The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Adaptation, constraint, and chance in the evolution of flower color and pollinator color vision
Abstract
Anciently the teaching was that nothing would have been created that did not have a definite purpose, and more recently it has been that natural selection would eliminate anything that did not serve an equally definite purpose. … the assumed relation between the colors of flowers and the … pollinating insects is such a classic … Apparently there is something about the internal mechanism … that makes it difficult for a rose to be blue. … therefore, the use of the idea of natural selection to explain the absence of blue roses in nature is not only not necessary but it is not justified … It would be much better for the rose to be blue. F. E. Lutz (1924) We commonly think that biological signals and receivers are mutually tuned to one another. Flower colors and pollinator color vision are not exceptions. The diversity of flower colors and the differences in color vision between different classes of pollinators make speculations about their mutual adaptation tempting. Yet close inspection reveals that we know very little about evolutionary changes in flower color induced by selection pressures related to pollination, nor is there much evidence to show that color vision systems of pollinators have been tuned to flower color. We shall review cases where we think such changes have occurred, and other cases where they have not, even where a purely adaptationist scenario would predict evolutionary tuning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pollinator-mediated evolution of floral signals
Schiestl, F. P., & Johnson, S. D. (2013) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2013.01.019 · Cited by 623
Synergy between visual and olfactory cues in nectar feeding by naı̈ve hawkmoths, Manduca sexta
Raguso, R. A., & Willis, M. A. (2002) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1006/anbe.2002.4010 · Cited by 384
How plant?animal interactions signal new insights in communication
SCHAEFER, H., SCHAEFER, V, & LEVEY, D. (2004) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.08.003 · Cited by 329
Floral Traits and Pollination Systems in the Caatinga, a Brazilian Tropical Dry Forest
Machado, I. C. (2004) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mch152 · Cited by 263
Thairu, M. W., & Brunet, J. (2015) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcv028 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Chittka, L., Spaethe, J., Schmidt, A., & Hickelsberger, A.
- Venue
- Cognitive Ecology of Pollination
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2001-01-01
- Pages
- 106-126
- OpenAlex
- W2339490161
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.52
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adaptation, constraint, and chance in the evolution of flower color and pollinator color vision. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511542268.007
- The paper
- Chittka, L., Spaethe, J., Schmidt, A., & Hickelsberger, A. (2001). Adaptation, constraint, and chance in the evolution of flower color and pollinator color vision. Cognitive Ecology of Pollination. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511542268.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.