravity. Loop representations (and the related topic of knot theory) are of considerable current interest because they provide a unified arena for the study of the gauge invariant quantization of Yang-Mills theories and gravity, and suggest a promising approach to the eventual unification of the four fundamental forces. This text begins with a detailed review of loop representation theory. It then goes on to describe loop representations in Maxwell theory, Yang-Mills theories as well as lattice techniques. Applications in quantum gravity are then discussed in detail. Following chapters move on to consider knot theories, braid theories and extended loop representations in quantum gravity. A final chapter assesses the current status of the theory and points out possible directions for future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9780511524431

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the Cauchy completion proposal, many resulting states are no longer functions of loops in any clear sense; they correspond to extended loops whose geometrical interpretation is not entirely clear.

    “This is a consistent procedure, but many of the resulting states in the Cauchy completion are no longer functions of loops in any clear sense; they correspond instead to “extended loops” [136], whose geometrical interpretation is not entirely clear.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gambini, R., Pullin, J., & Ashtekar, A.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de la República de Uruguay (UY)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Cambridge University Press eBooks
Published
1996-11-13
OpenAlex
W1545837872
Cited by
295
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
FWCI
8.70
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
loop representation, knot theory, gauge theory, Yang-Mills theory, quantum gravity, Maxwell theory, lattice gauge theory, braid theory, gauge invariance, unification of fundamental forces

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review