The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Geometry of Quantum States: An Introduction to Quantum Entanglement
Abstract
Quantum information theory is at the frontiers of physics, mathematics and information science, offering a variety of solutions that are impossible using classical theory. This book provides an introduction to the key concepts used in processing quantum information and reveals that quantum mechanics is a generalisation of classical probability theory. After a gentle introduction to the necessary mathematics the authors describe the geometry of quantum state spaces. Focusing on finite dimensional Hilbert spaces, they discuss the statistical distance measures and entropies used in quantum theory. The final part of the book is devoted to quantum entanglement - a non-intuitive phenomenon discovered by Schrödinger, which has become a key resource for quantum computation. This richly-illustrated book is useful to a broad audience of graduates and researchers interested in quantum information theory. Exercises follow each chapter, with hints and answers supplied.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“An important theorem in classical polarization optics states that any linear optical element ͑either deterministic or stochastic͒ is equivalent to a composite device made of at most four nondepolarizing elements in parallel ͓32͔.”
From Linear optics and quantum maps (2007) · cites this paper as [32]
In the citing paper
“A result that may be useful in this direction of research is the 'concentration of measure effect' of the gate fidelity which implies that as n increases, the measure of the set of states which produce a fidelity close to the minimum yet far from the average is exponentially small in n [41, 42].”
From Characterizing quantum gates via randomized benchmarking (2012) · cites this paper as [42]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,000
Correlating Thermal Machines and the Second Law at the Nanoscale
Müller, M. P. (2018) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.8.041051 · Cited by 106
Separability criteria and entanglement measures for pure states of N identical fermions
Plastino, A. R., Manzano, D., & Dehesa, J. S. (2009) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/86/20005 · Cited by 91
Witnessed entanglement and the geometric measure of quantum discord
Debarba, T., Maciel, T. O., & Vianna, R. O. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.86.024302 · Cited by 89
Quantum Master Equations: Tips and Tricks for Quantum Optics, Quantum Computing, and Beyond
Campaioli, F., Cole, J. H., & Hapuarachchi, H. (2024) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.5.020202 · Cited by 121
Experimental adaptive Bayesian tomography
Kravtsov, K., Straupe, S. S., Radchenko, I. V., Houlsby, N., Huszár, F., & Kulik, S. P. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.87.062122 · Cited by 87
Random Bosonic States for Robust Quantum Metrology
Oszmaniec, M., Augusiak, R., Gogolin, C., Kołodyński, J., Acín, A., & Lewenstein, M. (2016) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.6.041044 · Cited by 106
The modern tools of quantum mechanics
Paris, M. G. A. (2012) · The European Physical Journal Special Topics · doi:10.1140/epjst/e2012-01535-1 · Cited by 85
Divisibility of quantum dynamical maps and collision models
Filippov, S. N., Piilo, J., Maniscalco, S., & Ziman, M. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.96.032111 · Cited by 84
“[67] I.”
MethodUniversal freezing of quantum correlations within the geometric approach
Cianciaruso, M., Bromley, T. R., Roga, W., Lo Franco, R., & Adesso, G. (2015) · Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) · Cited by 85
Shannon Dimensionality of Quantum Channels and Its Application to Photon Entanglement
Pors, J. B., Oemrawsingh, S. S. R., Aiello, A., van Exter, M. P., Eliel, E. R., Hooft, G. W. ’., & Woerdman, J. P. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.120502 · Cited by 84
Quantum Semiparametric Estimation
Tsang, M., Albarelli, F., & Datta, A. (2020) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.10.031023 · Cited by 97
Unifying Quantum and Classical Speed Limits on Observables
García-Pintos, L. P., Nicholson, S. B., Green, J. R., del Campo, A., & Gorshkov, A. V. (2022) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.12.011038 · Cited by 96
Exploring pure quantum states with maximally mixed reductions
Arnaud, L., & Cerf, N. J. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.87.012319 · Cited by 84
Altafini, C. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2007.908306 · Cited by 80
Complexity for quantum field theory states and applications to thermofield double states
Yang, R.-Q. (2018) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.066004 · Cited by 94
Information-theoretic treatment of tripartite systems and quantum channels
Coles, P. J., Yu, L. Z., Gheorghiu, V., & Griffiths, R. B. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.83.062338 · Cited by 82
“11 of [15]) one can move from a channel ket |Ω〉 satisfying (11) to an isometry V or the reverse.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEntanglement, discord, and the power of quantum computation
Brodutch, A., & Terno, D. R. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.83.010301 · Cited by 81
“It is a unital map, because G is unital [18].”
BackgroundInfluentialEntanglement or separability: the choice of how to factorize the algebra of a density matrix
Thirring, W., Bertlmann, R. A., Köhler, P., & Narnhofer, H. (2011) · The European Physical Journal D · doi:10.1140/epjd/e2011-20452-1 · Cited by 97
Structural approximations to positive maps and entanglement-breaking channels
Korbicz, J. K., Almeida, M. L., Bae, J., Lewenstein, M., & Acín, A. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.78.062105 · Cited by 79
Quantum state tomography with fully symmetric measurements and product measurements
Zhu, H., & Englert, B. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.84.022327 · Cited by 80
Entanglement in the Symmetric Sector of n Qubits
Ribeiro, P., & Mosseri, R. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.180502 · Cited by 78
Flat Information Geometries in Black Hole Thermodynamics
Åman, J. E., Bengtsson, I., & Pidokrajt, N. (2006) · General Relativity and Gravitation · doi:10.1007/s10714-006-0306-1 · Cited by 79
Self-citationInseparability criteria based on matrices of moments
Miranowicz, A., Piani, M., Horodecki, P., & Horodecki, R. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.80.052303 · Cited by 82
Entanglement in fermion systems and quantum metrology
Benatti, F., Roberto Floreanini, B., & Marzolino, U. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.89.032326 · Cited by 79
Information Scrambling over Bipartitions: Equilibration, Entropy Production, and Typicality
Styliaris, G., Anand, N., & Zanardi, P. (2021) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.030601 · Cited by 84
Random Bures mixed states and the distribution of their purity
Osipov, V. A., Sommers, H.-J., & Życzkowski, K. (2010) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/43/5/055302 · Cited by 89
Self-citationQuantum entanglement in a soluble two-electron model atom
Yaüez, R. J., Plastino, A. R., & Dehesa, J. S. (2009) · The European Physical Journal D · doi:10.1140/epjd/e2009-00270-x · Cited by 76
Nonclassical Correlations from Randomly Chosen Local Measurements
Liang, Y.-C., Harrigan, N., Bartlett, S. D., & Rudolph, T. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.050401 · Cited by 75
Environmental correlations and Markovian to non-Markovian transitions in collisional models
Bernardes, N. K., Carvalho, A. R. R., Monken, C. H., & Santos, M. F. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.032111 · Cited by 72
Renyi’s Entropy, Divergence and Their Nonparametric Estimators
Xu, D., & Erdogmuns, D. (2010) · Information science and statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1570-2_2 · Cited by 79
Fundamental limits to frequency estimation: a comprehensive microscopic perspective
Haase, J. F., Smirne, A., Kołodyński, J., Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R., & Huelga, S. F. (2018) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aab67f · Cited by 70
Cones of positive maps and their duality relationsPreprint
Størmer, E., & Karol Zyczkowski, E. A. (2009) · Cited by 78
Jarzynski equality for quantum stochastic maps
Rastegin, A. E., & Życzkowski, K. (2014) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.89.012127 · Cited by 73
Self-citationSauerwein, D., Wallach, N. R., Gour, G., & Kraus, B. (2018) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.8.031020 · Cited by 90
Correspondence Principle for Many-Body Scars in Ultracold Rydberg Atoms
Turner, C. J., Desaules, J.-Y., Bull, K., & Papić, Z. (2021) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.11.021021 · Cited by 76
Miranowicz, A., Bartkiewicz, K., Pathak, A., Peřina, J., Chen, Y.-N., & Nori, F. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.91.042309 · Cited by 68
Quantum correlations and distinguishability of quantum states
Spehner, D. (2014) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4885832 · Cited by 70
Non-equilibrium equalities with unital quantum channels
Rastegin, A. E. (2013) · Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and Experiment · doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2013/06/p06016 · Cited by 79
Noise analysis for high-fidelity quantum entangling gates in an anharmonic linear Paul trap
Wu, Y., Wang, S.-T., & Duan, L.-M. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.97.062325 · Cited by 69
Statistical speed of quantum states: Generalized quantum Fisher information and Schatten speed
Gessner, M., & Smerzi, A. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.97.022109 · Cited by 73
Uhlmann, A. (2010) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e12071799 · Cited by 70
A special simplex in the state space for entangled qudits
Baumgartner, B., Hiesmayr, B., & Narnhofer, H. (2006) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 69
Optimal measurement for quantum discord of two-qubit states
Shi, M., Sun, C., Jiang, F.-J., Yan, X.-H., & Du, J. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.85.064104 · Cited by 68
Universal Bounds for the Holevo Quantity, Coherent Information, and the Jensen-Shannon Divergence
Roga, W., Fannes, M., & Życzkowski, K. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.040505 · Cited by 63
Self-citationCreating a Superposition of Unknown Quantum States
Oszmaniec, M., Grudka, A., Horodecki, M., & Wójcik, A. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.110403 · Cited by 68
Experimental Estimation of Entanglement at the Quantum Limit
Brida, G., Degiovanni, I. P., Florio, A., Genovese, M., Giorda, P., Meda, A., Paris, M. G. A., & Shurupov, A. P. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.100501 · Cited by 69
Practical and Reliable Error Bars in Quantum Tomography
Faist, P., & Renner, R. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.010404 · Cited by 67
Robustness of highly entangled multiqubit states under decoherence
Borràs, A., Majtey, A. P., Plastino, A. R., et al. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.79.022108 · Cited by 67
Robustness of incompatibility for quantum devices
Haapasalo, E. (2015) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/48/25/255303 · Cited by 67
Geometry and the complexity of matrix multiplication
Landsberg, J. M. (2008) · Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society · doi:10.1090/s0273-0979-08-01176-2 · Cited by 63
“In quantum computing (see, e.g., [ 8 ] and the numerous references therein) a pure state corresponds to a point of P(C2 ⊗···⊗ C2) where there are N copies of C2 .A product state corresponds to a point of Seg(P1 ×···× P1) ⊂ P(C2 ⊗···⊗ C2).”
Experimental adaptive quantum tomography of two-qubit states
Struchalin, G. I., Pogorelov, I., Straupe, S. S., Kravtsov, K., Radchenko, I. V., & Kulik, S. P. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.93.012103 · Cited by 60
Quantum SMEFT tomography: Top quark pair production at the LHC
Aoude, R., Madge, E., Fabio Maltoni, B., & Mantani, L. (2022) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.055007 · Cited by 81
Quantum entanglement in two-electron atomic models
Manzano, D., Plastino, A. R., Dehesa, J. S., et al. (2010) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/43/27/275301 · Cited by 65
General entropy-like uncertainty relations in finite dimensions
Zozor, S., Bosyk, G. M., & Portesi, M. (2014) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/47/49/495302 · Cited by 64
Three fermions with six single-particle states can be entangled in two inequivalent ways
Lévay, P., & Vrana, P. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.78.022329 · Cited by 65
Marzolino, U., & Prosen, T. (2017) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.96.104402 · Cited by 63
Quartic quantum theory: an extension of the standard quantum mechanics
Życzkowski, K. (2008) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/41/35/355302 · Cited by 64
“Such a description of quantum mechanics goes back to classical papers of Ludwig [7] and Mielnik [26, 27] and was reviewed and updated in [ 28 ].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationDisentanglement of two harmonic oscillators in relativistic motion
Lin, S.-Y., Chou, C.-H., & Hu, B. L. (2008) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.78.125025 · Cited by 65
Quantum discord of two-qubit rank-2 states
Shi, M., Yang, W., Jiang, F.-J., & Du, J. (2011) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/44/41/415304 · Cited by 62
Flat Information Geometries in Black Hole ThermodynamicsPreprint
Åman, J. E., Bengtsson, I., & Pidokrajt, N. (2006) · Cited by 63
Self-citationSauerwein, D., Wallach, N. R., Gour, G., et al. (2018) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 62
Nonunital non-Markovianity of quantum dynamics
Liu, J., Lu, X.-M., & Wang, X. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.87.042103 · Cited by 63
Adding dynamical generators in quantum master equations
Kołodyński, J., Brask, J. B., Perarnau-Llobet, M., & Bylicka, B. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.97.062124 · Cited by 59
Roga, W., Spehner, D., & Illuminati, F. (2016) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/49/23/235301 · Cited by 61
Gate fidelity fluctuations and quantum process invariants
Magesan, E., Blume-Kohout, R., & Emerson, J. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.84.012309 · Cited by 60
Colloquium : Geometric phases of light: Insights from fiber bundle theory
Cisowski, C. M., Götte, J. B., & Franke‐Arnold, S. (2022) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.94.031001 · Cited by 65
Quantum state estimation with informationally overcomplete measurements
Zhu, H. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.012115 · Cited by 60
Brida, G., Caricato, V., Fedorov, M. V., Genovese, M., Gramegna, M., & Kulik, S. P. (2009) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/87/64003 · Cited by 60
The parity operator: Applications in quantum metrology
Birrittella, R. J., Alsing, P. M., & Gerry, C. C. (2021) · AVS Quantum Science · doi:10.1116/5.0026148 · Cited by 68
SINGULAR VALUE DECOMPOSITION AND MATRIX REORDERINGS IN QUANTUM INFORMATION THEORY
Miszczak, J. A. (2011) · International Journal of Modern Physics C · doi:10.1142/s0129183111016683 · Cited by 60
Achieving quantum precision limit in adaptive qubit state tomography
Hou, Z., Zhu, H., Xiang, G., Li, C., & Guo, G. (2016) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/npjqi.2016.1 · Cited by 59
Induced Ginibre ensemble of random matrices and quantum operations
Fischmann, J., Bruzda, W., Khoruzhenko, B. A., Sommers, H.-J., & Życzkowski, K. (2012) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/45/7/075203 · Cited by 55
Self-citationThermodynamic length for far-from-equilibrium quantum systems
Deffner, S., & Lutz, E. (2013) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.87.022143 · Cited by 56
Tensor Representation of Spin States
Giraud, O., Braun, D., Baguette, D., Bastin, T., & Martin, J. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.080401 · Cited by 57
Exact solution of multiangle quantum many-body collective neutrino-flavor oscillations
Rrapaj, E. (2020) · Physical Review C · doi:10.1103/physrevc.101.065805 · Cited by 56
Quantum state discrimination: A geometric approach
Markham, D., Miszczak, J. A., Puchała, Z., & Życzkowski, K. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.77.042111 · Cited by 55
Self-citationMonogamy Equalities for Qubit Entanglement from Lorentz Invariance
Eltschka, C., & Siewert, J. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.140402 · Cited by 54
Scalable and Parallel Tweezer Gates for Quantum Computing with Long Ion Strings
Olsacher, T., Postler, L., Schindler, P., Monz, T., Zoller, P., & Sieberer, L. M. (2020) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.1.020316 · Cited by 58
Properties of the general N -Higgs-doublet model. I. The orbit space
Ivanov, I. P., & Nishi, C. C. (2010) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.82.015014 · Cited by 55
Squashing model for detectors and applications to quantum-key-distribution protocols
Gittsovich, O., Beaudry, N. J., Narasimhachar, V., et al. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.89.012325 · Cited by 55
Faghihi, M. J., Tavassoly, M. K., & Harouni, M. B. (2014) · Laser Physics · doi:10.1088/1054-660x/24/4/045202 · Cited by 53
Maximally Entangled Multipartite States: A Brief Survey
Enríquez, M., Wintrowicz, I., & Życzkowski, K. (2016) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/698/1/012003 · Cited by 58
Self-citationMazurek, M. D., Pusey, M. F., Resch, K. J., & Spekkens, R. W. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.020302 · Cited by 69
Time-dependent Hamiltonians with 100% evolution speed efficiency
Uzdin, R., Günther, U., Rahav, S., & Moiseyev, N. (2012) · Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/45/41/415304 · Cited by 54
Precision-Guaranteed Quantum Tomography
Sugiyama, T., Turner, P. S., & Murao, M. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.160406 · Cited by 54
Quantum error-correcting subsystems are unitarily recoverable subsystems
Kribs, D. W., & Spekkens, R. W. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.74.042329 · Cited by 54
Matrix versions of the Hellinger distance
Bhatia, R., Gaubert, S., & Jain, T. (2019) · Letters in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/s11005-019-01156-0 · Cited by 54
Information geometry of Gaussian channels
Monràs, A., & Illuminati, F. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.81.062326 · Cited by 52
Gaussian interferometric power
Adesso, G. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.022321 · Cited by 57
Fundamental Work Cost of Quantum Processes
Faist, P., & Renner, R. (2018) · Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) · doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000260388 · Cited by 50
A purification postulate for quantum mechanics with indefinite causal order
Araújo, M., Feix, A., Navascués, M., & Brukner, Č. (2017) · Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) · Cited by 52
Information-geometric reconstruction of quantum theory
Goyal, P. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.78.052120 · Cited by 53
Naschie, M. S. E. (2013) · Journal of Modern Physics · doi:10.4236/jmp.2013.45084 · Cited by 52
Stability of many-body localization in Floquet systems
Sierant, P., Lewenstein, M., Scardicchio, A., & Zakrzewski, J. (2023) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.107.115132 · Cited by 63
Composite pulses in NMR as nonadiabatic geometric quantum gates
Ota, Y., & Kondo, Y. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.80.024302 · Cited by 51
Qudits for witnessing quantum-gravity-induced entanglement of masses under decoherence
Tilly, J., Marshman, R. J., Mazumdar, A., & Bose, S. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.104.052416 · Cited by 59
Transition Probability (Fidelity) and Its Relatives
Uhlmann, A. (2010) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-009-9381-y · Cited by 52
Entanglement thresholds for random induced statesPreprint
Aubrun, G., Law, S., Szarek, J., & Ye, D. (2014) · Cited by 58
Entanglement and the speed of evolution of multi-partite quantum systems
Zander, C., Plastino, A. R., Plastino, A., & Casas, M. (2007) · Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/40/11/020 · Cited by 52
Entanglement and thermodynamics in general probabilistic theories
Chiribella, G., & Scandolo, C. M. (2015) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/17/10/103027 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Bengtsson, I., & Zyczkowski, K.
- Affiliations
- Stockholm University (SE)
- ORCID
- Bengtsson, Ingemar
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2006-05-11
- OpenAlex
- W360650912
- Cited by
- 1,357
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 50 · 2025: 82 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 81 · 2019: 74 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 62 · 2016: 96 · 2015: 83 · 2014: 81 · 2013: 90 · 2012: 60
- FWCI
- 20.23
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Keywords
- quantum information, quantum state space, finite-dimensional Hilbert space, statistical distance measures, quantum entropy, quantum entanglement, quantum computing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
