Arm’s Length Financing and Innovation: Evidence from Publicly Traded Firms
Open accessAbstract
Using a large panel of U.S. companies, I document that firms that rely more on arm’s length financing, such as public debt and equity, innovate more and have higher-quality innovations than firms that use other sources, such as relationship-based bank financing. I hypothesize that one possible reason for this finding is the greater flexibility and tolerance to experimentation associated with arm’s length financing. I find support for this hypothesis by showing that firms with more arm’s length financing have greater volatility of innovative output, and are more likely to innovate in new technological areas. Furthermore, focusing only on bank financing, I demonstrate that firms have more novel innovations if they borrow from multiple banks, use predominantly credit lines, and have less intense covenants. I address potential endogeneity concerns by using instrumental variable analysis, and by showing that innovation increases significantly after new public debt offerings and seasoned equity offerings, but does not change after new bank loans. This paper was accepted by Gustavo Manso, finance.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Local banks can promptly familiarize themselves with SME clients' financial positions, closely monitor their operations, and provide professional services accordingly.
“As a result, local banks can promptly familiarize SME clients' financial positions, closely monitor their operations, and provide professional services accordingly (Atanassov 2015).”
From Local Bank, Digital Financial Inclusion and SME Financing Constraints: Empirical Evidence from China (2022) · cites this paper as Atanassov 2015
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 74 · Cited by 157
- Authors
- Atanassov, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Oregon (US)
- Corresponding author
- Atanassov, Julian
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 2016-01
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 128-155
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2132075228
- Cited by
- 157
- References
- 74
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 44.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- papers.ssrn.com
- Locations
- Management Science (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Corporate Finance and Governance
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Firm Innovation and Growth
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
- Keywords
- innovation, public debt, seasoned equity offerings, credit lines, innovation quality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review