The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Geometry of Quantum States: An Introduction to Quantum Entanglement
Abstract
Quantum information theory is at the frontiers of physics, mathematics and information science, offering a variety of solutions that are impossible using classical theory. This book provides an introduction to the key concepts used in processing quantum information and reveals that quantum mechanics is a generalisation of classical probability theory. After a gentle introduction to the necessary mathematics the authors describe the geometry of quantum state spaces. Focusing on finite dimensional Hilbert spaces, they discuss the statistical distance measures and entropies used in quantum theory. The final part of the book is devoted to quantum entanglement - a non-intuitive phenomenon discovered by Schrödinger, which has become a key resource for quantum computation. This richly-illustrated book is useful to a broad audience of graduates and researchers interested in quantum information theory. Exercises follow each chapter, with hints and answers supplied.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“An important theorem in classical polarization optics states that any linear optical element ͑either deterministic or stochastic͒ is equivalent to a composite device made of at most four nondepolarizing elements in parallel ͓32͔.”
From Linear optics and quantum maps (2007) · cites this paper as [32]
In the citing paper
“A result that may be useful in this direction of research is the 'concentration of measure effect' of the gate fidelity which implies that as n increases, the measure of the set of states which produce a fidelity close to the minimum yet far from the average is exponentially small in n [41, 42].”
From Characterizing quantum gates via randomized benchmarking (2012) · cites this paper as [42]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Horodecki, R., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, M., & Horodecki, K. (2009) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.865 · Cited by 10,118
Entanglement in many-body systems
Amico, L., Fazio, R., Osterloh, A., & Vedral, V. (2008) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.80.517 · Cited by 3,745
Advances in quantum cryptography
Pirandola, S., Andersen, U. L., Banchi, L., Berta, M., Bunandar, D., Colbeck, R., Englund, D., Gehring, T., Lupo, C., Ottaviani, C., et al. (2020) · Advances in Optics and Photonics · doi:10.1364/aop.361502 · Cited by 2,033
Quantum metrology with nonclassical states of atomic ensembles
Pezzè, L., Smerzi, A., Oberthaler, M. K., Schmied, R., & Treutlein, P. (2018) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.035005 · Cited by 1,864
Advances in Quantum Cryptography
Pirandola, S., Andersen, U. L., Banchi, L., Berta, M., Bunandar, D., Colbeck, R., Englund, D., Gehring, T., Lupo, C., Ottaviani, C., et al. (2019) · White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) · Cited by 1,566
The elusive Heisenberg limit in quantum-enhanced metrology
Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R., Kołodyński, J., & Guţă, M. (2012) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms2067 · Cited by 773
Characterizing Nonclassical Correlations via Local Quantum Uncertainty
Girolami, D., Tufarelli, T., & Adesso, G. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.240402 · Cited by 517
Almost all quantum states have nonclassical correlations
Ferraro, A., Aolita, L., Cavalcanti, D., Cucchietti, F., & Acín, A. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.81.052318 · Cited by 513
Quantacell: powerful charging of quantum batteries
Binder, F. C., Vinjanampathy, S., Modi, K., & Goold, J. (2015) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/17/7/075015 · Cited by 475
Characterizing quantum gates via randomized benchmarking
Magesan, E., Gambetta, J. M., & Emerson, J. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.85.042311 · Cited by 464
Quantum-enhanced measurements without entanglement
Braun, D., Adesso, G., Benatti, F., Floreanini, R., Marzolino, U., Mitchell, M. W., & Pirandola, S. (2018) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.035006 · Cited by 434
Non-adiabatic holonomic quantum computation
Sjöqvist, E., Tong, D. M., Andersson, L. M., Hessmo, B., Johansson, M., & Singh, K. (2012) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/14/10/103035 · Cited by 388
Chiribella, G., D’Ariano, G. M., & Perinotti, P. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.060401 · Cited by 384
Canonical form of master equations and characterization of non-Markovianity
Hall, M. J. W., Cresser, J. D., Li, L., & Andersson, E. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.89.042120 · Cited by 406
“(33) It is also straightforward to check that dS is the matrix representation of the operator (φ⊗1)[|Ψ〉〈Ψ|] in the basis {|a〉 = |α1〉⊗|α2〉}, where |Ψ〉 is the maximally entangled state d ∑ α |α〉 ⊗ |α〉 [45], i.”
BackgroundInfluentialEntanglement of purification through holographic duality
Umemoto, K., & Takayanagi, T. (2018) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-018-0075-2 · Cited by 336
Quantum channels and memory effects
Caruso, F., Giovannetti, V., Lupo, C., & Mancini, S. (2014) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.86.1203 · Cited by 349
A Survey on Quantum Channel Capacities
Gyongyosi, L., Imre, S., & Nguyen, H. V. (2018) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2786748 · Cited by 337
Fuchs, C. A., & Schack, R. (2013) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.85.1693 · Cited by 321
Open-system dynamics of entanglement:a key issues review
Aolita, L., de Melo, F., & Davidovich, L. (2015) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/78/4/042001 · Cited by 328
A Survey on Quantum Channel Capacities
Gyöngyösi, L., Imre, S., & Nguyen, H. V. (2018) · Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) · Cited by 299
Formulation of the uncertainty relations in terms of the Rényi entropies
Białynicki‐Birula, I. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.74.052101 · Cited by 278
Band geometry, Berry curvature, and superfluid weight
Liang, L., Vanhala, T. I., Peotta, S., Siro, T., Harju, A., & Törmä, P. (2017) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.95.024515 · Cited by 280
Generalized Geometric Quantum Speed Limits
Pires, D. P., Cianciaruso, M., Céleri, L. C., Adesso, G., & Soares-Pinto, D. O. (2016) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.6.021031 · Cited by 265
Quantum Fidelity for Arbitrary Gaussian States
Banchi, L., Braunstein, S. L., & Pirandola, S. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.260501 · Cited by 253
Open-system dynamics of entanglement:a key issues review
Aolita, L., de Melo, F., & Davidovich, L. (2015) · Refubium (Universitätsbibliothek der Freien Universität Berlin) · doi:10.17169/refubium-20820 · Cited by 258
Modeling and Control of Quantum Systems: An Introduction
Altafini, C., & Ticozzi, F. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2012.2195830 · Cited by 256
Generalized Clausius inequality for nonequilibrium quantum processes
Deffner, S., & Lutz, E. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.170402 · Cited by 245
Quantum parameter estimation using general single-mode Gaussian states
Pinel, O., Jian, P., Treps, N., Fabre, C., & Braun, D. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.88.040102 · Cited by 246
Quantum discord and its allies: a review of recent progress
Bera, A., Das, T., Sadhukhan, D., Roy, S. S., Sen, A., & Sen, U. (2017) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aa872f · Cited by 229
An invitation to quantum incompatibility
Heinosaari, T., Miyadera, T., & Ziman, M. (2016) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/49/12/123001 · Cited by 238
Measuring Gaussian Quantum Information and Correlations Using the Rényi Entropy of Order 2
Adesso, G., Girolami, D., & Serafini, A. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.190502 · Cited by 223
Essential entanglement for atomic and molecular physics
Tichy, M. C., Mintert, F., & Buchleitner, A. (2011) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/0953-4075/44/19/192001 · Cited by 221
Entanglement witnesses: construction, analysis and classification
Chruściński, D., & Sarbicki, G. (2014) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/47/48/483001 · Cited by 231
Distribution of Quantum Coherence in Multipartite Systems
Radhakrishnan, C., Parthasarathy, M., Jambulingam, S., & Byrnes, T. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.150504 · Cited by 212
Julku, A., Peltonen, T. J., Liang, L., et al. (2020) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.101.060505 · Cited by 210
Quantifying entanglement resources
Eltschka, C., & Siewert, J. (2014) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/47/42/424005 · Cited by 227
Energy–time uncertainty relation for driven quantum systems
Deffner, S., & Lutz, E. (2013) · Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/46/33/335302 · Cited by 199
An introductory review of the resource theory approach to thermodynamics
Lostaglio, M. (2019) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ab46e5 · Cited by 218
Quantum-coherence quantifiers based on the Tsallis relative α entropies
Rastegin, A. E. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.93.032136 · Cited by 190
Multi-parameter estimation beyond quantum Fisher information
Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R., Górecki, W., & Guţǎ, M. (2020) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ab8ef3 · Cited by 221
Generating random density matrices
Życzkowski, K., Penson, K. A., Nechita, I., & Collins, B. (2011) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3595693 · Cited by 201
Self-citationJevtic, S., Pusey, M. F., Jennings, D. H., & Rudolph, T. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.020402 · Cited by 187
Surface/state correspondence as a generalized holography
Miyaji, M., & Takayanagi, T. (2015) · Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics · doi:10.1093/ptep/ptv089 · Cited by 184
Naimark-Dilated PT -Symmetric Brachistochrone
Günther, U., & Samsonov, B. F. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.230404 · Cited by 177
Ultimate Precision Limits for Noisy Frequency Estimation
Smirne, A., Kołodyński, J., Huelga, S. F., & Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.120801 · Cited by 183
Efficient tools for quantum metrology with uncorrelated noise
Kołodyński, J., & Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R. (2013) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/15/7/073043 · Cited by 176
Toward computability of trace distance discord
Ciccarello, F., Tufarelli, T., & Giovannetti, V. (2014) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/1/013038 · Cited by 176
Maximal coherence and the resource theory of purity
Streltsov, A., Kampermann, H., Wölk, S., Gessner, M., & Bruß, D. (2018) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aac484 · Cited by 181
Absolutely maximally entangled states, combinatorial designs, and multiunitary matrices
Goyeneche, D., Alsina, D. A., Latorre, J. I., Riera, A., & Życzkowski, K. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.032316 · Cited by 161
Self-citationA short review on entanglement in quantum spin systems
Latorre, J. I., & Riera, A. (2009) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/42/50/504002 · Cited by 235
Modeling and Control of Quantum Systems: An introduction
Altafini, C., & Ticozzi, F. (2016) · Cited by 171
Multiqubit systems: highly entangled states and entanglement distribution
Borràs, A., Plastino, A. R., Batle, J. A. I., Zander, C., Casas, M., & Plastino, A. R. (2007) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/40/44/018 · Cited by 165
Squashing Models for Optical Measurements in Quantum Communication
Beaudry, N. J., Moroder, T., & Lütkenhaus, N. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.093601 · Cited by 153
Generalization in Quantum Machine Learning: A Quantum Information Standpoint
Banchi, L., Pereira, J. L., & Pirandola, S. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.040321 · Cited by 175
Uhlmann fidelity between two-mode Gaussian states
Marian, P., & Marian, T. A. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.86.022340 · Cited by 143
Metric character of the quantum Jensen-Shannon divergence
Lamberti, P. W., Majtey, A. P., Borràs, A., Casas, M., & Plastino, A. R. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.77.052311 · Cited by 147
Exciton transfer dynamics and quantumness of energy transfer in the Fenna-Matthews-Olson complex
Nalbach, P., Braun, D., & Thorwart, M. (2011) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.84.041926 · Cited by 143
Polynomially Filtered Exact Diagonalization Approach to Many-Body Localization
Sierant, P., Lewenstein, M., & Zakrzewski, J. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.156601 · Cited by 161
Calsamiglia, J., Muñoz-Tapia, R., Masanes, L., Acín, A., & Bagán, E. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.77.032311 · Cited by 144
Reconstruction of Gaussian quantum mechanics from Liouville mechanics with an epistemic restriction
Bartlett, S. D., Rudolph, T., & Spekkens, R. W. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.86.012103 · Cited by 147
Geometry and Response of Lindbladians
Albert, V. V., Bradlyn, B., Fraas, M., & Jiang, L. (2016) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.6.041031 · Cited by 182
Machine-Learning-Assisted Many-Body Entanglement Measurement
Gray, J., Banchi, L., Bayat, A., & Bose, S. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.150503 · Cited by 137
Multiqubit symmetric states with high geometric entanglement
Martin, J., Giraud, O., Braun, P. A., Braun, D., & Bastin, T. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.81.062347 · Cited by 128
Entropic Uncertainty Relations in Quantum Physics
Białynicki‐Birula, I., & Rudnicki, Ł. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-90-481-3890-6_1 · Cited by 132
Quantum metrology with full and fast quantum control
Sekatski, P., Skotiniotis, M., Kołodyński, J., & Dür, W. (2017) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2017-09-06-27 · Cited by 152
Multipartite entanglement measures
Szalay, S. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.042329 · Cited by 130
Time evolution of complexity: a critique of three methods
Ali, T., Bhattacharyya, A., Haque, S. S., Kim, E. H., & Moynihan, N. (2019) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep04(2019)087 · Cited by 122
Dynamics beyond completely positive maps: Some properties and applications
Carteret, H. A., Terno, D. R., & Życzkowski, K. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.77.042113 · Cited by 118
Self-citationYang, R.-Q., Niu, C., Zhang, C.-Y., & Keun-young Kim, A. (2018) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep02(2018)082 · Cited by 117
Mutually unbiased bases and Hadamard matrices of order six
Bengtsson, I., Bruzda, W., Ericsson, Å., Larsson, J.-Å., Tadej, W., & Życzkowski, K. (2007) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.2716990 · Cited by 130
Self-citationQuantum thermodynamics of general quantum processes
Binder, F. C., Vinjanampathy, S., Modi, K. K., & Goold, J. (2015) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.91.032119 · Cited by 116
Separability-entanglement classifier via machine learning
Lu, S., Huang, S., Li, K., Li, J., Chen, J., Lu, D., Ji, Z., Shen, Y., Zhou, D.-L., & Zeng, B. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.98.012315 · Cited by 125
Hierarchies of geometric entanglement
Blasone, M., Dell’Anno, F., Siena, S. D., & Illuminati, F. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.77.062304 · Cited by 116
Quantifying entanglement resources
Eltschka, C., & Siewert, J. (2014) · University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) · Cited by 111
Experimental observation of weak non-Markovianity
Bernardes, N. K., Cuevas, Á., Orieux, A., Monken, C. H., Mataloni, P., Sciarrino, F., & Santos, M. F. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep17520 · Cited by 110
Dynamics of the Jaynes–Cummings and Rabi models: old wine in new bottles
Larson, J. (2007) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/0031-8949/76/2/007 · Cited by 113
Random matrix techniques in quantum information theory
Collins, B., & Nechita, I. (2015) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4936880 · Cited by 124
Expressibility of the alternating layered ansatz for quantum computation
Nakaji, K., & Yamamoto, N. (2021) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2021-04-19-434 · Cited by 119
Geometric lower bound for a quantum coherence measure
Pires, D. P., Céleri, L. C., & Soares-Pinto, D. O. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.91.042330 · Cited by 104
Nonequilibrium potential and fluctuation theorems for quantum maps
Manzano, G., Horowitz, J. M., & Parrondo, J. M. R. (2015) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.92.032129 · Cited by 105
Non-Markovianity and system-environment correlations in a microscopic collision model
McCloskey, R., & Paternostro, M. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.89.052120 · Cited by 101
Quantum information-geometry of dissipative quantum phase transitions
Banchi, L., Giorda, P., & Zanardi, P. (2014) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.89.022102 · Cited by 101
Robust Extraction of Tomographic Information via Randomized Benchmarking
Kimmel, S., Silva, M. P. D., Ryan, C. A., Johnson, B., & Ohki, T. (2014) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.4.011050 · Cited by 127
Cervera-Lierta, A., Krenn, M., Aspuru‐Guzik, A., & Galda, A. (2022) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.17.024062 · Cited by 111
Uncertainty relations for MUBs and SIC-POVMs in terms of generalized entropies
Rastegin, A. E. (2013) · The European Physical Journal D · doi:10.1140/epjd/e2013-40453-2 · Cited by 106
Holographic Entanglement of PurificationPreprint
Takayanagi, T., & Umemoto, K. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1708.09393 · Cited by 100
Single-loop multiple-pulse nonadiabatic holonomic quantum gates
Herterich, E., & Sjöqvist, E. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.94.052310 · Cited by 97
Interference of identical particles from entanglement to boson-sampling
Tichy, M. C. (2014) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/0953-4075/47/10/103001 · Cited by 98
Fingerprints of spin–orbital entanglement in transition metal oxides
Oleś, A. M. (2012) · Journal of Physics Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/24/31/313201 · Cited by 99
Geometry of the generalized Bloch sphere for qutrits
Goyal, S. K., Simon, B. N., Singh, R., et al. (2016) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/49/16/165203 · Cited by 97
Alternative fidelity measure between quantum states
Mendonça, P. E. M. F., Napolitano, R. D. J., Marchiolli, M. A., Foster, C. J., & Liang, Y.-C. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.78.052330 · Cited by 96
A special simplex in the state space for entangled qudits
Baumgartner, B., Hiesmayr, B. C., & Narnhofer, H. (2007) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/40/28/s03 · Cited by 102
Höhn, P. A., & Wever, C. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.012102 · Cited by 105
Quantum Multiscale Entanglement Renormalization Ansatz Channels
Giovannetti, V., Montangero, S., & Fazio, R. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.180503 · Cited by 95
Quantifying quantumness and the quest for Queens of Quantum
Giraud, O., Braun, P. A., & Braun, D. (2010) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/12/6/063005 · Cited by 94
Quantum speed limits—primer, perspectives, and potential future directions
Frey, M. R. (2016) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-016-1405-x · Cited by 93
Quantum concepts in optical polarization
Goldberg, A. Z., de la Hoz, P., Bjork, G. G., Klimov, A. B., Grassl, M., Leuchs, G., & Sánchez-Soto, L. L. (2020) · Advances in Optics and Photonics · doi:10.1364/aop.404175 · Cited by 100
Universal freezing of quantum correlations within the geometric approach
Cianciaruso, M., Bromley, T. R., Roga, W., Franco, R. L., & Adesso, G. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep10177 · Cited by 92
Dajka, J., Łuczka, J., & Peter Hänggi, A. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.84.032120 · Cited by 92
Quantum steering ellipsoids, extremal physical states and monogamy
Milne, A., Jevtic, S., Jennings, D. H., Wiseman, H. M., & Rudolph, T. (2014) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/8/083017 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Bengtsson, I., & Zyczkowski, K.
- Affiliations
- Stockholm University (SE)
- ORCID
- Bengtsson, Ingemar
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2006-05-11
- OpenAlex
- W360650912
- Cited by
- 1,357
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 50 · 2025: 82 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 81 · 2019: 74 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 62 · 2016: 96 · 2015: 83 · 2014: 81 · 2013: 90 · 2012: 60
- FWCI
- 20.23
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Keywords
- quantum information, quantum state space, finite-dimensional Hilbert space, statistical distance measures, quantum entropy, quantum entanglement, quantum computing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
