Consistent discretizations as a road to Quantum Gravity
Abstract
Consistent discretizations: the basic idea There has long been the hope that lattice methods could be used as a non-perturbative approach to Quantum Gravity. This is in part based on the fact that lattice methods have been quite successful in the treatment of quantum chromodynamics. However, one needs to recall that one of the appeals of lattice methods in QCD is that they are gauge invariant regularization methods. In the gravitational context this is not the case. As soon as one discretizes space-time one breaks the invariance under diffeomorphisms, the symmetry of most gravitational theories of interest. As such, lattice methods in the gravitational context face unique challenges. For instance, in the path integral context, since the lattices break some of the symmetries of the theory, this may complicate the use of the Fadeev–Popov technique. In the canonical approach if one discretizes the constraints and equations of motion, the resulting discrete equations are inconsistent: they cannot be solved simultaneously. A related problem is that the discretized constraints fail to close a constraint algebra. To address these problems we have proposed a different methodology for discretizing gravitational theories (or to use a different terminology “to put gravity on the lattice”). The methodology is related to a discretization technique that has existed for a while in the context of unconstrained theories called “variational integrators”. In a nutshell, the technique consists in discretizing the action of the theory and working from it the discrete equations of motion.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In four dimensions, results from the consistent-discretization approach indicate that diffeomorphism invariance is broken by discretization in the sense that there is no infinitesimal generator of diffeomorphism.
“Their results indicate that diff-invariance is indeed broken by the discretization in the sense that there is no infinitesimal generator of diffeomorphism.”
From The Spin-Foam Approach to Quantum Gravity (2013) · cites this paper as [199]
Cites
TIME AND INTERPRETATIONS OF QUANTUM GRAVITY
Kuchař, K. V. (2011) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271811019347 · Cited by 692 · see citing works
Limitation to Quantum Measurements of Space‐Time Distancesa
Ng, Y. J., & van Dam, H. (1995) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1995.tb38998.x · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Consistent discretization and canonical classical and quantum Regge calculus
Gambini, R., & Pullin, J. A. (2005) · Civil War Book Review · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Self-citationConsistent and mimetic discretizations in general relativity
Bartolo, C. D., Gambini, R., & Pullin, J. A. (2005) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1841483 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationCONSISTENT DISCRETE GRAVITY SOLUTION OF THE PROBLEM OF TIME: A MODEL
Gambini, R., Porto, R. A., & Pullin, J. A. (2003) · doi:10.1142/9789812791238_0004 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citationConsistent discretizations: The Gowdy spacetimes
Gambini, R., Ponce, M., & Pullin, J. (2005) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.72.024031 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citationFundamental gravitational limitations to quantum computingPreprint
Gambini, R., Porto, R. A., & Pullin, J. A. (2005) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0507262 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citationDiscrete space-timePreprint
Gambini, R., & Pullin, J. A. (2005) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.gr-qc/0505023 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Spin-Foam Approach to Quantum Gravity
Perez, A. (2013) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2013-3 · Cited by 677 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gambini, R., & Pullin, J.
- Affiliations
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Gambini, R.
- Venue
- Approaches to Quantum Gravity
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2009-03-05
- Pages
- 378-392
- OpenAlex
- W1484935812
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2017: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 7.18
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Keywords
- quantum gravity, lattice discretization, variational integrators, diffeomorphism invariance, constraint algebra, canonical quantization, path integral, gauge invariance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review