The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The value of patents as indicators of inventive activity
Abstract
Introduction In this paper we present an overview of a series of studies pursued at the NBER during the last decade which used patent statistics to study different aspects of the economics of technological change. It consists of five substantive sections: a description of our firm level data; a report on the relationship between R&D expenditures and the level of patenting; a report on the relationship between patents, the stock market value of firms, and their R&D expenditures; a summary of work on the estimation of the value of patent rights based on patent renewal data; and a description of the use of patent data to estimate the importance of R&D spillovers. A brief set of conclusions closes the paper. The NBER R&D data base and the growth of US firms in the 1970s A major achievement of the NBER project has been the development and construction of a large data set covering the economic and technological performance of most publicly traded US manufacturing companies from the early 1960s through the early 1980s. It is the result of a detailed match of publicly available sales, employment, investment, R&D, and balance sheet information from the Compustat tapes (based on company 10–K filings with the SEC) with data acquired from the US Patent Office on patents issued to all organizations between 1969 and 1982.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Does Stock Liquidity Enhance or Impede Firm Innovation?
FANG, V. W., TIAN, X., & TICE, S. (2014) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.12187 · Cited by 1,339
Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry
Shan, W., Walker, G., & Kogut, B. (1994) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250150505 · Cited by 1,166
Arm’s Length Financing and Innovation: Evidence from Publicly Traded Firms
Atanassov, J. (2016) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2014.2097 · Cited by 157
Metadata
- Authors
- Griliches, Z., Pakes, A., & Hall, B. H.
- Venue
- Economic Policy and Technological Performance
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1987-10-15
- Pages
- 97-124
- OpenAlex
- W1480130531
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.57
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.