The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Animal Traditions: Behavioural Inheritance in Evolution
Abstract
Animal Traditions maintains that the assumption that the selection of genes supplies both a sufficient explanation of the evolution and a true description of its course is, despite its almost universal acclaim, wrong. Eytan Avital and Eva Jablonka contend that evolutionary explanations must take into account the well-established fact that in mammals and birds, the transfer of learnt information is both ubiquitous and indispensable. The introduction of the behavioural inheritance system into the Darwinian explanatory scheme enables the authors to offer new interpretations for common behaviours such as maternal behaviours, behavioural conflicts within families, adoption and helping. This approach offers a richer view of heredity and evolution, integrates developmental and evolutionary processes, suggests new lines for research, and provides a constructive alternative to both the selfish gene and meme views of the world. It will make stimulating reading for all those interested in evolutionary biology, sociobiology, behavioural ecology and psychology.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The human need to belong, think alike, network and protect each other's beliefs and behaviours can be likened to many herd animal behaviours.
“The human need to belong, think alike, network and protect each other’s beliefs and behaviours, can be liked to many herd animal behaviours [82,83].”
From What People Really Think About Safety around Horses: The Relationship between Risk Perception, Values and Safety Behaviours (2020) · cites this paper as [83]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Beyond DNA: integrating inclusive inheritance into an extended theory of evolution
Danchin, É., Charmantier, A., Champagne, F. A., Mesoudi, A., Pujol, B., & Blanchet, S. (2011) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3028 · Cited by 860
Evolution of primate gene expression
Khaitovich, P., Enard, W., Lachmann, M., & Pääbo, S. (2006) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1940 · Cited by 341
The Cambrian explosion and the origins of embodied cognition.
Trestman, M. (2013) · Biological Theory · doi:10.1007/s13752-013-0102-6 · Cited by 70
Evolutionary systems theory: a unifying meta-theory of psychological science
Badcock, P. B. (2012) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0026381 · Cited by 61
Chapman, M., Thomas, M., & Thompson, K. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10122222 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Avital, E., & Jablonka, E.
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2000-11-23
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review