The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bargaining costs, influence costs, and the organization of economic activity
Abstract
This chapter is concerned with the economics of organization and management, a relatively new area of study that seeks to analyze the internal structure and workings of economic organizations, the division of activity among these organizations, and the management of relations between them through markets or other higher-level, encompassing organizations. The dominant approach to this subject is transaction-cost economics, as introduced by Coase (1937, 1960) and developed by several others since, most notably Williamson (1975, 1985). The main tenet of Coase's theory is that economic activities tend to be organized efficiently – that is, so as to maximize the expected total wealth of the parties affected. In this context, two sorts of costs are customarily identified – those of physical production and distribution and those of carrying out necessary exchanges. Because these are typically treated as distinct and separable, the efficiency hypothesis becomes one of transaction-cost minimization: The division of activities among firms and between a firm and the market is determined by whether a particular transaction is most efficiently conducted in a market setting or under centralized authority within a firm. This approach has two conceptual problems. First, the total costs a firm incurs cannot generally be expressed as the sum of production costs – depending only on the technology and the inputs used – and transaction costs – depending only on the way transactions are organized. In general, these two kinds of costs must be considered together; efficient organization is not simply a matter of minimizing transaction costs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Resource-Based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge Versus Opportunism
Conner, K. R., & Prahalad, C. K. (1996) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.7.5.477 · Cited by 3,146
Holmstrom, B. (1989) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/0167-2681(89)90025-5 · Cited by 1,648
Weingast, B. R., & Marshall, W. J. (1988) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261528 · Cited by 1,527
A knowledge-based theory of the firm—The problem-solving perspective
Nickerson, J. A., & Zenger, T. R. (2004) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0093 · Cited by 1,342
Chapter 3 Transaction cost economics
Williamson, O. E. (1989) · Handbook of Industrial Organization · doi:10.1016/s1573-448x(89)01006-x · Cited by 600
Metadata
- Authors
- Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J.
- Venue
- Perspectives on Positive Political Economy
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1990-09-28
- Pages
- 57-89
- OpenAlex
- W2143436162
- Cited by
- 553
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 52.01
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bargaining costs, influence costs, and the organization of economic activity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511571657.005
- The paper
- Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1990). Bargaining costs, influence costs, and the organization of economic activity. Perspectives on Positive Political Economy. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511571657.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.