The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Random Graph Dynamics
Abstract
The theory of random graphs began in the late 1950s in several papers by Erdos and Renyi. In the late twentieth century, the notion of six degrees of separation, meaning that any two people on the planet can be connected by a short chain of people who know each other, inspired Strogatz and Watts to define the small world random graph in which each site is connected to k close neighbors, but also has long-range connections. At a similar time, it was observed in human social and sexual networks and on the Internet that the number of neighbors of an individual or computer has a power law distribution. This inspired Barabasi and Albert to define the preferential attachment model, which has these properties. These two papers have led to an explosion of research. The purpose of this book is to use a wide variety of mathematical argument to obtain insights into the properties of these graphs. A unique feature is the interest in the dynamics of process taking place on the graph in addition to their geometric properties, such as connectedness and diameter.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509 · Cited by 36,135
Superspreading and the effect of individual variation on disease emergence
Lloyd-Smith, J. O., Schreiber, S. J., Kopp, P. E., & Getz, W. M. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04153 · Cited by 2,514
How Viruses Spread Among Computers and People
Lloyd, A. L., & May, R. M. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1061076 · Cited by 661
Cited by
Critical phenomena in complex networks
Dorogovtsev, S. N., Goltsev, A. V., & Mendes, J. F. F. (2008) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.80.1275 · Cited by 2,220
A Survey of Statistical Network Models
Goldenberg, A., Zheng, A. X., Fienberg, S. E., & Airoldi, E. M. (2010) · Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning · doi:10.1561/2200000005 · Cited by 819
Frieze, A., & Karoński, M. (2015) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316339831 · Cited by 576
Recent advances in percolation theory and its applications
Saberi, A. A. (2015) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2015.03.003 · Cited by 438
Cryptic laminar and columnar organization in the dorsolateral pallium of a weakly electric fish
Trinh, A., Harvey‐Girard, E., Teixeira, F., & Maler, L. (2016) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.23874 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Durrett, R.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2006-10-23
- OpenAlex
- W1526841711
- Cited by
- 780
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 25.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Random Graph Dynamics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511546594
- The paper
- Durrett, R. (2006). Random Graph Dynamics. Cambridge University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511546594
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.