Cited by 29Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsRelativity and Gravitational TheoryAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models

Eleven-dimensional supergravity as a constrained topological field theory

Open access
Ling, Yi, Smolin, Lee·2001·Nuclear Physics B

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0550-3213(01)00063-3

Cites

104 of 104 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are strong similarities between some ideas of the spin foam approach and those proposed as a conceptual basis for a truly non-perturbative and background-independent form of M-theory [122].

    “the strong similarities between some ideas of the spin foam approach and those proposed to be a conceptual basis for a truly non-perturbative and background-independent form of M-theory [122].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [10][10] B. Bruegmann, R. Gambini and J. Pullin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 431 (1992); Gen. Rel. and Grav. 251 (1993); -
  2. [30][30] R. Capovilla, J. Dell and T. Jacobson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 21, 2325(1989); Class. Quant. Grav. 8, 59(1991); R. Capovilla, J. Dell, T. Jacobson and L. Mason, Class. and Quant. Grav. 8, 41(1991). -
  3. [35][35] P. Fre, Comments on the six index photon in D=11 preprint TH-3884-CERN. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ling, Y., & Smolin, L.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Ling, Yi
  • Smolin, Lee
Venue
Nuclear Physics B
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-05
Volume
601
Issue
1-2
Pages
191-208
ISSN
0550-3213 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007848821
Cited by
29
References
103
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nuclear Physics B (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Imperial College London
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
Keywords
eleven-dimensional supergravity, topological field theory, first-order formulation, local constraints, Lagrange multipliers, supersymmetry algebra, central charge

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review