Cited by 1,527Game Theory and Voting SystemsEconomic Theory and InstitutionsLegal and Constitutional Studies

The Industrial Organization of Congress; or, Why Legislatures, Like Firms, Are Not Organized as Markets

Weingast, Barry R., Marshall, William J.·1988·Journal of Political Economy

Abstract

This paper provides a theory of legislative institutions that parallels the theory of the firm and the theory of contractual institutions. Like market institutions, legislative institutions reflect two key components: the goals or preferences of individuals (here, representatives seeking reelection) and the relevant transactions costs. We present three conclusions. First, we show how the legislative institutions enforce bargains among legislators. Second, we explain why, given the peculiar form of bargaining problems found in legislatures, specific forms of nonmarket exchange prove superior to market exchange. Third, our approach shows how the committee system limits the types of coalitions that may form on a particular issue.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/261528

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Functionalist arguments are prevalent among political scientists, including among those who emphasize the rational choices of individual actors underlying political activity and the reasonably efficient nature of collective responses to social needs.

    “Although not always explicitly stated, functionalist arguments are prevalent among political scientists.They are common, for instance, among those who emphasize the rational choices of individual actors that underlie political activity, and the reasonably efficient nature of collective responses to social needs (Keohane 1984;Shepsle 1986;Weingast and Marshall 1988).”

    From Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics (2000) · cites this paper as Weingast and Marshall 1988

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weingast, B. R., & Marshall, W. J.
Venue
Journal of Political Economy
Published
1988-02
Volume
96
Issue
1
Pages
132-163
ISSN
  • 0022-3808 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-534X
OpenAlex
W1981719767
Cited by
1,527
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 68
FWCI
63.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Political Economy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Game Theory and Voting Systems
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Theory and Institutions
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Legal and Constitutional Studies
Keywords
legislatures, theory of the firm, transaction costs, market exchange, committee system, coalition formation, reelection incentives, legislative organization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review